similar to: Another NTP issue (fake leap second)

May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) Cheers, Timo

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote: >> Hi CentOS developers - I?ve been happily using CentOS for several >> years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week, >> however, I noticed that while the items in RHSA-2015:1443 has shown >> up as updates (and announced on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi (Ralph), I'd like to edit my personal page (would be nice to link images from here to the interview); could you please grant me the appropriate permissions? TIA, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLsf9cfg746kcGBOwRAqyOAKCL3MNTytzJQFwTZLlGZK8dosQ6bQCeM9Vc Nb1FSj82NIfv64MfY21MHy4= =KaiJ -----END PGP

Running across some curious stuff with ulimit on CentOS 5.10. We have a non CentOS packaged version of Asterisk (using their packages) that we start at boot time with a typical RC script. Recently it started whining that it couldn't open enough file handles. As we dug further into this, it appears that at boot time, it inherits ulimit from init, which is pretty low: 1024. We've set

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Could anyone with the appropriate rights please create the C3-EOL page? Thanks in advance, Timo - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:50:46 +0200 From: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler at riscworks.net> To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org>

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Nicolas Thierry-Mieg" <Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Woensdag 17 juni 2015 14:46:37 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + Dell Latitude E6420 laptop = thermalshutdown On 06/17/2015 04:49 AM, deoren wrote: > > I'm still puzzled why the laptop appears to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 (and OpenVZ, and some home-brew L2TP daemons, RIPd, BGPd, etc). There's a (VE in OpenVZ speak) virtual machine that has two ethernet interfaces, seen as eth0 and eth1, respectively. Those live in VLANs, but it's not important here. The thing is that on eth1 the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots that illustrate the press release [0] announcing the first collisions at the LHC. Those screenshots show windows and buttons that exactly match my CentOS GNOME Desktop [1]. AFAIK, SuSE/Novell has different skins, as has (Open)Solaris and AIX, for instance. So, has there anybody more

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'd like to translate the orignal page into a german one. http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.5/German Could you (@Ralph) please create it? TIA Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL5+cIfg746kcGBOwRAiQVAJ9QdqD1Pdm5fVte59v7zBdStjWahgCdGDZa 59kYF9j2CQhbMfdH0Raunzo= =TL76

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There's progress... http://press.redhat.com/2010/10/18/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-release-candidate-available-to-partners/ Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMvEWlfg746kcGBOwRAtHpAJ9/ylHRb8hAIBp4mvaNSPN36qrkzACfafrY 628MfhiRdSkK+9FWRuE8wJQ= =NtpF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 thus Karanbir Singh spake: > On 01/05/2011 04:03 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> Sure, this is what I understand. However, does this exclude people >> willing to help (read: raising the manpower of the project rebuilding >> RHEL)? If so, yes, I misunderstood. >> > > Thats bonkers. There *was* a specific callout for help,

On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:45 -0600, Nathan Duehr wrote: > Honestly I don?t know how you guys do it? By not using Windoze ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Bob Marcan wrote: >> >> 1FuckingPrettyRose >> "Sorry, you must use no fewer than 20 total characters." >> 1FuckingPrettyRoseShovedUpYourAssIfYouDon'tGiveMeAccessRightFuckingNow! >> "Sorry, you cannot use punctuation."

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, a german IT news site [0] today posted that Amazon Linux AMI is based on CentOS 5.5 -- is that true? Maybe this would be stuff for the next newsletter... ;) Cheers, Timo http://www.golem.de/1009/78088.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMl2Nxfg746kcGBOwRAg8sAKCelTvLYTNxVBjtOxteb7/hQY2eowCfYFzP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, in May 2015 I reported [0] that I can not import my S/MIME certificate. Issuer is GlobalSign. Jan Horak reassigned it to the nss guys ("This seems to be problem in NSS code, reassigning to nss component"), but then the ticket idled and was eventually closed by EOL of Fedora 21 (though I stated it persists with F22). I just reopened

> On Dec 1, 2014, at 14:48, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and

> > On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >> >> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote: >>> Hi CentOS developers - I?ve been happily using CentOS for several >>> years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week,

Hi list, during the last days there was a discussion going on about the stability of XFS; though I myself used XFS heavily and didn't run into issues yet, I'd like to ask something *before* we create our next generation data storage backend... Les Mikesell wrote in [0] about issues in the combination of XFS and LVM -- however, it was being discussed in context of using 32bit kernels.

Hi list, due to the necessity of having a patched KVM running, I build some new RPMs. However, only kmod-kvm-83-105.27.x86_64.rpm is important to replace the 'original' one as it's the only package that contains the patch. I didn't rename the packages, though, hopefully in order not to break the upgrade path provided to us. The patch adresses following problem: 'Fix a race

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> Equating this to ?vaccination? is a huge stretch. > > Why? It's not just an imperfect analogy it really doesn't work on closer scrutiny. Malware itself is not a good analog to antigens. Vaccinations provide