similar to: error in split... (R 0.65.1) -- and patch (PR#294)

Date: 20 Oct 1999 17:19:02 -0700 Message-ID: <87yacx36rt.fsf@alpha.cfas.washington.edu> Lines: 62 (repeated: > version _ platform i686-unknown-linux arch i686 os linux system i686, linux status Release major 0 minor 65.1 year 1999 month October

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:18 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Meetme... No channel type registered > for'zap' > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:06:02AM -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > -----Original

Subject says it all- has anyone got any recommendations for rpm-packaged forum/bb software for CentOS 5 - preferrably from a repo like rpmforge or similar so it will get updates as they come through? Yes, I can install phpBB et al from scratch but I with 'yum update' it is harder for me to miss updates :-) -- Cheers, Tony

Hello, R users, I have two factors (treat, section) anova design experiment where there are 3 replicates. The objective of the experiment is to test if there is significant difference of yield between top (section 9 to 11) and bottom (section 9 to 11) of the fruit tree under treatment. I found that there are interaction between two factors. I wonder if I can contrast means from levels of

Hello, R experts, If I understand Ted's anwser correctly, then I can not contrast the mean yields between sections 1-8 and 9-11 under "Trt" but I can contrast mean yields for sections 1-3 and 6-11 because there exists significant interaction between two factors (Trt:section4, Trt:section5). Could I use the commands below to test the difference between sections 1-3 and 6-11 ?

Dear all, I'm having a problem understanding why a split does not occur with in the 2nd use of the function strsplit below: # text strings > txt <- c("sales to 23 August 2008 published 29 August", + "sales to 6 September 2008 published?11 September") # first use > strsplit(txt, 'published', fixed=TRUE) [[1]] [1] "sales to 23 August 2008 "

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I am confused whether Student's sleep data "show the effect of two soporific drugs" or Control against Treatment (one drug). The reason is the next: > require(stats) > data(sleep) > attach(sleep) > extra[group==1] numeric(0) > group [1] Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt [20] Trt Levels: Ctl Trt > sleep$group [1] 1 1 1 1 1

In trying to track down a weird tree log problem I wanted to make sure that the free space cache was actually valid, which we currently have no way of doing. So this patch adds a bunch of support for the free space cache code and then a checker to fsck. Basically we go through and if we can actually load the free space cache then we will walk the extent tree and verify that the free space cache

I have just got a Cisco 7941G and am experiencing the exact same problem (phone is requesting .tlv file from TFTP server and never asks for .cnf.xml file). The phone originally had SCCP on it, but I downloaded and flashed with the latest Cisco SIP image (8.4(3) released 2009-01-13). In reading your message below, it looks like you were going to try an incremental upgrade?did you have any

Hi all, I'm using SVM to classify data (2 classes) and I get strange results : > model = svm(x, y, probability = TRUE) > pred = predict(model, x, decision.values = TRUE, probability = FALSE) > table(pred,y) y pred ctl nuc ctl 82 3 nuc 5 84 > pred 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .... nuc nuc nuc nuc nuc nuc nuc ctl .... And now, with probabities computation :

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Do not allocate a vmcb_control_area and a vmcb_save_area on the stack, as these structures will become larger with future extenstions of SVM and thus the svm_set_nested_state() function will become a too large stack frame. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 47

This patch introduces to a new tun/tap specific msg_control: #define TUN_MSG_UBUF 1 #define TUN_MSG_PTR 2 struct tun_msg_ctl { int type; void *ptr; }; This allows us to pass different kinds of msg_control through sendmsg(). The first supported type is ubuf (TUN_MSG_UBUF) which will be used by the existed vhost_net zerocopy code. The second is XDP buff, which allows vhost_net to

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:23PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch introduces to a new tun/tap specific msg_control: > > #define TUN_MSG_UBUF 1 > #define TUN_MSG_PTR 2 > struct tun_msg_ctl { > int type; > void *ptr; > }; > > This allows us to pass different kinds of msg_control through > sendmsg(). The first supported type is ubuf

This patch implements XDP batching for vhost_net with tun. This is done by batching XDP buffs in vhost and submit them when: - vhost_net can not build XDP buff (mostly because of the size of packet) - #batched exceeds the limitation (VHOST_NET_RX_BATCH). - tun accept a batch of XDP buff through msg_control and process them in a batch With this tun XDP can benefit from e.g batch transmission

Dear All I installed a Digium card TE405P with zaptel and its running successfully with no alarms, but asterisk is not running . Any one have a cure or advice 03:09.0 Communication controller: Digium, Inc. Wildcard TE405P quad-span T1/E1/J1 card 5.0V (rev 02) Nov 14 07:56:58 localhost kernel: wct4xxp: Clearing yellow alarm on span 2 Nov 14 07:56:58 localhost kernel: wct4xxp: Clearing

This patch implement TUN_MSG_PTR msg_control type. This type allows the caller to pass an array of XDP buffs to tuntap through ptr field of the tun_msg_control. Tap will build skb through those XDP buffers. This will avoid lots of indirect calls thus improves the icache utilization and allows to do XDP batched flushing when doing XDP redirection. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch implement TUN_MSG_PTR msg_control type. This type allows > the caller to pass an array of XDP buffs to tuntap through ptr field > of the tun_msg_control. Tap will build skb through those XDP buffers. > > This will avoid lots of indirect calls thus improves the icache > utilization and allows to do XDP

Hi! In R 3.0.0 from current SVN, ?summary.lm says: > Value [...] > df degrees of freedom, a 3-vector (p, n-p, p*), the last > being the number of non-aliased coefficients. ?summary.glm says: > df a 3-vector of the rank of the model and the number of residual > degrees of freedom, plus number of non-aliased coefficients. It seems to me that the description is reversed: p is

This patch implement TUN_MSG_PTR msg_control type. This type allows the caller to pass an array of XDP buffs to tuntap through ptr field of the tun_msg_control. If an XDP program is attached, tuntap can run XDP program directly. If not, tuntap will build skb and do a fast receiving since part of the work has been done by vhost_net. This will avoid lots of indirect calls thus improves the icache