similar to: as.name is not idempotent

Hi all, Just a quick question about the idempotence of an intrinsic function. Is there a way to specify that an intrinsic function is idempotent? I am trying to give as much information about the intrinsic function I added to LLVM so that LLVM can do optimizations otherwise disabled. Thanks a lot in advance. Bin

Dear all, I have been working on an idempotent version of apply, such that applying a function f(x) = x (ie. force) returns the same array (or a permutation of it depending on the order of the margins): a <- array(1:27, c(2,3,4)) all.equal(a, iapply(a, 1, force)) all.equal(a, iapply(a, 1:2, force)) all.equal(a, iapply(a, 1:3, force)) all.equal(aperm(a, c(2,1,3)), iapply(a, 2, force))

As part of PhD research I integrated support for code generation of idempotent (re-executable) code regions into LLVM, along with a supporting IR-level analysis to identify and demarcate large "semantically" idempotent regions [1]. Some have expressed interest the code, so here is a link that contains some documentation and pointers to the source hosted on GitHub:

Our code calls del_vqs multiple times, assuming it's idempotent. commit 3ec7a77bb3089bb01032fdbd958eb5c29da58b49 virtio_pci: free up vq->priv broke this assumption, by adding kfree there, so multiple calls cause double free. Fix it up. Fixes: 3ec7a77bb3089bb01032fdbd958eb5c29da58b49 Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin at oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst

Our code calls del_vqs multiple times, assuming it's idempotent. commit 3ec7a77bb3089bb01032fdbd958eb5c29da58b49 virtio_pci: free up vq->priv broke this assumption, by adding kfree there, so multiple calls cause double free. Fix it up. Fixes: 3ec7a77bb3089bb01032fdbd958eb5c29da58b49 Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin at oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst

as.name(as.name("ss")) gives an error in R (0.90 and earlier) but should of course give the same as simply as.name("ss") This reminds me of similar bug/problem... which I don't recall. Yes, I should build tests like these into "make test-Specific" .. Martin --please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform = sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 arch =

Thanks for your reply, Philip. You are right, when I use LLVM-3.8, the 'argmemonly' shows up. Previously, I use LLVM-3.7. I think idempotent is what I want. Can you tell me how to add idempotent attribute to the function? Thanks. Regards, Xiangyang 2016-03-24 14:30 GMT-07:00 Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>: > > > On 03/24/2016 12:45 PM, Xiangyang Guo via

Dear collegues, How can I get the name of a variable (and not the variable) within a function ? For instance, in the following function, I'd like to create a variable in the dataframe df with the same name to the variable passed in var: prova <- function( var ) { df <- as.data.frame(matrix(nr=20,nc=0)) df[["here"]] <- seq(min(var), max(var), le= 20) # df } for

Hi peoples, I'm trying to work out a function which will allow me to relace column names on the basis of substrings within the existing names. e.g. I'd like: blah.Na blah2.Na blah3.Mg blah4.Mg blah5.K blah6.K R1 x x x x x x R2 x x x x x x ... to become: Na (%) Na (%) Mg (%) Mg

> From: Ko-Kang at xtra.co.nz > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:25:00 +1300 > > This might be better discussed on the ggobi help list, but I failed to > > subscribe to that as mail to ggobi.org is refused .... > > Yes I tried to subscribe to the list a few weeks ago and it refused my > subsription somehow... I think if you use ggobi-help-request at franz.stat.wisc.edu it

Hi folks, I am just getting into rails again after a multi-year stint of mod_perl jobs, which might grant me some newbie-indemnity for the time being - but I''ve found an issue I think warrants discussion. As discussed here - http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionController/RequestForgeryProtection/ClassMethods.html - the CSRF protection feature does not kick in for GET requests. This

The LLVM projects page says this: "We need some way to reason about errno. Consider a loop like this: for () x += sqrt(loopinvariant);" and: "The hard part of this project is figuring out how to describe errno in the optimizer" The important property here is the idempotence of sqrt(): it is potentially side-effecting, but that side effect is independent of the

On 29 June 2015 at 07:37, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > so a regex looking for "system:" vs "system {" should nicely delineate > these. I dunno, I might even put that into the conversion utility and > have it just quit if the file is already in the new format, and always run > it. > ?+1 for the idempotent approach. IMHO much more

Beyond any more general questions of whether pam sessions *should* be run as root, is there an immediate security concern with moving the pam_open_session (and pam_setcred) stuff to the parent (root) process? (E.g., via the patch below.) -- Mike Stone diff -u -r1.4 auth-pam.c --- auth-pam.c 25 Jun 2002 00:45:33 -0000 1.4 +++ auth-pam.c 25 Jun 2002 20:33:41 -0000 @@ -286,6 +286,8 @@

On 03/24/2016 12:45 PM, Xiangyang Guo via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > > When I define an intrinsic function with memory write permission, my > assumption is that we can either attach [IntrReadWriteArgMem] or [] to > the intrinsic function. Based on the comment of the source code , > "IntrReadWriteArgMem - This intrinsic reads and writes only from > memory that one of its

I am embarrassed to have to ask this but can anyone tell me of a Tukey multiple comparisons procedure available for R? I have looked through the search page, through the FAQ, and in the index of V&R (1999), and I still can't find such a thing. I see there is a ptukey function and a qtukey function but that is as far as I got. Do I need to roll my own? -- Douglas Bates

Hello I'm reading up on fitting truncated Weibull distribution to data. There are posts in 2002 that point to this presentation by Prof Bates: http://www.stat.wisc.edu/~bates/JSM2001.pdf but now the file is not there. I can't find it anywhere else, Google doesn't have a cached copy for it. Could someone please give me a copy of this file, if they have it? Thanks and regards,

Martin M has suggested I widen this discussion to R-devel, and > I agree that we should increase them, > but I'm not sure at all about the amount. > > The default could even depend on the architecture (via "./configure").. Views, please. ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Is is not time we increased the defaults a bit? As the base gets bigger I hit

I noticed a change in LLVM's behavior between 3.2 and 3.3/ToT, but I'm not sure if it qualifies as a bug/regression or not. The change is that in 3.3 and tip of trunk, calling ConstantFoldConstantExpression on i64 and (i64 add (i64 add (i64 ptrtoint (i64* getelementptr (i64* null, i32 1) to i64), i64 ptrtoint (i64* getelementptr (i64* null, i32 1) to i64)), i64 15), i64 -16)

My apologies for asking what is doubtless a dumb question, but I have scant experience in R. It would be very convenient in doing lots of plots to be able to do them in a loop that stepped through a vector of variable names. For example one could say x<-("mydates") y<-c("foo1","foo2","foo3") #where "foon" were vectors