similar to: Lion OS X tinc issues.

I have an application where a call-in user is prompted to enter an identification number for schedule information. That id number is setup as an extension, and if that extension doesn't exist, it tells them that they are not scheduled, then loops back to ask for the id number again. My problem is that asterisk pre-emptively goes to the i extension (invalid) too early depending on available

Hi, I've recently started using Samba4 (Sernet binary, 4.0.16 on Centos 6) as PDC. I would like to assign unix attributes using MMC console "Active Directory Users and Computers" however every time I'm trying to do this I get an error "Unable to modify the object property values. Check your credentials. There could be a network problem blahblahblah".. I've

Hi ! First of all, I am sorry if this is not the list for that, but I've been learning (a little bit...) a way to implement a freeBSD firewall. So far I came up with a set of rules I would like to show you for commenting. I am sure there're a lot of errors and/or stupid rules (I am not sure the rules order is good for what I need) and I would be really pleased if one could have a look

I have a model for a task class. When I try to save a task, for some reason no INSERT statement is being generated. Here''s the pertinent part of the development.log: ------------------------------------ Processing TasksController#create_fromProject (for 70.247.24.238 at 2006-03-08 14:20:30) [POST] Parameters: {"commit"=>"Create",

Hello. I just started to use rspec stories. I followed the following tutorial: http://www.tomtenthij.co.uk/2008/1/25/rspec-plain-text-story-runner-on-a-fresh-rails-app So I implemented my story and some of the steps are: (...) When "user creates a product" do post "products/new", :name => @name end Then "there should be a product named

I''m getting my zones confused. Help. I need to have a bunch of systems using OpenVPN to gain an IP in the virtual subnet 10.100.1.0/24, on interface tun0. I will then route whole subnets to those IPs, like 10.100.2.0/24 via 10.100.1.12, etc. I want to have a policy for: - all hosts behind tun0 - all hosts in 10.100.1.0/24 - individual subnets being routed through IPs in

Hi security@ list, In my self written, large ipfw rule set, I had something that passed http to allow me to browse most but not all remote sites. For years I assumed the few sites I had difficulty with were cases pppoed MTU != 1500, from not having installed tcpmssd on my 4.*-RELEASE, but then running 6.1-RELEASE I realised that wasn't the problem. http://www.web.de Still failed, &

Hi folks, I have the two firewalls (Slackware current) in differnt cities connected via OpenVPN. I can ping the network behind server firewall from client firewall server. But how to route/iptable network traffic from the network behind client firewall to see the netwrok behind server firewall? Thank you Remus

Hello, I have been reading through the documentation and trying to set up a very small VPN as a test for a larger rollout that I would like to complete in the future but cannot get this working. The configuration seems like it should be relatively simple, so I'm most likely missing something basic but I just cannot see what I'm doing wrong. At the moment I am trying to get this working

Hello, i have a little question. My system: ip route: 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 default via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 proto static metric 425 10.8.0.1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.6 88.198.140.127 via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 192.168.2.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.101 metric 425 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel

Hello all, We have a few aliased Ethernet addresses on our server and if I do not use the Bind statement in the "Global" section then the NMBD seems to try to bind to all of the addresses. We are actually using OpenVPN which make the connections just fine on a 172.16.x.x subnet to "tun0" device. The problem is that Samba does not seem to find the tun0 device and reports

Hi, I posted this question yesterday on the Openvpn mailing list, with no response, figured I will ask here too. I have been using openvpn for quite a while, no major problems encountered. Now I need to allow the server to access the lan of the client, and I can not figure out the routing. This is what I have after the tunnel is brought up: SERVER (A.A.A.A) Arx:~# ip addr ... 3: eth1:

/-----------------------\ | | |eth0 |eth0 |-------| |-------| | |eth1 eth1 | | -------- A |____ _______| B |----- | | \ / | | --------| | | --------| | | | |

Hi, I'm trying to run tinc 1.0.9 on freebsd 7.1-RELEASE-p4. I tried: Device=/dev/net/tun0 DeviceType=tun I tried it without the device-line, i tried the other devicetype-options, none of them work. With all of them I get the following error: 30311: open("/dev/net/tun0",O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK,05024360414) = 3 (0x3) 30311: ioctl(3,TUNSIFHEAD,0xbfbfec58) ERR#45 'Operation not

Hi everybody, I have been using Shorewall for quite a while now but I recently stumbled over a new setup that stopped me cold. I don''t know how to proceed: I have an ordinary GNU/Linux box (2.6.11) connected to a nonpublic network with one interface eth0 which gets an IP through DHCP like 172.17.x.y. Traffic is not routed to the Internet in this subnet. In order to connect to the

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

I''ve just discovered that I do not have access to the remote gateways for a set of IPsec tunnels to remote networks. This prevents me from changing the routing table on those gateways. I need "roadwarrior" systems connecting to me local network using OpenVPN (tun) to be able to access those systems. Since the remote gateways don''t know about 10.100.1.0/24, where my

Hi all, I try to receive an ipv6 address for my PPP link via autoconf (against Cisco machine), but there is a problem I'm unable to solve so far. I can see cisco's Router-Advertisement containing prefix etc., but no IP adress is assigned to tun0 interface. Anyone succesful in IPv6 over dial-up PPP connection? When I manually assign IPv6 address, connection works. My system is

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML