similar to: Error: virNetSocketReadWire:904 : Cannot recv data: Input/output error

Hello, I'm trying to install and use libvirt 1.0.4 on an Ubuntu 12.04.2. I compiled libvirt by doing: $ ./configure --with-selinux=no --with-gnutls $ make $ sudo make install Everything works fine and are installed under /usr/local Then I started the libvirtd manually and try to start a linux container that has the following configuration: $ virsh -c lxc:/// dumpxml lxcvm1 <domain

I'm using Libvirt's Java API and connecting to the hypervisor using the same. My program is such that periodic discovery of active VMs is done using Libvirt's functions. However, when I try to perform any VM related operations while the Java code connecting to Qemu is running such as shutdown, start VM using virsh, I end up with : 'libvir: Remote error : cannot recv data: :

What are the standard reasons for this to fail? virNetSocketReadWire:1791 : End of file while reading data: Input/output error -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20230307/7b318c84/attachment.htm>

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:57:24PM +0000, Simon Fairweather wrote: > What are the standard reasons for this to fail? > > virNetSocketReadWire:1791 : End of file while reading data: Input/output > error The socket connection to libvirtd / other daemons was abruptly closed. Essentially you can almost always ignore this error message as being mostly harmless. With regards, Daniel --

Initially, tt was not a problem with the verifier, we were just inserting a wrong instruction in our pass. Also we were able to figure out the error you pointed out and our pass is running as intended!!! Thanks a lot. On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Adarsh Yoga wrote: > >> I was able to solve that >> > > What was wrong? I

Adarsh Yoga wrote: > I was able to solve that What was wrong? I wasn't able to reproduce it and would still like to teach the verifier whatever it missed. but still crashing with the same error saying > "Unreachable executed". I have attached the output with this mail. This time you've got: %1 = load i32** getelementptr inbounds ({ i32* }* @structobj, i64 0, i32

Adarsh Yoga wrote: > Yes. Intially the pass was crashing when the module when the module > verifier was running. I was able to solve that and now it is crashing > when the bit writer pass is running. The output is wrong in @thread_pool_init: <stdin>:44:27: error: '%4' defined with type 'i1' %5 = getelementptr i32* %4, i64 %indvar ; <i32*> [#uses=1]

I was able to solve that but still crashing with the same error saying "Unreachable executed". I have attached the output with this mail. Thanks in advance. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Adarsh Yoga wrote: > >> Yes. Intially the pass was crashing when the module when the module >> verifier was running. I was able to

Yes. Intially the pass was crashing when the module when the module verifier was running. I was able to solve that and now it is crashing when the bit writer pass is running. On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > On 5 May 2010 17:12, Adarsh Yoga <ayoga at umail.iu.edu> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've written a pass

On 5 May 2010 17:12, Adarsh Yoga <ayoga at umail.iu.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I've written a pass that basically does some code transformations to > enable parallel execution of loops. After the transformation llvm runs > BitCode Writer pass , which is aborting with Unreachable Executed error. > I have attached the input llvm code and the output llvm code for reference.

Hi, I've written a pass that basically does some code transformations to enable parallel execution of loops. After the transformation llvm runs BitCode Writer pass , which is aborting with Unreachable Executed error. I have attached the input llvm code and the output llvm code for reference. I am stuck at this problem for a few days now. Please let me know if you are able to find anything

Hi Adarsh, On 11/02/12 09:47, Adarsh Konchady wrote: > My pass in LLVM generates an IR like this > %5 = icmp eq i32 %4, 0 > %7 = or i1 %5, %5 > ;. . . > Since the 'or' instruction is actually not needed(dead code), I replaced all > occurences of %7 with %5. > Now, the 'or' instruction should get deleted. How can I call Dead Code > Elimination pass

Migration without --p2p works just fine, ie. the below works: $ virsh migrate --verbose --copy-storage-all \ --live cvm1 qemu+ssh://kashyapc@devstack3/system Migration: [100 %] Result: - On the source host, the guest is shut off - On the destination host, the guest is live migratied successfully Migration with "--p2p" fails, a simple test below:

Hi Adarsh, to my knowledge there is no publicly available CUDA-Frontend for LLVM yet. The work of Helge Rhodin you mentioned is on the backend-side: It allows to generate PTX code from LLVM IR. It is still being maintained, although I think the currently available source code is a little outdated. There is also a PTX backend in the current version of LLVM that makes use of LLVM's

Hi My libvirt version is 3.4.0,host system is centos 7.4 ,kernel is 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 , when I shutdown domain in virtual system, My program call virDomainMemoryStats, My program blocked in this api. the call stack is #0 0x00007ff242d78a3d in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ff243755ce8 in virNetClientIOEventLoop () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 #2 0x00007ff24375654b in

John, Thanks, this would work. But we are interested in obtaining the instruction that defines/allocates the value of interest. Once we obtain that we can use LoopInfo pass to check whether the basic block containing that definition instruction belongs to the loop in question. Is there a method that returns the defining instruction? Thanks, Adarsh On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:05 AM, John Criswell

My pass in LLVM generates an IR like this %5 = icmp eq i32 %4, 0 %7 = or i1 %5, %5 ;. . . Since the 'or' instruction is actually not needed(dead code), I replaced all occurences of %7 with %5. Now, the 'or' instruction should get deleted. How can I call Dead Code Elimination pass of LLVM from my pass or is there any method to remove that 'or' instruction? Thank you.

Hi, Please let me know how to follow my pass in LLVM by Dead Code Elimination pass of LLVM. getAnalysisUsage(...) only allows me to run passes before my pass. I want to run Dead Code Elimination pass after my pass. Regards, Adarsh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I hesitate to call this a "bug" as I don't know all the history behind the ipfw2 decisions, so let me toss this out there and see I'm just missing something. Overview ======== The negated operator, "not recv any" was taken to mean "any packet never received by an interface" believed to be equivalent to "any packet that originated on the current

Hello all, I'm having troubles with a samba 2.2.2 server (on debian). Some clients are having problems connecting, and are filling the logs with messages like those below. This isn't the first time I've had this problem, nor is it the first site. This is a win98 box I'm having troubles with now - it fails trying to log onto the domain... although I'm fairly sure it affects