similar to: virsh dump

Hello Which is the quickest way to stop KVM guest VM. I am not interested in saving anything; I just have to make sure that VM apps are ended quickly. i) virsh shutdown ii) virsh suspend iii) virsh destroy >From little descriptions I have, looks like destroy is the fastest way and acts like a removal of a power plug. Pls let me know. Thanks >Harish -------------- next part

Hello, Is there a way to determine state of the qemu/kvm guest OS (rebooting/working/hung etc) from the host. I'm not referring to the qemu domain state itself Thanks in advance. >harish -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20120802/020051f2/attachment.htm>

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v2 (previous version were posted to few people by mistake; sorry for that). Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code.

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v2 (previous version were posted to few people by mistake; sorry for that). Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code.

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v2 (previous version were posted to few people by mistake; sorry for that). Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code.

Hello, How can I get 'top' output if the guest VM is stuck spinning and taking 100% cpu. Any other means to debug would be of help. Thanks in adv. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20120918/96153756/attachment.htm>

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v3. Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code. However, this solution requires some changes in baremetal x86 code. First of

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v3. Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code. However, this solution requires some changes in baremetal x86 code. First of

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v3. Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code. However, this solution requires some changes in baremetal x86 code. First of

> Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper at oracle.com> writes: > > > Some kexec/kdump implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use default > > Linux infrastructure and require some support from firmware and/or hypervisor. > > To cope with that problem kexec firmware infrastructure was introduced. > > It allows a developer to use all kexec/kdump features of given firmware

> Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper at oracle.com> writes: > > > Some kexec/kdump implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use default > > Linux infrastructure and require some support from firmware and/or hypervisor. > > To cope with that problem kexec firmware infrastructure was introduced. > > It allows a developer to use all kexec/kdump features of given firmware

All, I''m posting to the Xen-devel list and the OSDL fastboot list. There are a number of Xen folks who''ll want to look at the code. For the fastboot folks, this is mostly intended as an announcement of the port. Please limit your replies to the list(s) that they applies to, thanks :-) A number of people have expressed interest in kexec support for Xen guests. In

Hi all, Here I am sending as attachments patches enabling kexec/kdump support in Xen PV domU. Only x84_64 architecture is supported. There is no support for i386 but some code could be easily reused. Here is a description of patches: - kexec-tools-2.0.3_20120522.patch: patch for kexec-tools which cleanly applies to version 2.0.3, - kexec-kernel-only_20120522.patch: main kexec/kdump kernel

Hi all, Here I am sending as attachments patches enabling kexec/kdump support in Xen PV domU. Only x84_64 architecture is supported. There is no support for i386 but some code could be easily reused. Here is a description of patches: - kexec-tools-2.0.3_20120522.patch: patch for kexec-tools which cleanly applies to version 2.0.3, - kexec-kernel-only_20120522.patch: main kexec/kdump kernel

Hi all, Here I am sending as attachments patches enabling kexec/kdump support in Xen PV domU. Only x84_64 architecture is supported. There is no support for i386 but some code could be easily reused. Here is a description of patches: - kexec-tools-2.0.3_20120522.patch: patch for kexec-tools which cleanly applies to version 2.0.3, - kexec-kernel-only_20120522.patch: main kexec/kdump kernel

On 29.03.20 14:42, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 06:14:12PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: >> https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-v2 >> >> I now have acks for all !virtio-mem changes. I'll be happy to get review >> feedback, testing reports,

On 29.03.20 14:42, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 06:14:12PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: >> https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-v2 >> >> I now have acks for all !virtio-mem changes. I'll be happy to get review >> feedback, testing reports,

On 29.04.20 18:08, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Some paravirtualized devices that add memory via add_memory() and > friends (esp. virtio-mem) don't want to create entries in > /sys/firmware/memmap/ - primarily to hinder kexec from adding this > memory to the boot memmap of the kexec kernel. > > In fact, such memory is never exposed via the firmware (e.g., e820), but > only

On 29.04.20 18:08, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Some paravirtualized devices that add memory via add_memory() and > friends (esp. virtio-mem) don't want to create entries in > /sys/firmware/memmap/ - primarily to hinder kexec from adding this > memory to the boot memmap of the kexec kernel. > > In fact, such memory is never exposed via the firmware (e.g., e820), but > only

Hi Harish, I believe the proper establishment of a connection should be done by libvirt.open() or libvirt.openAuth() or libvirt.openReadOnly(). All of them will return a functional virConnect instance. I'm not sure this segfault is worth to fix since instantiate a virConnect directly is not an expected usage. Hope this information will help you. Best Regards, Hao Liu +86-010-62608262