similar to: R's UseMethod() does not dispatch on changed class() (PR#167)

Hi, The 2 man pages give inconsistent description of class(): Found in ?class: If the object does not have a class attribute, it has an implicit class, ?"matrix"?, ?"array"? or the result of ?mode(x)? (except that integer vectors have implicit class ?"integer"?). Found in ?UseMethod: Matrices and arrays have class ?"matrix"?

hi,usRs,i am studing the R programming,but i can not get the point abut the difference between UseMethod and NextMehod.i have read the manual and try to find the solutin from internet,but i still not master it well.so anyone can give me a guide?it will be better to show some examples . thank you !

(a new thread, on purpose) >>>>> "RobG" == Robert Gentleman <rgentlem at fhcrc.org> >>>>> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:55:50 -0700 writes: RobG> Hi, I just committed a change to R-devel so that if RobG> debug is called on an S3 generic function, all methods RobG> will also automatically have debug turned on for them RobG>

I am sorry that this IS an old topic. Yet another task I think the bug is somewhere in hidden in src/main/options.c .. ##-- The following does not work as it should in R (0.50-a1, but I think also earlier) tst <- function(x=pi, dig =3) {.Options$digits <- as.integer(dig); print(x);x} tst() tst(dig = 12) ##-- This should do the same; it works as expected in R & S : tst2

In their paper, "Lexical Scope and Statistical Computing", the authors ( Gentleman and Ihaka ) go to great length explaining why R's use of lexical scoping creates advantages when doing statistical computations. If anyone has or is familiar with this paper, could they provide the main program code for how the "newton" function would be called in their example on page 500

Just thought I would mention that there is a new O'Reilly book out, "Developing Bioinformatics Computer Skills", which is ok, pretty superficial about some things but at least it lets you know what is happening and where. R gets a few pages in there, 394-396, mostly nice press and accurate except that Bill Venables (hi Bill) may be surprised to find out that he is a member of the

I am resubmitting this to r-bugs, since Thomas Lumley indicates that it might be an error: On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Thomas Lumley wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, halvorsen wrote: > > > Hola! > > > > I have the following simple function: > > > > > testcar > > function(pow){ > > ob <- glm(Pound~CG+Age+Vage,data=car,weights=No, > >

Dear all, I have define a function and its methods as follows: ######## beginning of code fn <- function(x,...){ UseMethod("fn") } fn.foo1 <- function(x, commonA=1, ...){ print("fn.foo1 is called.") } fn.foo2 <- function(x, uniqueFoo2, common=1, ...){ ## uniqueFoo2 is a unique argument in fn.foo2 x <- uniqueFoo2; class(x) <- "foo1" ## use uniqueFoo2

Rgraphviz I cannot load it I have re-installed etc etc etc etc And cannot load it Message is 6): Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libgvc.3.dylib Referenced from: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.6/Resources/library/Rgraphviz/lib s/ppc/Rgraphviz.so Reason: image not found Error : .onLoad failed in ''loadNamespace'' for ''Rgraphviz'' Error:

Dear R-help, I think I have kinda isolated the problem I had to the following: i <- 0 while( {i <- i + 1} < 5) { if(i < 3) next print(i) } This seems to go into an infinite loop. After I break the execution, i has the value 1. At the R prompt, if I start from i <- 0 and keep typing {i <- i + 1} < 5, it eventually evaluate to TRUE. So why does the while loop not work?

Is there an implementation of a reasonable k-nearest neighbor finder already in one of the packages? -- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Robert Gentleman phone : (617) 632-5250 | | Associate Professor fax: (617) 632-2444 | | Department of Biostatistics office: not yet

Dear R developers, I will ask a very straightforward question concerning UseMethod's future, because people depending on my code wonder what will happen to it next. In R v2.0.1 NEWS it says o The undocumented use of UseMethod() with no argument is now formally deprecated. and in the R v2.0.1 help(UseMethod) it says 'UseMethod' accepts a call with no arguments and tries to

It was my fault, as you have seen. Y matrix must contain successes and failures, and not successes and trials. Sorry for my ignorance and thanks a lot for your help. Oscar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20001220/341c2519/attachment.html

match the argument 'x' if there is another argument with prefix 'x' Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: 1.3.1 OS: Sun Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.3.49) I ran into a strange problem with UseMethod(). Run the following code: foo.Bar <- function(this, x=0, xidx=0) { cat("In foo.Bar(): ", this, ", x=", x, ", xidx=", xidx,

If I do > example(lm) ... > mycoef <- function(object, ...) UseMethod("coef", object) > mycoef(lm.D9) Error in mycoef(lm.D9) : no applicable method for "coef" which is pretty surprising, as coef has a default method. After a bit of digging, this comes from do_usemethod having defenv = environment where the generic was defined */ defenv =

(On Unix/Linux) Is it possible to set the --no-save command line option as an option in the .Rprofile file. I have looked in the sources and do not see any obvious (user initiated) ways of changing the command line defaults, but I am hoping I have missed something. I *know* I can write my own shell script wrapper that calls R with whatever arguments I want (and I do that). However there

Prof. Tierney, Thanks very much for the info. Why does the loop work if I move the assignment out of the condition? E.g., the following works: i <- 0 while(i < 5) { i <- i + 1 if(i < 3) next print(i) } Regards, Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Luke Tierney [mailto:luke at nokomis.stat.umn.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:36 PM > To: Liaw, Andy

Hello, Could someone please tell me what I am thinking about incorrectly: f <- function(y) { g <- function(x) x + y g } In the following, I get what I expect based on my understanding of lexical scoping: (f(1))(3) # 4 (f(2))(3) # 5 But now, fs <- lapply(c(1, 2), f) fs[[1]](3) # 5 (Why not 4 ?) fs[[2]](3) # 5 Checking the environments of these functions, I see that

UseMethod has since the beginning had the 'feature' that local variables in the generic are added to the environment in which the method body is evaluated. This is documented in ?UseMethod and R-lang.texi, but use of this 'feature' has been explicitly discouraged in R-lang.texi for many years. This is an unfortunate design decision for a number of reasons (see below), so the plan

Hello, is the following somehow possible with Mod() being a primitive: "Mod" <- function(x) UseMethod("Mod") "Mod.default" <- function(x) { .Primitive("Mod") ### I know it?s wrong. How can I access the original Mod ? } Thanks for help M. Eger -- +------------------------------------------------------- | Marcus Eger | Philipps Universitaet