similar to: [zfs] LZ4 compression algorithm

I've just ordered a Siemens Gigaset C450 IP cordless IP/DECT phone, given that it's supported by asterisk http://www.voipuser.org/review_41.html However, I see that a slightly better Gigaset S450 IP is available for only a slight price premium. Are there any user experiences with the S450 IP? -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org

apt-get update apt-clone upgrade Any first impressions? -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

Hi again, thanks for all the replies to the all in one with ESXi, it was most illuminating. I will use this setup at my dayjob. Now for a slight variation on a theme: N40L with ESXi with raw drive passthrough, with OpenIndiana/napp-it NFS or iSCSI export of underlying devices. This particular setup is for a home VMWare lab, using spare hardware parts I have around. I''m trying to do

----- Forwarded message from Josh Paetzel <josh at ixsystems.com> ----- From: Josh Paetzel <josh at ixsystems.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:55:22 -0700 To: freenas-announce at lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Freenas-announce] FreeNAS 8.3.0-RELEASE User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/ Seem to be real 512 Byte sectors, too. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0

http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/en_US/entry/and_now_page_2 Monday Sep 27, 2010 And now, page 2 To my team: After 20 incredible years at Sun/Oracle, I have decided to try something new. This was a very hard decision, and not one made lightly. I have always enjoyed my work, and still do -- everything from MTS-2 to Sun Fellow to Oracle VP. I love the people I work with and the technology

I have a Solaris 10 U5 system massively patched so that it supports ZFS pool version 15 (similar to U8, kernel Generic_141445-09), live upgrade components have been updated to Solaris 10 U8 versions from the DVD, and GRUB has been updated to support redundant menus across the UFS boot environments. I have studied the Solaris 10 Live Upgrade manual (821-0438) and am unable to find any

----- Forwarded message from Zooko O''Whielacronx <zooko at zooko.com> ----- From: Zooko O''Whielacronx <zooko at zooko.com> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:50:19 -0600 To: Crypto discussion list <cryptography at randombit.net> Subject: Re: [cryptography] rolling hashes, EDC/ECC vs MAC/MIC, etc. Reply-To: Crypto discussion list <cryptography at randombit.net>

Just FYI, flame wars please >/dev/null http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=1120 Solaris No Longer Free 28 Mar ''10 - 10:14 by benr Hot on the heals of Oracle''s revamp of Solaris support, the licensing agreement for free downloads of Solaris 10 have changed. Infoworld broke the news on Friday. Here is the bit in question. Notice this paragraph in the Licensing

Today I updated the firmware on my StorageTek 2540 to the latest recommended version and am seeing radically difference performance when testing with iozone than I did in February of 2008. I am using Solaris 10 U5 with all the latest patches. This is the performance achieved (on a 32GB file) in February last year: KB reclen write rewrite read reread 33554432

Opensolaris this ain''t, but zfs-related nevertheless. ----- Forwarded message from Josh Paetzel <josh at ixsystems.com> ----- From: Josh Paetzel <josh at ixsystems.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:01:24 -0700 To: freenas-announce at lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Freenas-announce] FreeNAS 8.2.0-RC1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120506

I encountered an issue that people using OS-X systems as NFS clients need to be aware of. While not strictly a ZFS issue, it may be encounted most often by ZFS users since ZFS makes it easy to support and export per-user filesystems. The problem I encountered was when using ZFS to create exported per-user filesystems and the OS-X automounter to perform the necessary mount magic. OS-X

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5470 Summary: Make check failures on Solaris 10 with rsync 3.0.3pre2 Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473 Summary: OS-X Leopard Rsync 3.0.3pre2 make check failures Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5472 Summary: FreeBSD 3.0.3pre2 'make check' failures Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297 Summary: merge test fails Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us QAContact:

I'm a long time user of openssh and I was wondering if there is any work towards supporting alternative compression methods in openssh like LZ4? Regards, Mark -- Mark E. Lee <mark at markelee.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message

Thanks for the response, what kind of problematic interactions would occur (other than trying to compress seemingly random data)? Regards, Mark On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 04:02 -0400, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > Compression has some problematic interactions with encryption that > OpenSSH seems to have handled far before anyone else (by having it off > by default). > > On Thursday, October

I see. From reading that wikipedia article, I'm wondering what gets compressed when compression is enabled in openssh. Is it the ciphertext or the cleartext? Regards, Mark On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 15:47 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 10/25/2013 03:23 PM, Mark E. Lee wrote: > > Thanks for the response, what kind of problematic interactions would > > occur (other than

Also nice to know that zlib at openssh.com enables the compression only after authentication, mitigating the known problems with compression and passwords. It is also very hard to do chosen-plaintext attacks on the client to server side (in opposite to HTTPS where that's trivial). And most passwords that are typed after authentications are entered character by character, making them fall under