similar to: Bug#641098: VM does not launch

Hello, I am trying to perform a two-factor ANOVA analysis using a blocking design with "Vol" as the response variable. My intent is to have "Rater" treated as the treatment variable and the "Pipe" treated as the blocking variable. I am reading and preparing my dataset using the following three lines of code: values <- read.table("filename",

Dear R-ers, I am having trouble understanding why I am getting an error using glmmPQL (library MASS). I am getting the following error: iteration 1 Error in MEEM(object, conLin, control$niterEM) : Singularity in backsolve at level 0, block 1 The long story: I have data from an experiment on pairwise comparisons between 3 treatments (a, b, c). So a typical run of an experiment

Hi All, Is there an easy way to reduce a data.frame to 1 'id' per row while keeping information from the other rows of that same variable, if applicable? e.g.: # data multi[1:15,] id r n wi wi.tau z k alliance a.rater eml treatment outcome o.rater german 1 100 0.2800000 44 41 21.72514 0.2876821 210 <NA> <NA> <NA> <NA>

Hi All. I need a bit of help extracting the residual error variance from the VarCorr structure from lmer. #Here's a 2-way random effects model lmer.1 <- lmer(rating ~ (1|person)+(1|rater), data = dat) #Get the structure vc.fit <- VarCorr(lmer.1) #results in..... $person 1 x 1 Matrix of class "dpoMatrix" (Intercept) (Intercept) 0.7755392 $rater 1 x 1 Matrix

Hi. I have data which i would want to assess the degree of agreement between two assays, e.g., to evaluate reproducibility or for inter-rater reliability. I have used the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It looks good ranginging between 0.90 to 0.998. Though this looks good. I am told the Concordance correlation coefficient will give a better picture of how reproducible the assay

Il 17/05/2014 18:54, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: > Il 03/05/2014 11:30, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: >>> On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 14:05 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> > Hi waldi, >>> > >>> > Are you planning to update the Xen package too 4.4 soon? Upstream >>> have >>> > released 4.4-rc6 and AIUI are planning to release the final

Il 17/05/2014 18:54, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: > Il 03/05/2014 11:30, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: >>> On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 14:05 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> > Hi waldi, >>> > >>> > Are you planning to update the Xen package too 4.4 soon? Upstream >>> have >>> > released 4.4-rc6 and AIUI are planning to release the final

Hi All, I am using fleiss kappa for inter rater agreement. Are there any know issues with Fleiss kappa calculation in R? Even when I supply mock data with total agreement among the raters I do not get a kappa value of 1. instead I am getting negative values. I am using the irr package version 0.70 Any help is much appreciated. Thanks and Regards M [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Thank you very much for your immediate attention! I've exported my wav files to raw files before encoding and the click is now gone. That sure beats discarding the last packet, which was the workaround "solution" I was going to implement... Best regards, David Resnick -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca] Sent: Thursday, July 07,

Is there a function that calculates the inter-rater agreement index (kappa) in R? Thanks ../Murli [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All: Could anyone point me to a package that can calculate stratified kappa? My design is like this, 4 raters, 30 types of diagnosis scores, 20 patients. Each rater will rate each patient for each type of diagnosis score. The rater's value is nominal. I know I can measure the agreement between raters for each type of diagnosis score, e.g., calculate out 30 kappa values. My problem is I

Hello list, Using the mainline 3.5-rc6 kernel and yesterday''s xen-unstable, I''m having trouble passing in some PCI devices. Everything else works smoothly. Attached are some of the relevant logs and configurations. I did notice from the qemu logs that all the problematic devices have "IRQ type = INTx" whereas those that are working have "IRQ type =

Il 18/05/2014 20:11, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: > Il 17/05/2014 18:54, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: >> Il 03/05/2014 11:30, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: >>>> On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 14:05 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>> > Hi waldi, >>>> > >>>> > Are you planning to update the Xen package too 4.4 soon? Upstream >>>> have

Il 18/05/2014 20:11, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: > Il 17/05/2014 18:54, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: >> Il 03/05/2014 11:30, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: >>>> On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 14:05 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>> > Hi waldi, >>>> > >>>> > Are you planning to update the Xen package too 4.4 soon? Upstream >>>> have

Fasiha Ashraf --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] my bootlog To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 11:12 AM Please check what wrong here grub.conf        title Fedora (2.6.30-rc6-tip)         root (hd0,6)         kernel

Hi, In the case of linux, crash_kexec() is occured by "sysrq c". In the case of DomainU on xen, Help is occured by "sysrq c" now. So The way of dumping DomainU''s memory manualy is nothing. I fix this issue by the following way. 1. Panic is occured by "sysrq c" on both Domain0 and DomainU. 2. On DomainU, coredump is generated in /var/xen/dump (on Domain0).

I just setup a new laptop with - Xen-unstable (http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.git), installed via "make xen", "make install-xen", "make tools", "make install-tools" - dom0 kernel 2.6.30-rc6-tip (from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git, changed to bleeding edge via "git checkout origin/xen-tip/next b xen tip/next

Can anybody, please, explain me how many parameter are estimated using randomLCA? For examples, model "dentistry.lca2random" estimate 1 scale (or variance, b_j) parameter and 2 position parameters (a_cj)? Doesn't it? Do I need at least 4 diagnostic tests for such a model? What happens if I specify options blocksize and byclass? How many diagnostic tests (or rater) I need?

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1~rc6-1 Severity: important Tags: patch The patch is not necessary for HVM DomU guests. The Error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind' was fixed by installing xen-qemu-dm-4.0. [1] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588888 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > close 587090 4.1.0~rc6-1 Bug #587090 [xen-utils-4.0] xen-utils-4.0: Exception starting xend ('NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind') There is no source info for the package 'xen-utils-4.0' at version '4.1.0~rc6-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version