similar to: R-alpha: f2c

>> I'm a bit confused about this discussion, but since I don't have f2c on ... >A lot of Fortran code doesn't require any libf2c routines. When routines >are needed the most common ones are the exponentiation routines pow_dd, >pow_ii and pow_di (pow_ri is for single precision reals and so is less >needed in R, which uses double precision). However, *some* fortran

I was hoping fatal: relocation error: symbol not found: pow_ii: referenced in .../dsefor.so would disappear in R 0.6x, but it has not. I believe this is suppose to come from the f2c lib, but I seem to need just a couple of routines: nm -u dsefor.so Undefined symbols from dsefor.so: .umul pow_dd pow_ii pow_ri For my own purposes I could compile with fortran but that makes it much

I have a problem with my dynamically loaded code in R not finding pow_ii, which for some time I thought was because library f2c is not on my Sparcstation. However, I have now been experiencing the same problem in Linux, with all the proper libraries in place. My incomplete understanding of elf and shared libraries does not help, but when compiling a complete program I usually muddle through.

>>>>> Thomas Lumley writes: > On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Kurt Hornik wrote: >> Thomas, >> >> Could you add the "-lf2c" at the end of the line >> @$(LD) $(SHLIBLDFLAGS) -o $(LIBNAME).so $(OBJS) >> in acepack's src-c/Makefile? >> >> I ran across an identical pow_dd problem recently with another package. >> Did we always need

Jim, you should ask questions like these on R-devel. There are more proficient Linux gurus on there than me [that's why I CC:]. >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Lindsey <jlindsey@luc.ac.be> writes: Jim> Martin, Here is an additional problem with my libraries: the Jim> Kalman filtering, written in Fortran, uses complex arithmetic. Jim> On my Red Hat 5,

I have an hp9000/c160 with hpux10.20+gcc2.7.2. When I try the example in the ace help I get: > library(acepack) > ?ace > TWOPI <- 8*atan(1) > x <- runif(200,0,TWOPI) y <- exp(sin(x)+rnorm(200)/2) a <- avas(x,y) /usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: pow_dd (code) from /home/buyuk/R-0.50-a1/lib/acepack.so ABORT instruction (core dumped)

I am currently attempting to install R on our DEC Alpha computer, and am having a little trouble. I have f2c installed in lieu of a Fortran compiler, and have installed libf2c in a subdirectory below where f2c lives, although as you can see below, libf2c is not being found during configuration. I'm not sure what I would need to do to rectify this. However, my main problem is with the

Ok, I did the following experiment dyn.load("/usr/local/lib/libf2c.so.2.0") dyn.load("try.so") .Fortran("try", 10.5) where try.so contains the following compiled subroutine subroutine try(x) double precision x write(*,*) x return end It worked just fine (at least here on my FreeBSD machine at home). So it seems that it will be

>R INSTALL dse rlibs >Installing package `dse' ... >libs >gcc -g -fpic -I/usr/local/R-0.61/include -c dsefor.c -o dsefor.o >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >... >is there something wrong with my gcc or is there some >option missing somewhere? >I suspect the problem might have to do with

>R INSTALL dse rlibs >Installing package `dse' ... >libs >gcc -g -fpic -I/usr/local/R-0.61/include -c dsefor.c -o dsefor.o >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >... >is there something wrong with my gcc or is there some >option missing somewhere? >I suspect the problem might have to do with

When trying to build R-1.1.0, the configure script reported no Fortran compiler, even though '/usr/bin/f2c' was present, and R-1.0.1 had found and successfully used this. I traced this to an apparent typo in line 2067 of configure: for name in g77 fort77 f77 f90 xlf cf77 fc; do changing this to: for name in g77 fort77 f77 f90 xlf cf77 f2c; do allowed the script to 'find'

Last Friday my computer monitor was messed up by on-line patches update. I had to reinstall everything from the o.s. and all applications on top of it. I have downloaded R source from the official site. I have uncompressed the archive and ran the configure as root in /usr/local/bin. The configuration procedure dies writing: *configure: error: Neither an F77 compiler nor f2c found * but actually

Batch: For me, batch in its present state is broken and useless. My primary need for batch is to produce a final output file of a session after I have worked out a sequence of procedures. I save my instructions in a file that I can source, then run it in batch to have a copy of input and output together. (If there was a log file (or dribble), this problem would be solved.) At present, there are

Hello, I decided to try to compile R version 1.0.0 on my home-hacked linux system. This is not a conventional distribution, but has been upgraded countless numbers of times (I think it started as a 1.2.13). It's up to 2.2.13 (kernel version) and I still use gcc 2.7.2.3. I have managed to deal with the fortran part of R with f2c. As it turns out I can compile the program OK, but when it

Hi, I appear to have a slight problem compiling R0.65.0 under Linux (slackware) using g77. By simply typing configure then make, I obtain a binary which when "ldd" does not contain the f2c library. I therefore cannot load any libraries containing fortran code (I obtain unresolved symbol messages from R.X11 and an unable to load shared library from dyn.load(file)). If I change the

I am beginning a much-delayed update of odesolve to include several ordinary differential equation solvers from the Livermore package ODEPACK. These are much-used and reliable Fortran codes, and I plan (as I did for lsoda in the current odesolve package) to make as few changes as possible to the Fortran 77 code. However, recently someone wanted to make nested calls to lsoda, which will not work,

I've just added this section to the ReadMe file that accompanies the Red Hat 9 RPMS. I hope this will save people some trouble in the future. Martyn Requirements ------------ Some people have experienced problems satisfying the dependencies of the R RPM. Here is a complete list of requirements, the RPMS that provide them and where to find them on the 3-disk install set. Requirement

Hi, I appear to have a slight problem compiling R0.65.0 under Linux (slackware) using g77. By simply typing configure then make, I obtain a binary which when "ldd" does not contain the f2c library. I therefore cannot load any libraries containing fortran code (I obtain unresolved symbol messages from R.X11 and an unable to load shared library from dyn.load(file)). If I change the

> R code works but the shared objects built from fortran code do not find > the appropriate libs with functions like __pow_ii or __epx at runtime. I used to have endless trouble with __pow_ii which as I recall could be be fixed by the correct incantation of the mix of compiler libraries and LD_LIBRARY_PATH. It seemed to be extremely sensitive and never easy to get right. The problem is

Hi Sorry to bother list members with this query but I can't find any relavent documentation. I just installed R-base-0.50.a4-1.i386.rpm for redhat linux but am missing a library file. rpm complained and so does R. When I try to run R I get /usr/lib/R/bin/R.binary: can't load library 'libf2c.so.0' What else do I need to install - i have g77 0.5.20 which works fine but not f2c as