similar to: Selective TLS per local IP

On 1/1/2015 4:17 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Robert Blayzor <rblayzor.bulk at inoc.net> wrote: >>> Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times of >>> the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat >>> unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would explain your problem. >>>

Samba organizers might want to look into this: [ns1:~] dig 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28005 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION:

I have a rather busy Apache 2.2 server; tons of small & some large requests. It's a standard Dell 2650 server using the bge (broadcom) network driver. I seem to have a rather strange problem where after just a day or so Apache just stops processing new connections. You can connect to port 80, but trying to get Apache to process any data just hangs. There is nothing strange in

Per RFC 8501 seciont 2.2 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8501 I have attempted to use a wildcard on a /64 boundary within a zonefile for NSD, but it doesn't not appear to work. PTR lookups fail... tested with, ie: $ORIGIN 1.1.0.0.8.5.1.b.2.2.5.2.ip6.arpa. * PTR my.fqdn.net. Did not work... or would you have to use? (not tested) *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* PTR .... --

I have configured autoexpunge on some folders: namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Junk { auto = subscribe autoexpunge = 30 days special_use = \Junk } mailbox Trash { auto = subscribe autoexpunge = 2 weeks special_use = \Trash } prefix = separator = / } After adding these and restarting, logging in and out several times, I still see messages

In reading the Dovecot NFS WIKI entry: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS It mentions a FreeBSD NFS client caching bug. I believe that bug only exists pre-8.x ? It seems that a patch in the PR notes was MFC'd and made it into 8.x at some point. (at least I checked the source in 8.3 and it was there). So I assume that FreeBSD 8.x mitigates the issue? Maybe not? So our deployment is multi

On Dec 22, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Teemu Huovila <teemu.huovila at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > The autoexpunge feature does not check the \Deleted flag. > > Are any errors logged in "doveadm log errors"? Could you post your complete output of doveconf -n please. That?s what I thought. If I run expunge from doveadm manually, it will work as expected. I just never seem to get

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Dominik Breu <dominik at dominikbreu.de> wrote: > the autoexpunge feature only removes mails wich have the \Delete Flag so no deletion of mails wich doesn't have this Flag(see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4315#section-2.1 or http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Expunge) > > you could run a cron job with a doveadm move comando to move the

> On August 5, 2016 at 6:47 PM "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters at domblogger.net> wrote: > > > On 08/05/2016 08:41 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > > Is there a way to configure Dovecot to perhaps filter/enforce which passwords are accepted before authenticating? > > > > Ie: Reject immediately (without a database lookup) if password is not X characters in

Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each message. (If I understand the current documentation) Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary MTA to reject the delivery rather than generating more back scatter NDRs. Anyone know if this is possible now (to forgo the NDR)'s or do we need to wait for ereject ? If so, how much work

Does (or can) the ability to use expansion variables in Dovecot's log_path exist? ie: log_path = /var/log/dovecot/dovecot-%Y%m%d -- Robert Blayzor INOC, LLC rblayzor at inoc.net http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/

On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD > > why do you want the burden of keep the SMTP session with the client open until the mail is

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > and what would that change? > nothing if you think about how mail works! > > * the MTA receives the message > * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code > * later the delivery server rejects > * the MTA *must* create a bounce > > just don't reject mails after you confirmed you

I have searching for the best way to tell if a Dovecot user is idle by finding the last time they have logged in. Right now the best way I can tell is to do something like "touch" a file in the users homedir via a post login exec. This seems like a LOT of overhead, to accomplish such a simple task, especially if your doing a lot of dozens of logins per second. Is there an

On 3/20/23 13:41, Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users wrote: > Hi Robert, > > NSD doesn't understand the GENERATE directive. You'll have to create > your zone files using a script or template engine. Understood but certainly not helpful with large dynamic IPv6 PTR's... Not that dynamic hosts NEED PTR's, but would still be nice to have. -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP:

A bit off topic, but I was wondering if anyone here has a solution for centrally managing sieve for multiple users from a custom web application? We would like to implement pigeonhole sieve on our dovecot cluster, however we need to be able to access user?s sieve configurations from a central location for troubleshooting and support purposes.

I recently installed Samba 2.2.5 from the FreeBSD ports. It seems Samba works fine when browsing the Samba server from WinXP client, etc. I can copy files from the Samba server, and even create small files and copy small files TO the Samba server. The problem seems to be if I try to copy any file greater than 16Kbytes or so to the Samba server. When I do so, Windows XP complains with an error:

On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > > Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times of > the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat > unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would explain your problem. > > To confirm, could you try running sievec again, so that the .svbin is

Is there a way to configure Dovecot to perhaps filter/enforce which passwords are accepted before authenticating? Ie: Reject immediately (without a database lookup) if password is not X characters in length? ? -- Robert inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP Key: 78BEDCE1 @ pgp.mit.edu

This may be more of a CPanel issue than Dovecot but CPanel uses Dovecot and not sure if this is a knob we have available in Dovecot or we need to reach out to Cpanel directly to see if this is some custom code they added to their distros. Anyway, W/R/T emails sent with dtails/ + addresses ie: foo+bar at mydomain.com And with LDA/LMTP, in Cpanel by default the detials part, in this case