similar to: ifconfig(8) fails to set MTU on multiple interfaces.

Could a clueful list admin take this d00f off the list... robertot@redix.it ----- Forwarded message from robertot@redix.it ----- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:34:56 +0200 (CEST) From: robertot@redix.it To: jhellenthal@dataix.net Subject: Please confirm your message This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA). Your message attached below is being held because the

When using svn 1.8 I have come across a situation where when it is used pointing to a symlink that refers to a working directory that a update will either segfault or exit prematurely and leave a lock held on the working directory that the symlink points to. This leaves you with one choice but to run cleanup on the referenced actual working directory which was AFAIK never the case for any version

Hi: I could not figure out how to restrict users or other users from certain privileges to execute certain commands in FreeBSD/NanoBSD? What I meant is I want to create a NanoBSD image in which there will be an additional user, say 'admin'. I need to give this new user (admin) some privileges to run some root-can-only-execute commands, but not all (ACL similar to the firmwares in adsl

FYI I verified this on a working system. ----- Forwarded message from 0x721427D8 0x721427D8 <0x721427d8@gmail.com> ----- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:02:43 +0200 From: 0x721427D8 0x721427D8 <0x721427d8@gmail.com> To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Subject: [php<=5.4.3] Parsing Bug in PHP PDO prepared statements may lead to access violation [php<=5.4.3] Parsing Bug in PHP PDO

I read this (http://www.petur.eu/blog/?p=459) blog post today. It's about that a remote user with root privilegs to a FreeBSD jail & user privileges to the jails host machine can obtain root privileges on the host machine. Can someone confirm if this bugg/exploit works?

Dear ALL! Maybe someone can help me with my problem? I have no adea what is happening with my packets :( I have 5.4-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 box running pf. And i have ipcad daemon running (installed from ports) pf.conf says pass quick on lo0 all and when i'm trying to rsh to ipcad that is listening on anna# netstat -a|grep shell tcp4 0 0 localhost.shell *.*

Every time I send a message to this list, I get a bounced email reply from some Russian exchange server for email address xlino@bvpress.ru. Is there an admin or a moderator for this list that can remove that email address from the list? Rob

Hi all, I am using Xen 2.0.7. I have Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 02) cards which support frames greater than 1500. However when I boot into Xen and try to set the MTU to anything higher than 1500 (e.g., 4000, 8000 etc) I get a segmentation fault. After this fault, every command fails with a segmentation fault. I saw a similar bug report posted here:

Hi Everyone, I have pfSense running which supplies Asterisk with DHCP. I had some testing ports opened for a web server which I have totally closed now but when I chose option 10 (filter log) on pfSense I get all of this type of traffic (note that it was only 1 single IP and once I blocked that one it was like opening a can full of bees with all different IPs): tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no

On a rather full customer web server, I am trying to track down whose web site script is trying to make outbound network connections when they should not be. In /etc/security/audit_control, I added to the flags line dir:/var/audit flags:lo,aa,-nt minfree:5 to log failed network connection. When I try an make an outbound connection to something that is blocked in pf, it seems to sometimes work.

I'm upgrading the desktops on my LAN from Windows XP to Windows 7 (x64 Ultimate, if that matters). The samba version is 3.5.6 on FreeBSD 8.1 amd64. I can successfully map the samba shares on both XP and 7, but while XP shows the expected description which includes the server string (for ex- ample, "data on 'RAIDzilla II (rz2)' (Y:)", 7 shows only "data (\\rz2)

greetings list. am serving SMB using the samba-3.0.24 package on an openbsd 4.1-release machine and am seeing really low throughput from the server, even when both the server and client are on gigabit ethernet. the maximum throughput i've been able to attain is ~6 MBps, which is pretty slow, both on 100 Mbps and 1 Gbps segments. this top speed is identical on both 100 Mbps and 1 Gbps.

Hello, I have a server pfsense in bridge mode to function as transparent FW, the problem is that once I connect the pfsense between my router core and my core switch catalyst a few seconds begin to appear several messages like these: em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting And the connection falls

Couple of little things I noticed with a new RELENG_7 AMD64 box (as of yesterday) ifstat from the ports cannot seem to find interfaces for some reason ? It works fine on i386 [ns8]# ifstat -b ifstat: no interfaces to monitor! [ns8]# [ns8]# ifconfig em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500

HI Folks, I've got two boxes that I recently moved from -stable to 9.1rc1. I did them one at a time, with about a week between the upgrades. After the first upgrade, I noticed something strange with networking but didn't really dig into it much. After the second upgrade immediately experiencing the same issues, I figured it seemed to be something related to 9.1rc1. What I am finding

Samba 4.10.8 - > 4.11.2 (latest update) FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3 Dell PowerEdge R730xd with 256GB RAM and some 140TB disk ZFS filesystems smb.conf: [global] private directory = /liu/etc/samba/private lock directory = /liu/var/samba/locks cache directory = /liu/var/samba/cache state directory = /liu/var/samba/state ncalrpc dir = /liu/var/samba/ncalrpc ;; Network interfaces bind

We have a setup with a bunch of Dell servers acting as fileserver for the university here, running FreeBSD with Samba (and NFS & SFTP) to provide service for staff & students. This works in general really (very) well. We have around 4000-5000 SMB connections spread over 6 servers during “rush hours” (8am-5pm). However, due to some strange (I bet it’s due to the service ticket timeout)

Hi, I have a FreeBSD 4.8 box connected to the net which until recently hasn't had any problems. Today DNS lookups mysteriously stopped working (the box has tinydns & dnscache installed to handle dns requests). I noticed some strange things while checking the problem with tcpdump. Tcpdump appears not to show any traffic whatsoever on either my external interface or internal lan interface,

I''m new to openvpn and maybe I should be asking on openvpn''s list... But I read the tutorial: http://www.shorewall.net/OPENVPN.html#id2452626 and saw the following: " On System A: ifconfig 192.168.99.1 192.168.99.2 " I don''t understand the reason for using these "virual" IPs. For instance, I configured openvpn on my peers so that the IPs on the

Hi, Just thought I'd mention that I spent a while battling with tinc today. I had quite a weird behaviour - in routing mode, tinc would come up fine on both hosts, but pinging hosta from hostb wouldn't work until hosta pinged hostb. I've used an earlier version of tinc before in a different environment with no problems, and vaguely remembered a more complicated tinc-up script, so I