Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "R-beta: base not loading"
1998 Feb 25
1
R-beta: Re: dse+redhat 4.2 problem
>R INSTALL dse rlibs
>Installing package `dse' ...
>libs
>gcc -g -fpic -I/usr/local/R-0.61/include -c dsefor.c -o dsefor.o
>/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits
>/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits
>...
>is there something wrong with my gcc or is there some
>option missing somewhere?
>I suspect the problem might have to do with
1998 Feb 25
1
R-beta: Re: dse+redhat 4.2 problem
>R INSTALL dse rlibs
>Installing package `dse' ...
>libs
>gcc -g -fpic -I/usr/local/R-0.61/include -c dsefor.c -o dsefor.o
>/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits
>/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits
>...
>is there something wrong with my gcc or is there some
>option missing somewhere?
>I suspect the problem might have to do with
1998 Dec 03
1
which compiler
Hello,
This is perhaps a little off-topic, but I am curious as to what compilers
people use to compile R (under unix/linux). I am primarily interested in
the use of egcs or gcc, g77 or f2c, etc. It seems most of the gcc
interest and development is towards egcs, and while a gcc 2.8.1/g77
combination did work and compile R on my primary linux machine, it also
managed to produce kernels that did
1998 Oct 07
2
R-beta: R0.62.3 installation on RedHat 5.0
I have R-0.62.3 and RedHat 5.0 with fort77.
At the office R is running but when I install a package, eg. 'akima'
I get a message
make: f77: Command not found
'R INSTALL library' does not accept fort77, but R installation checks
f77/g77/fort77. Is there an easy way to edit some file and replace
f77/g77 with fort77?
At home I have the same R and Linux versions, but when
2000 May 25
9
problem on upgrading to RH6.2 (was problem with ts pack
plummer at iarc.fr said:
> On 24-May-00 Prof Brian D Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2000, Christian Posse wrote:
> >> >> I just encountered a problem with the ts package: >> >> >
> library(ts) >> Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local),
> as.logical(now)) : >> unable to load shared library >> "/usr/
>
1999 Jun 10
3
Compilation fails (PR#209)
Full_Name: Frank Beimfohr
Version: 0.64.1, devel.
OS: Solaris 2.5.1
Submission from: (NULL) (129.217.131.31)
I try to compile R on my Sparc 4 (Solaris 2.5.1) but the compilation fails. I
tried
the developer-version and the contributed 0.64.1-Version.
I start configure with the --g77-Option. During the compilation it stops with an
error, which says that the R/src/library/modreg/src/bsplvd.f
2001 Feb 01
1
configure bug in R-1.2.1 and earlier (PR#836)
Unless I force the Fortran compiler through --with-g77, configure fails to
find and use the installed g77. I would submit a patch for configure.in,
but I can't quite follow the logic in configure.in.
$ ./configure
creating cache ./config.cache
[...]
checking for main in -lm... yes
checking for g77... /usr/local/gnu/bin/g77
checking for fort77... (cached) /usr/local/gnu/bin/g77
checking for
1999 Apr 01
1
PLATFORMS
Only three entries thus far.
Please keep them coming in.
-k
NAME Martyn Plummer
EMAIL plummer@iarc.fr
VERSION 0.63.3
PLATFORM i386-unknown-linux
SYSTEM Redhat 5.1
CC/FC/MAKE gcc/egcs-g77/make
NAME Douglas Bates
EMAIL bates@stat.wisc.edu
VERSION 0.63.3
PLATFORM i386-unknown-linux
SYSTEM Debian 2.1
CC/FC/MAKE egcs/g77/make
NAME Thomas
2000 Jun 28
1
R-1.1.0 - f2c in configure
When trying to build R-1.1.0, the configure script reported no Fortran
compiler, even though '/usr/bin/f2c' was present, and R-1.0.1 had found
and successfully used this. I traced this to an apparent typo in line
2067 of configure:
for name in g77 fort77 f77 f90 xlf cf77 fc; do
changing this to:
for name in g77 fort77 f77 f90 xlf cf77 f2c; do
allowed the script to 'find'
2000 Jun 19
2
fortran compile problem with R-1.1.0
Hello List,
Knowing I would eventually need to ask for help on the list, I've held
off my thanks and congratulations on the 1.+ releases of R. I am amazed
at the dedication of the R-core team, and do add my applause and thanks.
I've had a compile problem with the latest version which has not
occurred before. I'm compiling under:
platform sparc-sun-solaris2.6
arch sparc
2006 Jan 29
2
R 2.1.1 installation fails under Suse 10.0 (PR#8533)
Full_Name: Sigbert Klinke
Version: 2.1.1
OS: Suse Linux 10.0 (Full DVD)
Submission from: (NULL) (141.20.100.252)
Suse 10.0 installs only a Fortran 95 compiler with g77 compability mode. Using
this leads in "configure" to an abortion with problems about "FPICFLAGS".
Deinstalling g77 compatiblity mode, using f2c, compiles R. But after calling R()
the program shows its entrance
1998 Aug 18
2
R-beta: Debian 2.0 and R
I am trying to compile R on my Debian 2.0 machine. I have both gcc and
egcc (required for g77). Since the configure script doesn't check for
egcc I used CC=egcc (even used LDCMD=egcc) in the config.site file.
Everything worked fine until the final binary where it tries to use gcc
.......
egcc -g -I../include -c unique.c
egcc -g -I../include -c util.c
egcc -g -I../include -c
1999 Sep 26
1
install problem -- libg2c
Hi, there
I'm totally new to this. I used to use SPLUS, but think maybe
useful to try R at home.
But seems it doesn't like me. I got error message says
ld: cannot open -lg2c: No such file or directory
My OS is openlinux 2.3. I use egcs-2.91.66. I searched under
/lib/egcs-2.91.66/ but found no libg2c.a. There's only a libgcc.a.
Thought maybe g77 people changed
2004 Aug 29
1
Re: [R] R on gentoo amd64 (gcc 3.3.3) is unstable --- no!
Dear Dirk,
I have had the exactly same problem like Ivo and his solution worked for me.
Hence the USE=f77 flag is NOT a typo but a Gentoo quirk.
As far as modifying the configure script is concerned, I believe that it is certainly
possible to perform said check (if 'f77 --version == f2c' then die)
only on x86_64 platforms.
And I'd argue it is f2c's fault. AMD64 linux distros have
1998 Apr 02
2
f2c
I have a problem with my dynamically loaded code in R not finding pow_ii, which
for some time I thought was because library f2c is not on my Sparcstation.
However, I have now been experiencing the same problem in Linux, with all the
proper libraries in place.
My incomplete understanding of elf and shared libraries does not help, but when
compiling a complete program I usually muddle through.
2005 Nov 03
4
[LLVMdev] llvm-test configure problem
Following the instructions here:
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run
I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory.
./configure
--with-llvmgccdir=/localhome/tbrethou/cfrontend/sparc/llvm-gcc/
--with-f2c=/home/vadve/shared/localtools/sparc
--with-llvmsrc=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm
--with-llvmobj=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm
Error:
[cut lots of config output]
checking
2004 Aug 29
1
Re: [R] R on gentoo amd64 (gcc 3.3.3) is unstable --- no!
My appologies, this estimation is about right,
I spent last week at COMPSTAT in prague and didn't follow the list
closely.
Inspite of this fact I believe my posting is not entirely out of date.
regards
Diman Todorov
------------------------------
You are 8 days behind the times -- take a look at the current R-devel.
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Diman Todorov wrote:
> Dear Dirk,
> I
2005 Mar 09
3
R-2.0.1 Gentoo g77 problem
Hello,
I use Gentoo and I can't get R 2.0.1 to compile. I used the portage system, Gentoo's source package sytem, and after it uncompresses the source to R, it says that I don't have a fortran compiler. It told me to use f77 flag and re-emerge gcc, which I did with the f77 and fortran flags, but it still won't compile. Does anyone have any ideas? I suspect that gcc has changed
2000 Nov 21
2
help installing packages
I was trying to install a package but received this error message:
>R INSTALL KernSmooth_2.22-3.tar.gz
Installing package `KernSmooth' ...
libs
g77 -fPIC -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce -g -c blkest.f -o blkest.o
make: g77: Command not found
make: *** [blkest.o] Error 127
Must I have a fortran compiler to install R packages?
Thanks for any advice,
Rose Hoberman
1999 Jun 09
4
packages with FORTRAN code
Recent sensible changes to the dynload mechanism have made an old
problem resurface: how should we deal with packages which contain
Fortran code and may need to be linked against additional libraries
such as -lf2c?
The current consensus is that extra Fortran libraries maybe needed are
handled via the make variable FLIBS, and that `-lf2c' or `-lg2c' are
added by default if g77 is used.