similar to: kernel parameters for improving gluster writes on millions of small writes (long)

I set up a 3.3 gluster volume for another sysadmin and he has added it to his cluster via automount. It seems to work initially but after some time (days) he is now regularly seeing this warning: "Too many levels of symbolic links" $ df: `/share/gl': Too many levels of symbolic links when he tries to traverse the mounted filesystems. I've been using gluster with static mounts

Hi, I'm a bit curious of error messages of the type "remote operation failed: Stale NFS file handle". All clients using the file system use Gluster Native Client, so why should stale nfs file handle be reported? Regards, /jon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, When reading some files we get this error: md5sum: /path/to/file.xml: Structure needs cleaning in /var/log/glusterfs/mnt-sharedfs.log we see these errors: [2013-12-10 08:07:32.256910] W [client-rpc-fops.c:526:client3_3_stat_cbk] 1-testvolume-client-0: remote operation failed: No such file or directory [2013-12-10 08:07:32.257436] W [client-rpc-fops.c:526:client3_3_stat_cbk]

Despite Joe Landman's sage advice to the contrary, I'm trying to convince an IPoIB volume to service requests from a GbE client via some /etc/hosts manipulation. (This may or may not be related to the automount problems we're having as well.) This has worked (and continues to work) well on another cluster with a slightly older version of gluster - the 3.3.0qa42 version on both server

OK - finished some tests over tcp and ironed out a lot of problems. rdma is next; should be snap now.... [I must admit that this is my 1st foray into the land of IB, so some of the following may be obvious to a non-naive admin..] except that while I can create and start the volume with rdma as transport: ================================== root at pbs3:~ 622 $ gluster volume info glrdma

We're considering implementing gluster for a genomics cluster, and it seems to have some theoretical advantages that so far seem to have been borne out in some limited testing, mod some odd problems with an inability to delete dir trees. I'm about to test with the latest beta that was promised to clear up these bugs, but as I'm doing that, answers to these Qs would be

> Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:29:41 -0700 > From: Harry Mangalam <hjmangalam at gmail.com> > Subject: [Gluster-users] Change NFS parameters post-start > To: gluster-users <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Message-ID: > <CAEib2OnKfENr8NhVwkvpsw21C5QJmzu_=C9j144p2Gkn7KP=LQ at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >

The problem described in the subject appears NOT to be the case. It's not that simultaneous reads and writes dramatically decrease perf, but that the type of /writes/ being done by this app (bedtools) kills performance. If this was a self-writ app or an infrequently used one, I wouldn't bother writing this up, but bedtools is a fairly popular genomics app and since many installations use

Hello! I have GlusterFS installation with parameters: - 4 servers, connected by 1Gbit/s network (760-800 Mbit/s by iperf) - Distributed-replicated volume with 4 bricks and 2x4 redundancy formula. - Replicated volume with 2 bricks and 2x2 formula. I found some trouble: if I try to copy huge amount of files (94000 files, 3Gb size), this process takes terribly long time (from 20 to 40 minutes). I

Hi all: I got basic rsync working (not server mode). Basically it went to another server via ssh, backed up subdireactories and stored on the local server. But I am trying to use the feature of "exclude" and could not get it working rigjt. I am trying to back up /export/home/* (all of users) on another machine but exclude a certain types of files. here is one of my tested exclude

Hi All, I must not understand the uid/gid line in rsyncd.conf. If someone could briefly point out where I've gone wrong, I'd appreciate it. I've created a special user to backup a server which has some users who don't want all their files backed up, so I'm trying to address their concerns by using the uid= and gid= lines in rsyncd.conf to have the rsyncd run with

It may be just me/chrome, but trying to dl the latest gluster results by clicking on the Download button next to the Ant, leads not to a download page but to the info page. It invites you to go back to the gluster.org page from when you just came. And when you click on the alternative 'Download' links (the button on the upper right or the larger "Download GlusterFS" icon

Hi all, I found a discrepancy between the sum() in R and either a sum done in C or Fortran for vector of just 5 elements. The difference is very small, but this is a very small part of a much larger numerical problem in which first and second derivatives are computed numerically. This is part of a numerical method course I am teaching in which I want to compare speeds of R versus Fortran (We

My simple functions were to compare the result with the gfortran compiler sum() function. I thought that the Fortran sum could not be less precise than R. I was wrong. I am impressed. The R sum does in fact match the result if we use the Kahan algorithm. P. I am glad to see that R sum() is more accurate than the gfortran compiler sum. On 16/03/18 11:37 AM, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote:

Greetings, I'm running v3.3.0 on Fedora16-x86_64. I used to have a replicated volume on two bricks. This morning I deleted it successfully: ######## [root at farm-ljf0 ~]# gluster volume stop gv0 Stopping volume will make its data inaccessible. Do you want to continue? (y/n) y Stopping volume gv0 has been successful [root at farm-ljf0 ~]# gluster volume delete gv0 Deleting volume will erase

Dear List- This error is appearing in my log.winbindd log file. The full error is as follows: nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161) user 'RAID' does not exist nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161) user 'BAMBOO_LEAVES_SINGLE.TIF' does not exist To clarify, there is no user by those names (i.e. raid, BAMBOO_LEAVES_SINGLE.TIF) on our DC, but there are share

Virtio is using memory barriers to control the ordering of references to the vrings on SMP systems. When the guest is compiled with SMP support, virtio is only using SMP barriers in order to avoid incurring the overhead involved with mandatory barriers. Lately, though, virtio is being increasingly used with inter-processor communication scenarios too, which involve running two (separate)

Virtio is using memory barriers to control the ordering of references to the vrings on SMP systems. When the guest is compiled with SMP support, virtio is only using SMP barriers in order to avoid incurring the overhead involved with mandatory barriers. Lately, though, virtio is being increasingly used with inter-processor communication scenarios too, which involve running two (separate)

Hi, we do a 1:1 backup from our main raid to a backup raid every night with rsync -a --delete /mnt/raid1/ /mnt/raid2 rsync is 3.09, filesystems are ext3, OS is SLES 11 SP1. The rsync process takes several hours, even if no file has changed at all. Using -vv I see that rsync compares all files every time and that takes long for some hundreds of millions of small files. Can I tell rsync it

Hi all, I am having problems with painfully slow directory listings on a freshly created replicated volume. The configuration is as follows: 2 nodes with 3 replicated drives each. The total volume capacity is 5.6T. We would like to expand the storage capacity much more, but first we need to figure this problem out. Soon after loading up about 100 MB of small files (about 300kb each), the