similar to: package help clobbers R help (html)

In R 0.63 RINSTALL of a package with documentation still appears to clobber R/doc/html/function.html and R/doc/html/packages.html so the main help is no longer available to a user once a package is installed. I know how to work around this for my own purposes, but I hesitate to release a package that would do this to some unsuspecting user. Paul Gilbert

After some investigation I find that "R INSTALL dse" seems to work well. Also, "R REMOVE dse" works but does not clean out ~/.R (which would be pretty difficult because all users may have this). The result is that a user will have the impression that the package is installed when it has be remove. (This is probably not too serious.) However, "R INSTALL -l rlibs

I have my DSE library working fairly well now with 0.62.1. It required a few changes because of the changes to R INSTALL and "xxx<-" functions. I would like to tar up a new version soon but 1/ for testing I have been using a kludge in .First.lib to select the first element of section - since I happen to know that is the element I need given the way I have $RLIBS set. This argument

I put some documentation in a file dse/man/dse.Rd in and did R INSTALL -l rlibs dse This built the copies of dse.Rd in rlibs/dse/{help latex html}. It also wrote over R/doc/html/function.html and R/doc/html/packages.html, effectively clobbering all the R documentation. Also, the link that gets put in R/doc/html/packages.html points to R/library/dse/html/00Index.html rather than

I'm trying to use R CMD Rd2dvi and I end up at a Latex (I think) command prompt. What's missing or what am I suppose to do? Paul Gilbert _______ paul at breman:/apps/dse-versions/2000.6/dse#R CMD Rd2dvi syskern This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3) (Rd2.tex LaTeX2e <1998/12/01> Babel <v3.6k> and hyphenation patterns for american, french, german, ngerman, nohyphenation,

Hi all, I am working on a project that requires LLVM DeadStoreElimination However, when I look through the code in Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp, I see the following: // Ignore any store where we can't find a local dependence. // FIXME: cross-block DSE would be fun. :) if (!InstDep.isDef() && !InstDep.isClobber()) continue; I have two questions on this

For the (slightly) adventurous among you: We plan to roll out R 0.62.3 next Friday. In order to root out remaining bugs before the release, I'd like to encourage you to try it out on your system. Since there is a risk of destabilising things whenever you mess with the configure scripts, we won't attack installation problems on unusual platforms after this week. We also won't take

Hello R-ists Have been lurking on the list for a while, I have noticed recently two problems: 1 There seem to be problems with installing R on SuSe Linux version 5.3. As the list only gets problems and doesn't log the successes, has anyone successfully loaded R on SuSe 5.3? Is this a feature of 0.62.3 only or do the problems apply also to earlier versions. 2 There was a list of

Solaris 2.6, R Version 0.63.0 (November 14, 1998) Version 0.62.4 (October 24, 1998) > seq(0.15, 0.70, 0.05) [1] 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 The much reviled (on r-help) 0.62.3 got such simple cases right (even if 0.62.1 did not). Jim Lindsey insisted that such bugs are reported here, so I am. And yes, this is a real example and leads to an

> On May 10, 2019, at 8:59 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sorry for delay, I was busy with other stuff. > CTMark results. > > dse is the current DSE. > dsem is my experimental module level DSE. > dsem runs after dse, so it's additionally deleted stores. > > -O3 > dse - Number of stores deleted

Hello all, I looking at package dse or vars or mAr I know how to simulate a VAR(p) process, my problem is that most of those processes are unstable (not weakly stationary). Do anybody know how to generate a random VAR (or VARMA even better) process that is weakly stationary? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/simulating-stable-VAR-process-tp4261177p4261177.html

Hi, Over the past six months, a MemorySSA-backed DSE implementation has been added to LLVM and it now covers almost all cases the existing DSE implementation does, plus adding a major new capability: eliminating stores across basic blocks. Thanks everyone involved with reviews, testing & patches! I think now would be a good time to start working towards switching to use MemorySSA-backed DSE

Can you post numbers for how many stores get eliminated from CTMark? > On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > I tried -Os and effect of new approach significantly increases. > I run regular DSE and immediately myDSE. With -Os myDSE removes more than 50% of DSE number. > Which is expected as -Os inlines less and regular DSE can't

Sorry, I misunderstood the question. The difference between a load and a read-only call is that load can be used as the value of the memory location. E.g. DeadStoreElimination pass removes a store that stores a just loaded value back into the same location. To do this it checks if the stored value is the value of load. Read-only call cannot be used like this. This being said, I don't know if

Andres: FWIW, codegen will do the merge if you turn on global alias analysis for it "-combiner-global-alias-analysis". That said, we should be able to do this merging earlier. -Nirav On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Andres Freund via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2018-09-10 13:42:21 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > I have, in postres,

Hi JF, I've heard that you are interested DSE improvements and maybe we need to be in sync. So far I experimented with following DSE improvements: * Cross-block DSE, it eliminates additional 7% stores comparing to existing DSE. But it's not visible on benchmarks. * Cross-block + Interprocedural analysis to annotate each function argument with: - can read before write - will

Hi, If I try to do this: if(is.R()) data("eg1.DSE.data.diff", package="dse1") model <- est.VARX.ls(eg1.DSE.data.diff) (Page 14 - DSE Package Manual) I obtain a Segment Violation. I use R-1.3.0 and the last dse package version Maximino Ameneiro Gomez -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

I am having problems with the package dse. I just installed R 2.2.1 and reinstalled all packages. I am running Windows XP Pro with all updates. Below there are two examples of error messages generated when trying to execute some simple programs. The code was taken directly from the package documentation. Any help on this will be greatly appreciated. Merry Christmas Fernando

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:02 PM Amara Emerson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Apr 15, 2019, at 1:51 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi JF, > > > > I've heard that you are interested DSE improvements and maybe we need to be in sync. > > So far I experimented with

"memory accesses between the malloc and the memset without an expensive linear scan of the block/function" (1) do you mean just use "memoryIsNotModifiedBetween" function in DSE to check it? x = maloc(..); memset(x, ...) (2) GetUnderlyingObject would give me Value * (from malloc) ? Also another case: memset(s, 0, len); // len > 1 return strlen(s); // optimize to 0 (3)