Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "R-alpha: thoughts on batch and fortran"
1998 May 20
2
libraries; Fortran / -lf2c / Slackware woes
Jim,
you should ask questions like these on R-devel.
There are more proficient Linux gurus on there than me [that's why I CC:].
>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Lindsey <jlindsey@luc.ac.be> writes:
Jim> Martin, Here is an additional problem with my libraries: the
Jim> Kalman filtering, written in Fortran, uses complex arithmetic.
Jim> On my Red Hat 5,
1997 Aug 04
1
R-alpha: Re: your mail
>>>>> Thomas Lumley writes:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Could you add the "-lf2c" at the end of the line
>> @$(LD) $(SHLIBLDFLAGS) -o $(LIBNAME).so $(OBJS)
>> in acepack's src-c/Makefile?
>>
>> I ran across an identical pow_dd problem recently with another package.
>> Did we always need
1999 Sep 01
1
Problems compiling R65.0 (PR#262)
Hi,
I appear to have a slight problem compiling R0.65.0 under Linux
(slackware) using g77. By simply typing configure then make, I obtain
a binary which when "ldd" does not contain the f2c library. I
therefore cannot load any libraries containing fortran code (I obtain
unresolved symbol messages from R.X11 and an unable to load shared
library from dyn.load(file)).
If I change the
2002 Jan 31
1
MacOS X: Packages KernSmooth and cluster won't compile
Hello,
I'm using R 1.40 on MacOS X X.1.2 (installed via the fink package manager).
To upgrade my installed packages, I tried to use update.packages() today.
All went well for most packages, with the exception of KernSmooth and
cluster. In both cases, libraries were not found although I think they are
present.
Here's what happened:
----------------------------------
>
1997 Jul 31
1
R-beta: acepack with 0.50-a1
I have an hp9000/c160 with hpux10.20+gcc2.7.2. When I try the example
in the ace help I get:
> library(acepack)
> ?ace
> TWOPI <- 8*atan(1)
> x <- runif(200,0,TWOPI)
y <- exp(sin(x)+rnorm(200)/2)
a <- avas(x,y)
/usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: pow_dd (code) from /home/buyuk/R-0.50-a1/lib/acepack.so
ABORT instruction (core dumped)
1998 Aug 18
2
R-beta: Debian 2.0 and R
I am trying to compile R on my Debian 2.0 machine. I have both gcc and
egcc (required for g77). Since the configure script doesn't check for
egcc I used CC=egcc (even used LDCMD=egcc) in the config.site file.
Everything worked fine until the final binary where it tries to use gcc
.......
egcc -g -I../include -c unique.c
egcc -g -I../include -c util.c
egcc -g -I../include -c
1997 Jul 31
1
R-alpha: More problems with R0.50.a1
More problems...
1) when -lf2c is used for linking as in the standard Makefile in
src/main, it does not include the library as shown by ldd on my
slackware linux 2.0.29 but does on RedHat linux 2.0.27. But with
slackware adding the -L/usr/lib just before -lf2c does include it. On
the other hand readline in the same directory is included both times.
(We need the f2c library for complex numbers in
2001 Jul 06
4
How to build R-1.3.0 under HP-UX 11.00
Hello,
I am new in R and I am delighted with it, so I am trying to bulid R-1.3.0
from sources under HP-UX 11.00 using f2c and X11 support. Configuration
phase is OK but using make I have errors:
gcc -Wl,-E -o R.bin CConverters.o Rdynload.o RNG.o apply.o
arithmetic.o array.o attrib.o bind.o builtin.o charac
ter.o coerce.o colors.o complex.o connections.o context.o cov.o cum.o
dcf.o
2001 Jul 06
4
How to build R-1.3.0 under HP-UX 11.00
Hello,
I am new in R and I am delighted with it, so I am trying to bulid R-1.3.0
from sources under HP-UX 11.00 using f2c and X11 support. Configuration
phase is OK but using make I have errors:
gcc -Wl,-E -o R.bin CConverters.o Rdynload.o RNG.o apply.o
arithmetic.o array.o attrib.o bind.o builtin.o charac
ter.o coerce.o colors.o complex.o connections.o context.o cov.o cum.o
dcf.o
1997 Aug 28
1
R-alpha: pow_ii
>> I'm a bit confused about this discussion, but since I don't have f2c on
...
>A lot of Fortran code doesn't require any libf2c routines. When routines
>are needed the most common ones are the exponentiation routines pow_dd,
>pow_ii and pow_di (pow_ri is for single precision reals and so is less
>needed in R, which uses double precision). However, *some* fortran
1997 Sep 10
1
R-alpha: New Version Available
The newest version of R for Unix (version R-0.50-a4) is now (or will
soon be) available from the following sites.
NORTH AMERICA:
http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/Alpha
EUROPE:
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/R/
ftp://statlab.uni-heidelberg.de/pub/mirrors/auckland/R/
JAPAN:
ftp://ftp.u-aizu.ac.jp/pub/lang/R/
NEW ZEALAND:
ftp://stat.auckland.ac.nz/pub/R/
1998 Apr 02
2
f2c
I have a problem with my dynamically loaded code in R not finding pow_ii, which
for some time I thought was because library f2c is not on my Sparcstation.
However, I have now been experiencing the same problem in Linux, with all the
proper libraries in place.
My incomplete understanding of elf and shared libraries does not help, but when
compiling a complete program I usually muddle through.
2000 May 25
9
problem on upgrading to RH6.2 (was problem with ts pack
plummer at iarc.fr said:
> On 24-May-00 Prof Brian D Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2000, Christian Posse wrote:
> >> >> I just encountered a problem with the ts package: >> >> >
> library(ts) >> Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local),
> as.logical(now)) : >> unable to load shared library >> "/usr/
>
1997 Aug 21
2
R-alpha: libf2c as a shared library
Ok, I did the following experiment
dyn.load("/usr/local/lib/libf2c.so.2.0")
dyn.load("try.so")
.Fortran("try", 10.5)
where try.so contains the following compiled subroutine
subroutine try(x)
double precision x
write(*,*) x
return
end
It worked just fine (at least here on my FreeBSD machine at home).
So it seems that it will be
2004 Oct 08
1
problem Installing R 2.0.0 on SuSe 9.1
Hello:
I first tried it by using ./configure with the source files, but found that there is a huge problem with the gcc-g77 package, then I tried using the RPM obtained from CRAN, getting the following, the first of which appears to be another manifestation of the g77 problem:
linux:/tmp # rpm -i R-base-2.0.0-1.i586.rpm
warning: R-base-2.0.0-1.i586.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID a3278da3
1999 Sep 26
1
install problem -- libg2c
Hi, there
I'm totally new to this. I used to use SPLUS, but think maybe
useful to try R at home.
But seems it doesn't like me. I got error message says
ld: cannot open -lg2c: No such file or directory
My OS is openlinux 2.3. I use egcs-2.91.66. I searched under
/lib/egcs-2.91.66/ but found no libg2c.a. There's only a libgcc.a.
Thought maybe g77 people changed
1999 Nov 16
1
Installation of package fails (PR#328)
Full_Name: Thomas Langhans
Version: 0.65
OS: Solaris 7
Submission from: (NULL) (129.217.131.31)
I tried to install the package "leap" on our Sun Enterprise 400 running Solaris
7,
but it fails: cause the g77 doesn't compiles the fortran-sources properly, I
translated them with f2c to c-source.
Running R INSTALL produces the following message:
Installing package `leaps' ...
2000 Feb 22
1
R-0.99 installation on UNIX
{message bounced because it has "$$$" in it.
manually approved by list maintainer -- MM}
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:03:35 +0100
> From: jens <jniesch at gwdg.de>
>
> I have trouble to install R on Sparc Sun Solaris 2.6.
> make returns the error message:
> Undefined symbol first referenced in file
> d_lg10 ../appl/libappl.a(uncmin.o)
> d_sign
2000 Oct 31
1
Compiling R in Caldera Linux
I am new to Linux and its ways, and so I am having a bit of trouble compiling R.
The system I am using is Caldera Open Linux 2.4. I have egcs and g77 version
2.91.66 installed and they seem to work fine. When I try to run the
configure script for R, it quits at the test of g77 with an error "Can't find
-lg2c".
Does this error mean I am missing a library, and if so, which one?
2015 Nov 12
2
Building SPEC CPU2006 Fortran benchmarks with llvm
Hello,
I have built llvm with some added Machine Function Passes and I am trying
to use it to build the SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks. I am using llvm test-suite
to build the benchmarks. I configured the test-suite with "--with-f2c" but
still none of the fortran benchmarks are built or compiled. I tried running
simple and nightly tests. Kindly let me know if I am missing some steps and
if not