similar to: centos 5.5 yum updates

H, I am using libvirt from maven using a nexus proxy pointing to http://www.libvirt.org/maven2/ It downloads the jar fine but is expecting libvirt-0.5.1.pom (and ...sha1). In the proxy only the jar appears. When I download and rename the pom to my local .m2 cache my build works fine. Is this a bug in the distribution of libvirt in its maven repo or is my dependency wrong somehow? Kind regards,

LS, I am sure you have already noticed but I want to report it anyway; When compiling a dependend on "https://libvirt.org/maven2/net/juniper/tungsten/juniper-tungsten-api/2.0/juniper-tungsten-api-2.0.pom", I get a certificate error. I get the a similar error when accessing https://libvirt.org btw hope you can do something with this information, -- Daan

Hey everyone, I'm trying to compile a document to send out to our customers that outlines the minimum and recommended requirements to run C4, C5, and C6. Does anyone know the particulars? When we order systems, it's usually Pentium Dual Core CPU, 120GB+ Hard drive, 2GB Ram. I need the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM requirements to install and run any of the aforementioned flavors as a

Just wondering if anyone might be seeing any similar frequent crashes of Firefox/GNOME/Nautilus lately. I have a couple of users who have reported a problem like this. Any ideas are welcome. Latest CentOS 5.5 w/patches, latest nVidia graphics driver, firefox from repos. | ###!!! ABORT: Request 0.0: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such | operation): file nsX11ErrorHandler.cpp, line 182 |

What's the deal with all of the new dependencies for xulrunner-devel in the last update? I'm updating my servers and the update for xulrunner-devel is forcing me to install 43 new packages! Is this a packaging problem, or are all of those packages really needed? For the moment, I've been removing xulrunner-devel from my machines to avoid the problem. I figure since it is a

Hi All, Am getting this: ---> Package xulrunner.i686 0:1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libmozjs.so for package: gxine-0.5.905-1.el6.rf.i686 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: gxine-0.5.905-1.el6.rf.i686 (@rpmforge) Requires: libmozjs.so Removing: xulrunner-1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos.i686 (@updates)

After my / disk seemed to be failing and found many files disappeared, I decided to remove it. I moved my other disk to it's place. Long story omitted. After installing my backup of /home and seeing firefox not restart, I started it from the command line with the immediate error: Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.0.5 and 1.9.0.5. I'm sorry, I'm at a complete loss.

I once had firefox x86_64 installed (because it was the default). But that one has problems with plugins (flash, java), which are much easily solved by using the i386 version. So I unstalled firefox, and installed it again using: yum install firefox.i386 This worked, and even the plugins worked fine afterwards. I did have some problems when uninstalling, because yum insisted on a whole load

Hi, I've just installed xulrunner-devel from yum, but there are following header files cannot be found in xulrunner-sdk-1.9/sdk/include: mozilla-config.h mozilla-config32.h prtypes.h The include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9 constains those above header files, I did link to them, but xulrunner-sdk-1.9/system_wrappers/prtypes.h has a problem as well: #pragma GCC system_header #pragma GCC visibility

In doing an update of centos 5.2 this morning, I observed that the old gecko-libs dependency issue caused yum update to fail because it was required by nspluginwrapper (x64_86), devhelp, yelm and firefox. Also, a firefox (x64_86) showed the red hat splash screen rather than centos. Manual installation of affected rpms using --nodeps (I don't advise this) did not apear to impair the

Is there a way of installing xulrunner-1.9 along side xulrunner-10.0? I have an application that wants the older version of xulrunner and does not seem to work with xulrunner-10.0. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / heller at deepsoft.com Deepwoods Software -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against

According to 'yum info xulrunner' version 1.9.0.19, release 1.el5_5 exists and is an available package. But when I try to update it, yum claims there is nothing to do and when I try a general update, yum complains that it cannot update firefox because it cannot find xulrunner >= 1.9.0.19-1. What is going on here? I am doing this on a desktop x86_64 system that I recently brought up

Redhat offers a desktop virtualization solution using "kvm,qemu,libvirt and spice" which is directed at centralized server hosting virtual desktops and thin clients connecting to it. All the relevant software are open source. So it should be possible to achieve the same feat with CentOS. Anyone know any complete tutorial regarding this? I've found separate tutorials regarding

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0112 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0112.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: af85d2bab4fd84678522fa921ad7c65d firefox-3.0.18-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm 17a22cb02ee8ac264f6f5f169266443f xulrunner-1.9.0.18-1.el5_4.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0112 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0112.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: af85d2bab4fd84678522fa921ad7c65d firefox-3.0.18-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm 17a22cb02ee8ac264f6f5f169266443f xulrunner-1.9.0.18-1.el5_4.i386.rpm

Found this <http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux-amd64.html#java-sun>, and I remember the plugins directory... except firefox 3.6.11, I can't find any, not in ~/.mozilla, not in /usr/lib64/mozilla. Anyone have a clue for the poor? mark

Hi All, I just discovered that the remi repo has updated versions of firefox. This is good news, but it leads me to a question. Is it possible to exclude all packages except one or two in a repo file? The man page for yum.conf didn't give me any hints. I tried unsuccessfully adding this line: exclude=!firefox*,!xulrunner* Is there a way to set up this repo so that when I run "yum

I have re-packaged xulrunner 1.9.2.26 for CentOS 5 for use with older applications which can't be run with xulrunner 10.0.4. I created 'compatibity' RPMs that can be safely installed alongside xulrunner 10.0.4. I needed it to run the Evergreen 2.1 and 2.2 Staff Clients at our local library. The RPMs are available in the Deepwoods Software repo at the URL:

How to solve this issue? [root at king rescue]# yum update xulrunner Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.silyus.net * updates: mirror.silyus.net * addons: mirror.silyus.net * extras: mirror.silyus.net Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:1.9.0.2-5.el5

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When