similar to: f2c

Jim, you should ask questions like these on R-devel. There are more proficient Linux gurus on there than me [that's why I CC:]. >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Lindsey <jlindsey@luc.ac.be> writes: Jim> Martin, Here is an additional problem with my libraries: the Jim> Kalman filtering, written in Fortran, uses complex arithmetic. Jim> On my Red Hat 5,

I was hoping fatal: relocation error: symbol not found: pow_ii: referenced in .../dsefor.so would disappear in R 0.6x, but it has not. I believe this is suppose to come from the f2c lib, but I seem to need just a couple of routines: nm -u dsefor.so Undefined symbols from dsefor.so: .umul pow_dd pow_ii pow_ri For my own purposes I could compile with fortran but that makes it much

>>>>> Thomas Lumley writes: > On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Kurt Hornik wrote: >> Thomas, >> >> Could you add the "-lf2c" at the end of the line >> @$(LD) $(SHLIBLDFLAGS) -o $(LIBNAME).so $(OBJS) >> in acepack's src-c/Makefile? >> >> I ran across an identical pow_dd problem recently with another package. >> Did we always need

>> I'm a bit confused about this discussion, but since I don't have f2c on ... >A lot of Fortran code doesn't require any libf2c routines. When routines >are needed the most common ones are the exponentiation routines pow_dd, >pow_ii and pow_di (pow_ri is for single precision reals and so is less >needed in R, which uses double precision). However, *some* fortran

> If we don't assume that everyone has f2c then people distributing > libraries need to distribute all or part of libf2c. Source to libf2c is > readily available. I'm a bit confused about this discussion, but since I don't have f2c on the computer I've been using the past week, I assume most of the necessary parts on this library have been distributed with R (but I

I have an hp9000/c160 with hpux10.20+gcc2.7.2. When I try the example in the ace help I get: > library(acepack) > ?ace > TWOPI <- 8*atan(1) > x <- runif(200,0,TWOPI) y <- exp(sin(x)+rnorm(200)/2) a <- avas(x,y) /usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: pow_dd (code) from /home/buyuk/R-0.50-a1/lib/acepack.so ABORT instruction (core dumped)

Batch: For me, batch in its present state is broken and useless. My primary need for batch is to produce a final output file of a session after I have worked out a sequence of procedures. I save my instructions in a file that I can source, then run it in batch to have a copy of input and output together. (If there was a log file (or dribble), this problem would be solved.) At present, there are

plummer at iarc.fr said: > On 24-May-00 Prof Brian D Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2000, Christian Posse wrote: > >> >> I just encountered a problem with the ts package: >> >> > > library(ts) >> Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), > as.logical(now)) : >> unable to load shared library >> "/usr/ >

Hello: I first tried it by using ./configure with the source files, but found that there is a huge problem with the gcc-g77 package, then I tried using the RPM obtained from CRAN, getting the following, the first of which appears to be another manifestation of the g77 problem: linux:/tmp # rpm -i R-base-2.0.0-1.i586.rpm warning: R-base-2.0.0-1.i586.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID a3278da3

>R INSTALL dse rlibs >Installing package `dse' ... >libs >gcc -g -fpic -I/usr/local/R-0.61/include -c dsefor.c -o dsefor.o >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >... >is there something wrong with my gcc or is there some >option missing somewhere? >I suspect the problem might have to do with

>R INSTALL dse rlibs >Installing package `dse' ... >libs >gcc -g -fpic -I/usr/local/R-0.61/include -c dsefor.c -o dsefor.o >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >... >is there something wrong with my gcc or is there some >option missing somewhere? >I suspect the problem might have to do with

When trying to build R-1.1.0, the configure script reported no Fortran compiler, even though '/usr/bin/f2c' was present, and R-1.0.1 had found and successfully used this. I traced this to an apparent typo in line 2067 of configure: for name in g77 fort77 f77 f90 xlf cf77 fc; do changing this to: for name in g77 fort77 f77 f90 xlf cf77 f2c; do allowed the script to 'find'

Last Friday my computer monitor was messed up by on-line patches update. I had to reinstall everything from the o.s. and all applications on top of it. I have downloaded R source from the official site. I have uncompressed the archive and ran the configure as root in /usr/local/bin. The configuration procedure dies writing: *configure: error: Neither an F77 compiler nor f2c found * but actually

Hello, I decided to try to compile R version 1.0.0 on my home-hacked linux system. This is not a conventional distribution, but has been upgraded countless numbers of times (I think it started as a 1.2.13). It's up to 2.2.13 (kernel version) and I still use gcc 2.7.2.3. I have managed to deal with the fortran part of R with f2c. As it turns out I can compile the program OK, but when it

Hi, there I'm totally new to this. I used to use SPLUS, but think maybe useful to try R at home. But seems it doesn't like me. I got error message says ld: cannot open -lg2c: No such file or directory My OS is openlinux 2.3. I use egcs-2.91.66. I searched under /lib/egcs-2.91.66/ but found no libg2c.a. There's only a libgcc.a. Thought maybe g77 people changed

Does anyone have a need to use f2c rather than a Fortran compiler to build R? It is yet one more thing to test, and as it only works on 32-bit platforms it is something that I will shortly no longer be able to test. -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865

Hi, I appear to have a slight problem compiling R0.65.0 under Linux (slackware) using g77. By simply typing configure then make, I obtain a binary which when "ldd" does not contain the f2c library. I therefore cannot load any libraries containing fortran code (I obtain unresolved symbol messages from R.X11 and an unable to load shared library from dyn.load(file)). If I change the

I am beginning a much-delayed update of odesolve to include several ordinary differential equation solvers from the Livermore package ODEPACK. These are much-used and reliable Fortran codes, and I plan (as I did for lsoda in the current odesolve package) to make as few changes as possible to the Fortran 77 code. However, recently someone wanted to make nested calls to lsoda, which will not work,

I am new to Linux and its ways, and so I am having a bit of trouble compiling R. The system I am using is Caldera Open Linux 2.4. I have egcs and g77 version 2.91.66 installed and they seem to work fine. When I try to run the configure script for R, it quits at the test of g77 with an error "Can't find -lg2c". Does this error mean I am missing a library, and if so, which one?

The newest version of R for Unix (version R-0.50-a4) is now (or will soon be) available from the following sites. NORTH AMERICA: http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/Alpha EUROPE: ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/R/ ftp://statlab.uni-heidelberg.de/pub/mirrors/auckland/R/ JAPAN: ftp://ftp.u-aizu.ac.jp/pub/lang/R/ NEW ZEALAND: ftp://stat.auckland.ac.nz/pub/R/