similar to: Dsync and SIS

Hi, I'm trying to access the IMAP archives with Thunderbird but can't seem to get it to work. I have tried an unencrypted connection, SSL and TLS but with no success. Any ideas? Thanks Alex -- This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information. Unless you are that person, you may not disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested

Hi Timo, Is it OK to have dovecot variables in entries in an LDAP userdb? Say I wanted to set the mail userdb parameter to override mail_location, would it work by having an entry in LDAP (eg for mailMessageStore attrib) like: mdbox:/home/email/%d/%n:INDEX=/home/indexes/%d/%1n/%n:ALT=/home/email_archive/%d/%1n/%n and those % variables will still be expanded by dovecot? Or would I be required

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Avinash Rao <avinash.aol at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Alex Crow<acrow at integrafin.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> Alex, > >> > >> I have been trying to use "root preexec" to add domain users to Power > >> users group on the local workstation, it never works.. > >> >

All, If I set up a BDC with a replicated ldap server, can I point the "ldap backend" and "idmap backend" options *both* to the localhost and enable a referral on the slave so that writes (ie Idmap updates) will be referred to the master server? I'm running debian unstable with openldap 2.4 (and libs) and Samba 3.0.30. I know I should use the new idmap interface but this

I have the same problem as the following: http://threebit.net/mail-archive/asterisk-users/msg36602.html I am using a b410p (Wildcard) in TE mode on 4 channels of ISDN2e and it totally fails to detect incoming DTMF. The newer mISDN drivers have a parameter "dtmfthreshold" where you can tune the volume above which DTMF detection is initiated. However (I've tried it) the newest

Hi there, I am looking into using CTDB between a PDC and a BDC. I assume this is possible! However I have a few questions: 1: Do I have to use tdb2 as an Idmap backend? Can I not stay with ldap? (from the CTDB docs: A clustered Samba install must set some specific configuration parameters clustering = yes idmap backend = tdb2 private dir = /a/directory/on/your/cluster/filesystem It is

Hi all, Since the winbind refactoring in Samba 3.6.0, interdomain trusts between Samba servers seem to be broken in that being able to resolve or modify file permissions on the other domain work only very intermittently (eg about once out of 10 tries). This is regardless of whether I use idmap_rid or idmap_ldap as the backend. I set up two 3.6.0 domain controllers with an XP client attached

Hi there, I am looking into using CTDB between a PDC and a BDC. I assume this is possible! However I have a few questions: 1: Do I have to use tdb2 as an Idmap backend? Can I not stay with ldap? (from the CTDB docs: A clustered Samba install must set some specific configuration parameters clustering = yes idmap backend = tdb2 private dir = /a/directory/on/your/cluster/filesystem It is

I've been running continous dsync backups of our Maildirs for a few weeks now, with the destination dsync server using mdbox and SIS. The idea was that the destination server would act as a warm copy of all our active users data. The active servers are using Maildir, and has: $ df -h /usr/local/atmail/users/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/atmailusers

On 14 Mar 2018, 20:42 +0100, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>, wrote: > > > On 14 March 2018 at 21:17 Nick Rosier < nick+dovecot at bunbun.be> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently running a small home-server with Dovecot. A long time ago > > I configured it with SIS enabled. I would like to stop using SIS. > > > >

Hi, I have recently upgraded a system with a Samba BDC, PDC and a couple of member servers from 3.2.14 to 3.4.9 (and also tested with 3.5.6). There appears to be some problem with Winbind (we need to run it on all servers as we have a trust relationship to a domain at another office). I have an Idmap range set up in our LDAP database. With 3.2.14, all worked well. The Idmap ou would be

Hi, I'm currently running a small home-server with Dovecot. A long time ago I configured it with SIS enabled. I would like to stop using SIS. If I remove sis from mail_attachment_fs will the old mails that are stored in SIS-storage still be accessible? How can I convert all mailboxes to stop using SIS and store attachments back in the mails? Rgds, N.

On 4/9/2018, 11:34:40 AM, Ivan Warren <ivan at vmfacility.fr> wrote: > Le 4/9/2018 ? 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a ?crit?: >> Does doveadm backup backup the attachments as well when using SIS? > As far as I know, it does (it de-shares shared attachments) > > I've used that solution to stop using SIS at one point (it created > more problems than it solved

Hi everyone, I am currently trying to setup our next dovecot server (2.2.18) with SIS enabled, but I have enconutered 1 problem and 1 question: *1) Same attachment, different filenames* I have a feeling a misconfigured something (or forgot to do something) because SIS almost works, but not quite since 3 identical attachment take 3x the space (see end of email for my SIS config). For 3 the

Hello: In case it is defined to use zlib compression, does SIS save attachments compressed? I have found this question replied in the past (2012) and the answer was NO. I ask again just to know if there have been changes or if it is in the roadmap to add compression. I have been testing to migrate from maildir+zlib to mdbox+zlib+sis and the results, in terms of space used, and worst than

Hi, Another day, another dysnc attempt. Using Dovecot v2.2.5.4; I see: # doveadm -v -o imapc_user=user at example.com -o imapc_password=password -o imapc_host=imap.example.com -o imapc_port=993 -o imapc_ssl=imaps -o imapc_ssl_dir=/etc/ssl -o imapc_feature=rfc822.size -o imapc_ssl_verify=no sync -1 -R -u user at example.com imapc: dsync(user at example.com): Info: copy from Drafts: box=Drafts,

On 2012-03-24 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > This is already optionally done in v2.0+dbox. MIME attachments can be > stored in plain binary form if they can be reconstructed back into > their original form. It doesn't break any signed stuff. Hey Timo, Splitting this off into a separate thread... On the question of the existing SIS capability for

Since changeset 8a63f621bd2e I'm one step closer to the perfect working setup. I'm sharing one GID per domain, all it's alias names and accounts. So I can use: mail_attachment_dir = /srv/mail/.SiS/%{gid} In order to avoid permission trouble I've set fs ACL on the .SiS dir: ,--[ getfacl srv/mail/.SiS ]-- | # file: srv/mail/.SiS | # owner: root | # group: root | user::rwx |

How do you do. I have tried to use SiS to deduplicate attachments in mail storage. Unsuccesful. When goes mail with reasonable size, and SiS try to start, I have receive error, when this mail must be delivered for group of receivers (i.e. through aliases). Below is error log, valuable parts of mail addresses masked by X and Y chars Aug 6 16:11:12 mailsrv dovecot: lmtp(xxxxx):

Looking at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat, I do not see much on how to do a migration from Maildir to mdbox. That page isn't quite updated it looks. I have several domains (virtual) with the following storage layout: /var/spool/virtual/$domain. So the users have their mail stored as follows: /var/spool/virtual/domain1/$user/Maildir /var/spool/virtual/domain2/$user/Maildir