similar to: New antispam measures on the wiki

Why are you replacing known spammers with these "banned" strings ? This forbids anti-spam filters & programs to do their jobs properly.

Hello, Thanks to some nice people on here and other forums I have pretty much finalized my whole mail system on centos 6.x. With all the checks, greylisting, dev/null of any 8+ spam level SA, I still get a few mails. It seems like everytime I enable a new protectant, the mail stops spamming for a few hours...then the spammers decide I am worthy of using better methods against me..and more

Hi everyone, on a server running samba4 with sssd for nsswitch mapping, I realized recently that on windows workstation in the "folder propery/security tab", users are mapped as "Unix user\userlogin" instead of "DOMAINNAME\userlogin". I guess this is due to the fact that sssd mapping with getent passwd gives me user name without domain name (eg. userlogin), and

Thank you for your helpful hints on debugging this issue. I wanted first to get the mail which generates this error but unfortunately the user already deleted it as well from his trash. Now I got another hint and it looks like this mail had a big attachment to it. Is it possible that spamc generated this error due to the size of the mail? Regards ML On Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:29 AM,

On 21/06/2019 15:39, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I am facing 2 issues now. > The first one is the more critical for me... > > 1. When I switch from sssd to winbind with : > # authconfig --enablekrb5 --enablewinbind --enablewinbindauth > --enablemkhomedir --update > > My sftp access did not work. Does it change the way to pass the login ? > I used

Thanks to your help Steffen I was able to find out the issue which was simply the size of the Spam mail as you can see here: spamc[16545]: skipped message, greater than max message size (512000 bytes) The spam mail was around 900 kbytes as such I have changed the spamc limit to 1MB. Bastard spammer who abuses this limit by attaching a big image... Regards ML On Thursday, January 15, 2015

I asked the moderators about it. This is the reply "Other moderators have looked into this a bit and may be able to shed more light on it. This is a "new" tactic where the spammers appear to reply to the r-help post. They are not, however, going through the r-help server. It also seems that this does not happen to everyone. I am not sure how you can automatically block the

Hi, Some people have suggested maintaining black lists and white lists to avoid spammers and allow legitimate callers into the network. However, the problem with this method is that the spammer's IP address might change due to DHCP. Today a spammer might get aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd and lets say that I put this address in my blacklist. To my annoyance, tomorrow a legitimate caller might get

I got some spam emails after my last post to the list, and the emails did not seem to go through r-help. The spammers may be subscribed to the r-help, or they get the poster emails from some of the web copies of this list (nabble or similar). Peter On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Ulrik Stervbo <ulrik.stervbo at gmail.com> wrote: > I asked the moderators about it. This is the reply

This way is so easier... Thank you Rowland Le 20/06/2019 ? 14:01, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 20/06/2019 17:54, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: >> My idea is to replace default "cifs_idmap_sss.so" plugin by >> "idmapwb.so" winbind plugin, in order to SSSD becomes a client of >> winbind. >> To avoid to change nsswitch.conf : >>

Hi I am setting up a Calling card Plat form I have incoming toll number, the provider charges incoming calls I see some spammers( competetors) keep calling my toll. so iam getting huge invoices how can i identify those kind of spammers and block the callerID for some time any suggestions or example could help me ram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info: # your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds] # the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page] # the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page] I'll branch out from here. Maybe. While I understand the problem with spammers, asking each user to send each proposed page to the list for

Hi! This happened to me also! I just got a spam email just after posting and then in following days I got obnoxious spam emails in my spam filter. As the others, I think that there is some kind of bot subscribed to the list, but also perhaps a spider or crawler monitoring the R-Help archive and getting email addresses there. Nabble is a possibility too. > On 17 Apr 2018, at 21:50, Peter

No, I do not use gmail, still got dirty spam email twice. -----Original Message----- From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Fowler, Mark Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 12:32 PM To: Luis Puerto; Peter Langfelder Cc: R-Help ML R-Project; Neotropical bat risk assessments Subject: Re: [R] Hacked [Attention: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments

Just an observation. I have not seen the spam you are discussing. Possibly it is specific to gmail addresses? -----Original Message----- From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Luis Puerto Sent: April 17, 2018 4:11 PM To: Peter Langfelder Cc: R-Help ML R-Project; Neotropical bat risk assessments Subject: Re: [R] Hacked Hi! This happened to me also! I just got a spam

Hello, Nor do I, no gmail, also got spam. Rui Barradas On 4/17/2018 8:34 PM, Ding, Yuan Chun wrote: > No, I do not use gmail, still got dirty spam email twice. > > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Fowler, Mark > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 12:32 PM > To: Luis Puerto; Peter Langfelder > Cc: R-Help ML

The problem is not specific to this list. Any kind of public list may mean that other subscribers (or even the whole world) can see your email address. So whenever you mail to a (public) list there is a good chance that afterwards, you will get more spam. Not really much can be done about it, at least not on the side of the list, since any of the subscribers may be a spammer, who can know... All

Likely a spammer has joined the mailing list and is auto-replying to posts made to the list. Unlikely that the list itself has been "hacked". Agree that it is obnoxious. On April 17, 2018 5:01:10 AM PDT, Neotropical bat risk assessments <neotropical.bats at gmail.com> wrote: >Hi all, > >Site has been hacked? >Bad SPAM arriving >

On 06/17/2018 09:11 AM, Alice Wonder via CentOS wrote: > On 06/17/2018 08:52 AM, Michael Hennebry via CentOS wrote: >> I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> >>>> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >>>> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> >>>> So, if your mail hosting provider

Hi All: I lately get a lot more spam-porn type emails lately also but I don't know if they are due to me being on the R-list. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hello, > > Nor do I, no gmail, also got spam. > > Rui Barradas > > On 4/17/2018 8:34 PM, Ding, Yuan Chun wrote: > >> No, I do not use gmail, still