similar to: CESA-2012:1102 Moderate CentOS 6 pidgin Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1821 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1821.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 42b8825789b4d515eac5e205780cb41668a3b4b8087b50dca89127659046459f finch-2.7.9-3.el6.2.i686.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I use "virsh pool-define rbd.xml" to create a rbd storage pool,but get this error virsh pool-define /tmp/rbd.xml error: Failed to define pool from /tmp/rbd.xml error: internal error: missing backend for pool type 8 rbd.xml <pool type="rbd"> <name>cloudstack</name> <source> <name>cloudstack</name> <host

As much as I hate to be the bearer of news, I saw over 400 updates this morning on my upstream 6.1 box.... checking the upstream website, yeah, EL6.2 is out, at least for updates. I didn't see ISO's in my subscribed channel yet, though. I figured someone would notice soon enough. So before anyone goes into flame mode, think about the difficulties that have faced the CentOS developers in

we recently deployed some large XFS file systems with centos 6.2 used as NFS servers... I've had some reports of a problem similar to the one reported here... http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/red-hat-31/xfs-inode64-nfs-export-no_subtree_check-and-stale-nfs-file-handle-message-855844/ these reports are somewhat vague (third indirectly reported via internal corporate channels from

Update me Richie, Meanwhile, I've booted the server in latest kernel, Its still not working for me. 2015-03-17 0:54 GMT+05:30 Thirumalai Nambi <thirumalai.sandy@gmail.com>: > > libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64 > upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64 > atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch > plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64

I have a large raid (lsi megaraid sas2 9261-8i card) and when I use parted to initialize it as the one big partition I want, it gives me a warning. # parted /dev/sda "mklabel gpt" Warning: The existing disk label on /dev/sda will be destroyed and all data on this disk will be lost. Do you want to continue? Yes/No? yes # parted -a optimal /dev/sda

For those who don't follow the QA RSS, see: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/120 to get the latest info on the status of 6.2. Looks good so far!

Seems to only write the first block, or with some clients only a zero length file. Perms are obviously not an issue if at least one block can be written? Anyone know what might give? Thanks, jlc

Hi all, I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to use in my procmail config. One particular rule would be this: :0 Wfh * ^Sender: owner-scientific-linux-devel at LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV | (sed -e '/^Subject:/ s/\[SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL\] *//g'| sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/Precedence:

libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64 upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64 atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64 patchutils-0.3.1-3.1.el6.x86_64 bc-1.06.95-1.el6.x86_64 cscope-15.6-6.el6.x86_64 coreutils-8.4-37.el6.x86_64 ncurses-devel-5.7-3.20090208.el6.x86_64 libselinux-utils-2.0.94-5.8.el6.x86_64

Hi All, I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I tried doing the "minimal" installation available with the installer, but it's a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal starting place. I'm pretty familiar with 5.x, but what I'm finding in 6.2 is a lot of new stuff, and a lot of odd behavior. For example,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0139 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0139.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 54cd22cf339e22a28301695c9be011921cc5541ccb77264214b7998297cf2b0d finch-2.7.9-27.el6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0646 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0646.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c652795fb86cece54b9927a3daa6710a486b3b142f4fbe76dff568c31fa858e2 finch-2.7.9-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102 Bug ID: 1102 Summary: The manual pages missing files Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon Assignee: netfilter-buglog at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1002 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Attachment #1147| |ok? Flag|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #15 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-09-28 19:25 ------- With the release of 4.4, we believe that this bug is