similar to: N Hosts on an Untrusted LAN in Full Mesh?

Hi everyone, Is there an easy way to combine the counts from table()? Let's say that I have: x<-1:4 y<-2:5 I want to replicate: table(c(x,y)) using only table(x) and table(y) as input. The reason is that it's cumbersome to carry all the values around when all I care about are the counts. The actual situation has about a billion counts over ~150 categories. I know there's

I am running 4.8-STABLE. I recently did a cvsup (repeatedly, most recently today). Ever since, portupgrade dies with the following messages: zircon# portupgrade -r pkgconfig /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:310:in `deorigin': failed to convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:903:in `tsort_build' from

Hi, I am Jean-christophe Kermagoret from SIDE-Labs. SIDE-Labs, founded by BlueXML, is an open source project which created a sustainable IDE, SIDE, based on MDA (Model Driven Architecture), to quickly develop sustainable software application. Moreover, thanks to the use of models, development can be achieved by domain specialist. From a technological point of view, a generation process

Hi everyone. I'm wondering whether a setup like the one described below would be possible with Tinc: nodeA1 nodeB3 | | (Network A) --- [GWA] --- (Internet) --- [GWB] --- (Network B) | | nodeA2

Hello, I tried to plot some 3d-plots with the 'mesh' function, but I allways get the message 'Fehler: konnte Funktion "mash" nicht finden' in english this means 'error: can't find the function "mesh"'. Do I need another package? I didn't found anything in the web this afternoon, only descriptions how to use the function. I looked up a lot of

tinc uses direct UDP communication for performance, not reliability. If you want to establish more metaconnections for increased reliability, you can use AutoConnect (though it probably won't work across NATs). A better solution is to use two central nodes (instead of one) for redundancy. On 11 June 2015 at 18:59, Daniel J. Grinkevich <danielgrinkevich at gmail.com> wrote: > If we

Hi, There is a question that I am confused. I have a set of data like this: hsa-miR-205--GATA3 0.797882767 1.08E-13 hsa-miR-205--ITGB4 0.750217593 1.85E-11 hsa-miR-187--PGF 0.797604155 3.24E-11 hsa-miR-205--SERPINB5 0.744124886 3.28E-11 hsa-miR-205--PBX1 0.734487224 7.89E-11 hsa-miR-205--MCC 0.72499934 1.80E-10 hsa-miR-205--WNT5B 0.717705259 3.33E-10 hsa-miR-200c--PKN2 0.721746815

Hi. I read that one feature of tink vpn solution is the Automatic Full Mesh Routing support that is defined as: "regardless of how you set up the tinc daemons to connect to each other, VPN traffic is always (if possible) sent directly to the destination, without going through intermediate" hops. What this means? I don't understand how this work. Can you please give me some

http://www.open-mesh.org/ Idea #1: is BATMAN worth considering using as part of the layer 2 routing in Tinc? Idea #2: would it be possible to embed BATMAN as an option to avoid having to use Quagga for routing v6 subnets? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

We have a handful of nodes set up. Some are NAT'd but a few have direct access to the Internet. Sample confs: HostA: Name = HostA AddressFamily = any Interface = tap0 Mode = switch Connectto = HostB GraphDumpFile = /tmp/mesh HostB: Name = HostB AddressFamily = any Interface = tap0 Mode = switch Connectto = HostA GraphDumpFile = /tmp/mesh And so on. If I use HostA as the main meta sever.

Hi, if we are to configure Tinc just like a traditional server-client VPN, what would be the options to set in the configuration file to achieve that. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20160501/b5d5935f/attachment.html>

I've been slowly reviewing our KCC patch series by Douglas and Garming into Samba git master over the past few days, and I expect that to be fully merged shortly. The purpose of this work is to change Samba from full-mesh replication to respecting site boundaries, and so trying to reduce WAN replication traffic. However, I need the help of Samba administrators to ensure this work is ready

> My idea is to register the same DNS name with as many IP addresses as i have 'servers' and may be some 'clients' with public IPs. The point is, a single DNS name will have all servers behind it, so the benefits are: You even need extra hosts files for every server, so why make it complicated? Other idea: Create 3 internet tinc server names in dns and 3 host files. Use as

On 4 June 2015 at 22:36, Johannes Ernst <johannes.ernst at gmail.com> wrote: > It seems to me that if Node B is supposed to be able to send stuff directly to Node C (instead of Node A), Node B needs to know where Node C is. Does this mean that each Node has to have a complete network map? This seems to become very unwieldy with larger deployments. Yes, each node knows about the entire

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Darren Mobley <corpdecker at gmail.com> wrote: > I've tried IRC in #tinc and #pfsense on freenode for this, not luck yet, > figured I'd try the mailing list. > > A summary of my problem is here: > > https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/789xus/tinc_vpn_can_do_everything_but_be_accessed/ > > If there are any details I can

Hi I have a Tinc cluster of about 100 nodes, and they are all running tinc 1.1pre14. I'd like to upgrade to tinc 1.1pre15. Is there a suggested mechanism to do this while keeping the cluster up? For instance can I simply automate the installation of tinc 1.1pre15 on each node and reload the existing configuration using 'tinc reload' Will the temporary state of having a mix set of

Is there some information somewhere that explains just how exactly the ?full mesh routing? works? It seems to me that if Node B is supposed to be able to send stuff directly to Node C (instead of Node A), Node B needs to know where Node C is. Does this mean that each Node has to have a complete network map? This seems to become very unwieldy with larger deployments. How far does tinc reasonably

Hi List, I want to read several parameters from data frame and load them as object into R session, Is there any package or function in R for this?? Here is example param <-c("clust_num", "minsamp_size", "maxsamp_size", "min_pct", "max_pct") value <-c(15, 20000, 200000, 0.001, .999) data <- data.frame ( cbind(param , value)) data

I admit that I am not familiar with Tinc very well but see that Tinc is running their current vpn connections. We have a scenario that has 20 different sites currently and successfully using tinc on openwrt but I am having issues adding an additional site as it will not communicate with the rest. I am not the one that originally setup the system but that person is no longer available. I have

Hi, I wrote a draft puppet module to maintain a L2 mesh based on tinc [1]. I tried to explain what it is about so that it makes sense even to people who know nothing about tinc [2]. Before polishing it so that it can be useful to the general public instead of just myself, I would very much appreciate your comments. This is my first experience with tinc and I would like to improve :-) Thanks for