Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches similar to: "very impressive"
2011 Dec 11
2
ToDo List Notation
I just joined this mail-list, so I apologize if this has been discussed
before, but:
Has anyone suggested adding a "todo list notation" to Markdown?
Specifically, I'd like to see an open paren, brace or bracket, at the start
of a line, followed by a space, a "/", or a "X", followed by a matching
closing paren, brace, or bracket, followed by a space and more text
2012 Jul 03
1
View with Variable Number of Fields
I''m a relative n00b when it comes to Rails. I''ve gone through Michael
Hartl''s tutorials (both editions, books and screencasts) and I can build a
basic CRUD web app without help. However, for a personal project I''m
working on, I''m lost as to how to move forward. Here''s the situation ...
I have a model called Project with two fields,
2009 Feb 27
0
[LLVMdev] Impressive performance result for LLVM: complex arithmetic
On gcc's side, this is a simple missed opt on the part of builtin lowering.
As a result, the gcc code ends up with a call to muldc3 (complex = 2x2
multiply double) and the llvm code doesn't.
GCC should be fixed in a second, and with that, there is no
appreciable performance difference between the two.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>
2014 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] Impressive amount of warnings
Hi Folks,
We're still seeing an impressive amount of warnings on the buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9/builds/17541/steps/compile/logs/stdio
Seems this is one or two places included from the rest of the world...
Any ideas?
cheers,
--renato
2014 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] Impressive amount of warnings
That started happening after someone changed that in compiler-RT, if
I'm not mistaken. I'm on holidays with little access to the boards...
:(
--renato
On 18 April 2014 16:54, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>
>
> On 18/04/2014 21:29, Renato Golin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> We're still seeing an impressive amount of warnings on the
2009 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] Impressive performance result for LLVM: complex arithmetic
Following a discussion about numerical performance on comp.lang.functional
recently I just tried running a simple C mandelbrot benchmark that uses C99's
complex arithmetic using gcc and llvm-gcc on a 2.1GHz Opteron 2352 running
Debian:
gcc: 5.727s
llvm-gcc: 1.393s
There is still 20% room for improvement but LLVM is >4x faster than gcc here.
Sweet.
Here's the code:
#include