similar to: [Patch] upssched broken in version 2.6.4 with command with two arguments

Hi again, On 5/22/23 18:31, Willcox David via Nut-upsuser wrote: > Hmm. Is there maybe something there already that will do this? Maybe > kind of back-handed. > > In drivers/dstate.c, I see: > > 1. In status_init(), if ?driver.flag.ignorelb? is set in the driver > state, the ?ignorelb? flag is set. > 2. In status_set(), if ignorelb is set, and the status being set

[Please remember to copy the list.] On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:45 AM, eric kreuwels wrote: > Hi Charles > > Thanks for your answer. Good questions/suggestions. I copied both the WinUPSC and the installer project on my GDRIVE and shared it with you: > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0mSjYYj84-6ZGM4MWZfMnFxbUU/edit?usp=sharing > > Archiving WinUPSC in the NUT GitHub would be my

Dear all, I use the Andersen plot to check for proportional hazards assumption for a factor (say x) in the Cox regression model and obtained a straight line that pass through the origin. However, the formal test done by the R-function cox.zph, which is based on the plot of Schonefeld residuals against time, indicates that proportional hazards assumption is violated. Further, a plot of the score

Hmm, looking at status_commit(), if the UPS actually reported just ?OB", but the ?ignorelb? logic kicked in, wouldn?t status_commit() change it to ?OB LB?? And would clients interpret that correctly? And, assuming status_commit() is called, is the status so saved what?s returned on a future client query? I?m really unsure how all of this works. I don?t suppose there?s some kind of ?general

[attachments trimmed] Begin forwarded message: > From: eric kreuwels > Subject: UPSC based Windows Client > Date: October 13, 2013 4:43:31 PM EDT > To: nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org > > > Dear developers > > Last month I wrote WinUPSC, a Windows task tray UPS monitor. WinUPSC re-uses the UPSC logic to poll the UPS. > This initial version was tested

Hmm. Is there maybe something there already that will do this? Maybe kind of back-handed. In drivers/dstate.c, I see: In status_init(), if ?driver.flag.ignorelb? is set in the driver state, the ?ignorelb? flag is set. In status_set(), if ignorelb is set, and the status being set (presumably from the UPS) is LB, it?s ignored. In other words, LB reported by the UPS is ignored. In status_commit(),

Moin, Es geht um das Dovecot-Buch. Ich nehme an, da? hier mindestens einer, der sich auskennt, mitliest: Gibt es - au?er der Sprache und dem Preis - einen Unterschied zwischen der ersten (und einzigen?) deutschen Auflage von 2014 und der englischen Auflage von 2016? -- Heiko -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:31:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > ext3-journalled-quotas-2.patch > ext3: journalled quota >... This patch broke modular quota: WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.4-mm1/kernel/fs/quota_v2.ko needs unknown symbol mark_info_dirty cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There

Hi all, I was just wondering if the following bugfix in 2.6.4 was a serious problem that could cause a problem in a destination file and if it did would that get picked up by the checksum ? Cheers - Steve - Fixed a potential protocol-corrupting bug where the generator could merge a message from the receiver into the middle of a multiplexed packet of data if only part of that

Markus Kemkes m?chte die Nachricht "[rsync-announce] Rsync 2.6.4 released" zur?ckrufen.

I have released rsync 2.6.4. This version has quite a few enhancements over 2.6.3, some optimizations in the delete handling, and the usual collection of bug fixes. I'd like to say "thanks" to everyone who downloaded and tested one of the pre-release versions -- the feedback was very helpful! A summary of the changes since 2.6.3 is available here:

I have released rsync 2.6.4. This version has quite a few enhancements over 2.6.3, some optimizations in the delete handling, and the usual collection of bug fixes. I'd like to say "thanks" to everyone who downloaded and tested one of the pre-release versions -- the feedback was very helpful! A summary of the changes since 2.6.3 is available here:

Hi, I'll be retaining a bit more 2.6.4, since I'm still missing some feedback and checks to maximize confidence... > The remainder on my side is: > - some completion on HP SNMP, > - merge branch-var-range > - merge LiebertPSP-2012-05-09.diff from Charles > - a massive update on blazer HCL, all this is done > - shut switch (mge-shut->mge-shut-old ;

Hi All, I'm new to Nut and had been looking for a way of monitoring a small UPS we have just designed. We are using simple contact closure circuit, but I don't appear to be able to get the Genericups driver to work. I've followed the documentation and have decided to try the APC upstype = 1 If I type 'genericups -x upstype=1 /dev/ttys0' , I get an error: 'Fatal error:

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040414/e4d94ced/attachment.bin

Hi, I got this error after a transaction was interrupted by me and a new (slightly updated) transaction was started. ... fedora/1/en/i386/base/pkglist.dag.bz2 1246954 100% 67.79kB/s 0:00:17 (27, 1.7% of 201557) Invalid file index 1777522462 (count=201557) rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at sender.c(152) On both ends exactly the same rsync was used. It's a

The delete-dir-and-suffix patch creates two new command line options as follows: --delete-dir --delete-suffix The delete-dir and delete-suffix options give the ability to store backup of deleted files on the receiver in different directories or with different suffix than the backup of files that have been changed but that are still on the source drive. Both commands can be

I've upgraded all my Windows servers with the new released cwRsync version, so they're all running the latest rsync now. But this version seems to ignore exitcodes, since my batchscript does not restart the job when a timeout occurs. Before, rsync did set the errorlevel on exit, so my script knew what to do then. When you just give an empty rsync command, it should also exit with an

Hello All, I have compiled Rsync 2.6.4 on HP UX 11 using gcc 4.0. rsync binary fails to query DNS for a host name. If I give IP address instead of host name everything works ok. I tried to run snoop on DNS server by failed to recieve any packets. This would mean that rsync is not every hitting DNS server. I get this error message *rsync -v hello:: rsync: getaddrinfo: hello 873: host nor

What does rsync do with permissions? Using rsync -auvP ./* targetMachine:/targetDir I sometimes get an error/warning such as: chown GENERO/uk/reinsure/prod/rel/dbmodify.4gl : Operation not permitted The source file has owner/group stevet:dev and the target stevet:users The files are being rsync'd as user 'fyl' - fyl belongs to both dev and users group. The 'oddity' is