Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "HREFS for private packages - fixed? (PR#19)"
1998 Aug 19
3
R 0.62.3 to be released soon
For the (slightly) adventurous among you:
We plan to roll out R 0.62.3 next Friday. In order to root out
remaining bugs before the release, I'd like to encourage you to try it
out on your system.
Since there is a risk of destabilising things whenever you mess with
the configure scripts, we won't attack installation problems on
unusual platforms after this week.
We also won't take
1998 Jun 19
1
R INSTALL doc woes
I put some documentation in a file dse/man/dse.Rd in and did
R INSTALL -l rlibs dse
This built the copies of dse.Rd in rlibs/dse/{help latex html}.
It also wrote over R/doc/html/function.html and R/doc/html/packages.html,
effectively clobbering all the R documentation.
Also, the link that gets put in R/doc/html/packages.html points to
R/library/dse/html/00Index.html
rather than
2003 Apr 23
1
Bug in versioned install (was: (fwd) R-1.7.0 : Problem with Downloading "dse") (PR#2827)
The reason dse won't install is because of the new versioned install
code. It assumes that it's dealing with a plain package, and doesn't
handle bundles properly.
Robert, could you look at that?
A workaround is as follows. After the install.packages call fails
with this message
>Error in file(file, "r") : unable to open connection
>In addition: Warning message:
1998 Jun 19
1
DSE status
I have my DSE library working fairly well now with 0.62.1. It required a few
changes because of the changes to R INSTALL and "xxx<-" functions. I would like
to tar up a new version soon but
1/ for testing I have been using a kludge in .First.lib to select the first
element of section - since I happen to know that is the element I need given the
way I have $RLIBS set. This argument
2006 Feb 02
2
RHOME
R-help --
I built R-2.2.1 in my own directory on a sun (solaris). Now I would like
the sysadmin to move the contents to /usr/local/lib and place the binary
in /usr/local/bin. No problem. However, the RHOME variable defaults to
the directory from which R was built so it is not usable by anyone but me
or ROOT. I would like to avoid building this again if possible. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dan
1998 Oct 26
1
package help clobbers R help (html)
As with 0.62.3, when I install my dse package with documentation in 0.62.4 the
html help in R/doc/html/function.html gets clobbered so that the regular R
function help is not available. I was postponing a revised version of my dse
library install in the hope that this might be fixed.
Does anyone know if this is a simple problem that I can hope will be fixed soon,
or should I consider a
2001 Apr 18
1
Problem with Rcmd check
In Windows, I tried to build and check Paul Gilbert's dse bundle with
the command
rcmd check ../library/dse
It ran for a while and built the packages, then failed at the end with
this:
** checking Rd files ... OK
** checking for undocumented objects ... OK
** creating syskern-Ex.R ... ERROR
I get similar errors checking packages, but there
make pkgcheck-foo
works. I don't
1998 Nov 18
2
RINSTALL with doc clobbers function.html
In R 0.63 RINSTALL of a package with documentation still appears to clobber
R/doc/html/function.html and R/doc/html/packages.html so the main help is no
longer available to a user once a package is installed.
I know how to work around this for my own purposes, but I hesitate to release a
package that would do this to some unsuspecting user.
Paul Gilbert
2017 Nov 17
2
HTML documentation is not in the expected location
Since I have updated my Linux system, and consequently re-installed R, I
am unable to see HTML documentation which I used to access via a web
browser. To be more specific, my R installation is declared to be here:
> R RHOME
/usr/local/lib/R
However, if I look at a location such as
/usr/local/lib/R/library/base/html
this contains only two entries
File: 00Index.html
File: R.css
1998 Nov 18
0
more on RINSTALL with doc clobbers function.html
After some investigation I find that "R INSTALL dse" seems to work well.
Also,
"R REMOVE dse" works but does not clean out ~/.R (which would be pretty
difficult because all users may have this). The result is that a user will have
the impression that the package is installed when it has be remove. (This is
probably not too serious.)
However, "R INSTALL -l rlibs
2017 Nov 17
0
HTML documentation is not in the expected location
On 17/11/2017 10:47 AM, Adelchi Azzalini wrote:
> Since I have updated my Linux system, and consequently re-installed R, I
> am unable to see HTML documentation which I used to access via a web
> browser. To be more specific, my R installation is declared to be here:
>
> > R RHOME
> /usr/local/lib/R
>
> However, if I look at a location such as
>
2015 Oct 29
2
R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch
Deepayan Sarkar <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rainer M Krug <Rainer at krugs.de> wrote:
>> Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote:
>>> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I
>>> |
1998 Jun 14
5
R-beta: R-0.62 is released
I've put up R-0.62.0.tgz up for FTP from Auckland some minutes ago.
As usual, don't get it from there unless you are desperate, but wait
for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site near you within a day or two.
Note that beginning with this version, you need Fortran in some form
or other to compile R. (f2c is good enough)
Here is the relevant part of the CHANGES file:
CHANGES IN R VERSION
1998 Jun 14
5
R-beta: R-0.62 is released
I've put up R-0.62.0.tgz up for FTP from Auckland some minutes ago.
As usual, don't get it from there unless you are desperate, but wait
for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site near you within a day or two.
Note that beginning with this version, you need Fortran in some form
or other to compile R. (f2c is good enough)
Here is the relevant part of the CHANGES file:
CHANGES IN R VERSION
1998 Jun 14
5
R-beta: R-0.62 is released
I've put up R-0.62.0.tgz up for FTP from Auckland some minutes ago.
As usual, don't get it from there unless you are desperate, but wait
for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site near you within a day or two.
Note that beginning with this version, you need Fortran in some form
or other to compile R. (f2c is good enough)
Here is the relevant part of the CHANGES file:
CHANGES IN R VERSION
1997 Apr 24
1
R-beta: multiple binary types
I've modified the "$RHOME/bin/R" and "$RHOME/cmd/filename" so that you
can use the same directories for multiple machines. That is, machines
running various flavors of UNIX can access the same directories.
The modified structure adds the directories
$RHOME/bin/$OSTYPE/
$RHOME/lib/$OSTYPE/
to hold the machine specific binaries.
For instance, here the $RHOME directory
1997 Apr 24
1
R-beta: multiple binary types
I've modified the "$RHOME/bin/R" and "$RHOME/cmd/filename" so that you
can use the same directories for multiple machines. That is, machines
running various flavors of UNIX can access the same directories.
The modified structure adds the directories
$RHOME/bin/$OSTYPE/
$RHOME/lib/$OSTYPE/
to hold the machine specific binaries.
For instance, here the $RHOME directory
1999 Jul 28
1
problem to install R-0.64.2 on mips-sgi-irix6.4
Dear all,
I hope the following problem haven't been discussed here recently (I
could not find anything about it the help archive files) :
I tried to compile R-0.64.2 from the source files without much
success...
the last lines from the output of the ./configure command were :
----------------------------------------------------------
R is now configured for mips-sgi-irix6.4
Source
2019 May 13
2
Interprocedural DSE for -ftrivial-auto-var-init
> On May 10, 2019, at 8:59 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry for delay, I was busy with other stuff.
> CTMark results.
>
> dse is the current DSE.
> dsem is my experimental module level DSE.
> dsem runs after dse, so it's additionally deleted stores.
>
> -O3
> dse - Number of stores deleted
2020 Aug 18
7
[RFC] Switching to MemorySSA-backed Dead Store Elimination (aka cross-bb DSE)
Hi,
Over the past six months, a MemorySSA-backed DSE implementation has been added to LLVM and it now covers almost all cases the existing DSE implementation does, plus adding a major new capability: eliminating stores across basic blocks. Thanks everyone involved with reviews, testing & patches!
I think now would be a good time to start working towards switching to use MemorySSA-backed DSE