similar to: FETCH Error

Hi, i want to use unix groups in my ACLs. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/ACL says, I can do that with a post-login script (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting). I have verified, that the script is running, and that ACL_GROUPS is correct. But I still can't access the Mailbox. Logfile says: Dec 3 11:19:35 mailint1 dovecot: imap(micha): Debug: acl vfile: reading file

Hi, using LMTP, is it possible to disable the addition of the Delivered-To header to messages? Micha Krause

Hi again, First, i revert to a snapashot with samba 4.7.7 and upgraded it to 4.7.8. I got no issue with my settings and "testparm" outputs as expected. Next i tried again upgrade to samba 4.8.3. But i got the same error like an email before. Yes i guess its a problem that "tesparm" cant read the registry. When im removing "include = registry" and add my global

Just to be sure: Your real realm does not end with .local, right? In an another thread it was not recommended to use TLD .local. The wiki says this also. Am 2. Februar 2015 12:25:46 MEZ, schrieb "Micha? P??rolniczak" <michal.polrolniczak at warp.org.pl>: >the smb.conf for samba 4.1.6-Ubuntu >[global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL >

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Micha? P??rolniczak < michal.polrolniczak at warp.org.pl> wrote: > > > W dniu 2015-01-27 o 18:42, Marc Muehlfeld pisze: > >> Hello Micha?, >> >> Am 27.01.2015 um 07:08 schrieb Micha? P??rolniczak: >> >>> When changing password via Windows Logon it doesn't say it change it, it >>> say that new password

now, im on a phone and no browser, so limit help. first thing i see.   CN=Bj”rn <User>,CN=Users,DC=rootrudi,DC=de Bj”rn ?  is your system set to utf8? i dont know, but this does not look right. i see, wifi? yes, try utp. langsame Verbindung:500 kbps and do try the ignore systemacl.  that solves the user/group “nt authority\system” problems the easy way. greetz Louis Op 6 feb. 2018

Hello Marc, W dniu 2015-01-22 o 20:17, Marc Muehlfeld pisze: > Hello Micha?, > > Am 22.01.2015 um 07:13 schrieb Micha? P??rolniczak: >> When GPO tells you to change password after 30days, or you want to >> change it; ... > > At first: You can't define password policies via GPO, because they have > to be interpreted by the domain controller(s) and Samba

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > Almost all drivers using remove_conflicting_framebuffers() wrap it with > the same code. Extract common part from PCI drivers into separate > remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(). > > Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> Since the only driver that seems to use this is the staging one,

W dniu 2015-01-27 o 18:42, Marc Muehlfeld pisze: > Hello Micha?, > > Am 27.01.2015 um 07:08 schrieb Micha? P??rolniczak: >> When changing password via Windows Logon it doesn't say it change it, it >> say that new password that I entered is not valid with password politic >> settings, and wasn't change. > Does it met the requirements? >

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > > > Almost all drivers using remove_conflicting_framebuffers() wrap it with > > > the same code. Extract common part from PCI drivers into separate > > >

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > Almost all drivers using remove_conflicting_framebuffers() wrap it with > the same code. Extract common part from PCI drivers into separate > remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(). > > Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> Since the only driver that seems to use this is the staging one,

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > > > Almost all drivers using remove_conflicting_framebuffers() wrap it with > > > the same code. Extract common part from PCI drivers into separate > > >

I found out, when im creating a complete new share, access via computer management - per default there is a share permission set with full controll to "everyone". When im trying now to set ACLs it is working. But when im deleting "everyone" and set Domain Admins and/or Unix Admins and give them full controll, im no more able to set ACLs! Micha Am 28. Januar 2018 12:00:07

I tried this. When im creating a folder directly on server, the sticky bit is working. But it does not work when im doing it from windows. # ls -l drwxrws---+ 7 root stickygroup 4096 Mär 5 14:44 00_stickygroup/ Best regards Micha Am 05.03.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Michael Wandel: > IMHO you can use the posix sgid bit.

Hello. I have made a ogv file for testing html5 video using ffmpeg2theora for Windows. It is available on http://wwsi.edu.pl/video/enigma.html and http://movies.wwsi.edu.pl/wwsi/small/enigma.ogv . It looks it works fine in Firefox, Opera for Windows, VLC, mplayer, ffmpegplay, some other Linux browsers. It fails in Chrome (and Chromium), the video looks very out of synchronization. I

Hello, from SAMBA 4.9/4.10 there was a big change regarding CTDB. Does anyone have an example configuration, how to configure a CTDB cluster from version 4.10? Is there someone who run CTDB with SAMBA 4.10? Best regards Micha

Hi, i upgraded my domain controller (dc1 and dc2, Ubuntu 18.04, compiled version of samba). It was a in-place upgrade from samba 4.11.7 to 4.12.3 Now I get the following error: # samba-tool drs showrepl ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/ldb/local_password.so : /usr/local/samba/lib/private/libsamdb-common-samba4.so: version `SAMBA_4.11.7' not found (required by

Can''t figure this one out: I''ve been running shorewall 1.4.10 for many months now on a Fedora Core 1 machine. Just finished setting up a new machine (Fedora Core 2) with shorewall 2.0.9. In the new installation, I editted the shorewall config files, copying over my rules, masq entries, policies, etc to each new file. Shorewall startup goes thru fine. Today I switched between

On 17.02.2015 20:03, Micha? Gi?y?ski wrote: > > On 21.11.2014 20:04, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I noticed that in some circumstances quota warnings are ignored. The >> bug arises when both of the following are used: >> >> 1. percentage-based quota warnings, i.e.: >> >> quota_warning = storage=1%% quota-warning 1 %u >>

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > > > > > Almost all