similar to: Issues with Plus addressing and detail part of subaddress.

On 22 Oct 2020, at 10:05, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: > require ["variables", "copy"]; > > if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] { > redirect :copy "backup+295.${1}.${2}@*example.com*"; > } I have tried this with similar results: require ["copy", "variables",

> On Oct 22, 2020, at 15:58, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: > > On 22 Oct 2020, at 15:46, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> And it doesn't explain why "if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] {" also failed to match despite also showing the email address. >> >>> ?kremels at kreme.com? does not

I use recipient_delimiter addresseses quiet a bit, and I want to put several of them into a mailbox if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ ?FOO", ?foo", ?bar", ?florin"]) { fileinto :create ?later"; stop; } When I get an email addressed to me+FOO at example.com or me_florin at example.com, the messages end up in my inbox (Yes, I have both + and _

Hello, I'm trying to get more info about user activity (especially when they delete some email). So, I follow info from http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailLog to enabled mail logger plugin, but I don't see anything in my logs. Can you tell me what I'm missing ? Thanks. # doveconf -n # 2.2.10.3: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.4 ext4

We're using sieve with LMTP. We want to have lda_mailbox_autocreate and lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox. Is there a way to make the "detail" case-insensitive? If so I have not found it yet. I suppose we could lowercase the input string for the SQL userdb query, but that's not what is wanted. The idea being that if a user makes a mailbox called "Test" is that user+test

Hi, I am interested in applying to LLVM as part Google Summer of Code 2015. I have been going through LLVM code since about 4 months now, and while going though mailing list discussions I found particular interest in the point raised by Arch Robinson in January about the development of a floating point range check pass in LLVM. I have been in touch with Arch as well as Hal Finkel about this and

Op 1/3/2018 om 8:49 PM schreef Larry Rosenman: > I'm trying to set an IMAP Flag with the detail part of an address, but getting > an internal error: > > an 3 13:37:27 thebighonker exim[537]: 1eWoqt-00008f-4u <= ler at lerctr.org H=(lrosenman.local) [74.203.163.58]:4650 I=[192.147.25.65]:587 P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA3 > 84:256 CV=no

Hi experts, I picked up a copy of the rspec book and wrote some tests in spec/lib and spec/models for my Rails 2.3.8 code. I was using rspec 2.5.1, rspec-core 2.5.0, rspec-expectations 2.5.0 et. al. But I realised that the rspec-rails version I am using is meant for Rails3. Which version of rspec-rails should I use for Rails 2.3.8? Best, Radhesh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

We have the following namespace: namespace { inbox = yes list = yes location = prefix = INBOX/ separator = / subscriptions = yes type = private } namespace { list = children location = maildir:%%h:INDEX=%h/shared/%%u:CONTROL=%h/shared/%%u prefix = shared/%%u/ separator = / subscriptions = yes type = shared } and we set: lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes

Hi, I am working on some changes to LazyValueInfo and I wanted to see how it was used in existing passes. Currently I can see that Jump Threading and Correlated Value Propagation are the 2 passes that use LazyValueInfo. However on the LLVM docs page of passes (http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html <http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html>), Correlated Value Propagation is not mentioned as a pass. Does

Hello Andrew & Louis, Yesterday by around 1:30 PM we had the same issue. Samba AD kicked all of us out and RSAT did not connect to any domain controllers. /*Incidentally the RSAT that caused this error was running on Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit edition.*/ When I restarted the samba-ad-dc service, all started working well again. However, as mentioned again, I could not trace the error

Hi I have "problem" with dovect 2.2.13 from repo debian8 and I don't know how to solve it ... Server is a virtual (kvm) with debian 8.11 (postfix + dovecot from repo) and storage is mounting via nfs (I have use only one dovecot with external storage) All works fine but sometime ( after a few hours ) I have got a problem with dovecot cache (i use indexes) logs ->

Hi Thanx for replay. Log: http://paste.debian.net/1117077/ On 20.11.2019 10:07, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Firstly, 2.2.13 is about 5 years old. So there's that. It would be > helpful if you can reproduce this with 2.2.36. > > Also, you forgot to actually include in your log snippet the panic. So > maybe few more lines before the Raw backtrace? > > Aki > > On 20.11.2019

Steffen Kaiser: > Is the detail delived to Dovecot by the MTA at all? sure! have to say: I faked that example. In reality I tested the inverse way: My lab setup actually *do* deliver to folders and I saw, setting lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox to 'no' still deliver to folder while INBOX was expected. so, correct hint: I should really try on an other system ... But from my debug logs it

I'm trying to set an IMAP Flag with the detail part of an address, but getting an internal error: an 3 13:37:27 thebighonker exim[537]: 1eWoqt-00008f-4u <= ler at lerctr.org H=(lrosenman.local) [74.203.163.58]:4650 I=[192.147.25.65]:587 P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA3 84:256 CV=no SNI="smtp.lerctr.org" A=dovecot_login:ler S=769 id=20180103193716.oofszdaxopnkgfvd at

Hi, I have a dovecot 2.3.2.1 instance running here that is getting userdb and passdb data from a SQL database. This was a cyrus server migrated over and all users are happy. All users except one: Said user asked if it would be possible to disable subaddressing (localuser+folder at example.com) again. The setting controlling that is AFAIK the lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox item. My idea was to

Hello, My dovecot server (2.2.33.2) work with "lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = no" Now I would like to enable the feature for /some/ users. Is that an option that could be set from an LDAP entry? I tried the following: modify my ldap schema to allow an optional attribute "lmtp-save-to-detail-mailbox" in /etc/dovecot/ldap.conf user_attrs = ...

I''m trying to create a ssh class where the /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts and /etc/ssh/shosts.equiv stays updated. The issue i''m finding is that if I include a "tag == anything" in the Collector filter, it collects all resources EXCEPT it''s own. In this case, the known_hosts and .equiv files will have all the other hostnames, but not it''s own hostname.

On July 1, Alan Schmitt wrote: >>>> What OS are you using in server side? And what filesystem? >>> >>> Mac OS X.4.7, with HFS+ as files system. >> >> I think I've heard before that Dovecot doesn't behave too great with >> OSX.. > >This might be the cause. I've had the plan to move my IMAP server to >a linux box, this might be

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Sean Kamath wrote: > From: Sean Kamath <kamath at moltingpenguin.com> > On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Alexandre Ellert <aellert at numeezy.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to get more info about user activity (especially when they delete some email). >> So, I follow info from