similar to: Saw people asking about the IPv6 example

Hi Michael, when I was looking for information on tinc in combination with IPv6, I also found your new tutorial at that time (earlier this month). Somehow a couple of things are less clear to me in the newer tutorial (maybe the nice network topology image is missing). OK, you added the unique local addresses to the setup. But I dont't get it how the routing is done in your setup. You

For tinc users on OpenWRT: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/29137 ciao :) Saverio

1. The UDT library is a BSD-licensed accelerated UDP-based transport. Would tinc be able to use this for UDP-based connections and would the licensing be acceptable? http://udt.sourceforge.net/index.html 2. I would like to see a 3rd compression protocol added to tinc: one based on the Mahoney compression schemes would be worth investigating (need something fast and uses small RAM on

Hi everyone! I'm about to try setting up an IPv6 VPN with tinc and I'm following mostly this example on the tinc web page: http://tinc-vpn.org/examples/ipv6-network/ Unfortunately there seems to be a problem on the wiki page: The tinc.conf file for the 'master router' (Section 'Configuration Files' -> 4.) is missing and instead the text

Hello, It's almost time for a new release: 1.0. We would like this release to support all the platforms supported by 1.0pre8: GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, MacOS/X (Darwin) and Solaris (SunOS). Furthermore, we also would like to see tinc ported to the following platforms: GNU/Hurd, Windows (Cygwin/MingW/native) However, all the main developers work mainly with Linux and have little

You have a typo in your routes: fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/6 abcd vs. adcd On 21 May 2015, at 19:35, Martin <martinmoen at gmail.com<mailto:martinmoen at gmail.com>> wrote: I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:16:37PM -0800, Dave Taht wrote: > I have been gradually moving more tinc servers over to ipv6 addresses > on the tinc 1.1 branch. > > Tinc is inserting a default route for ipv6 for some reason... > > default via 2600:3c01:e030:f2::1 dev tinc6 proto static metric 950 > pref medium > > In my case the default route supplied by ra is still

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:41:12PM +0000, Håvard Rabbe wrote: > Im using tinc to bridge networks together. And im using ebtables to block dhcp traffic for ipv4 on each node in tinc. One of my nodes have recently began using ipv6. The isp is using auto configuration to give out ipv6 addresses. The problem is that every computer in my bridged network is getting ipv6 addresses from that node.

Hi thank you for looking in to this. I haven't tried it before now. I cant get it to work. after running the commands you suggest I get this when I run ip6tables --list-rules root at JOTVPN:~# ip6tables --list-rules -P INPUT ACCEPT -P FORWARD ACCEPT -P OUTPUT ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i vpn -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 133 -j DROP -A FORWARD -o vpn -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 134 -j

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:17:07AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > I want to serve IPv4 subnets 10.1.0.0/16 (machine A) and 10.2.0.0/16 > (machine B), and IPv6 subnets fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 (machine A) and > fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 (machine B) respectively. The jails are > connected on lo1. [...] > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > ifconfig

hi It was not working when i applied the rules on the vpn card. But I wondered if maybe bridging of vpn and eth0 was messing this up. I thought it was enough to only apply it to the vpn card root at JOTVPN:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled    interfaces bridge 8000.000c29638a7e no           eth0                                                                   vpn so I tried the

Hi, thanks. Sorry for the mess with my gmail account... This made the route go away. But is this the right way to configure tinc? To give the tinc interface an IP (with 255.255.255.255 subnetmask) from the local (green) network it does route the traffic to? Does it make sense to give the tinc interface an 192.168.0.253 IP, when the net here is 192.168.0.0/24 on eth1 I can not find such a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using tinc to connect a couple of ipv6 capable machines using a mix of upd6, udp4, tcp6 and tcp4. Now I wanted to add an linux embedded device, which has no ipv6 support at all. Tinc did compile and configuration is fine (tested on other machine), but after connecting the embedded device to other hosts tinc instances, it suddenly crashes.

Guus Sliepen [2016-05-24 11:26 +0200] : > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:17:07AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: [...] > > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 prefixlen 80 > > route -6 add -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > > route -6 add -net

Here is some examples of using templates for TINC configurations and settings: In your startup script, BEFORE starting TINC VPN, put a number of entries to configure your VPN: sh ./templatewriter.sh LAN LOSI101 8540 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 10.99.0.11 10.98.0.11 ConnectTo=LOSI102 ConnectTo= ConnectTo= **PUT MORE ENTRIES HERE FOR MORE COMPLEX VPN setups ######Templatewriter.sh #!/bin/bash

I have been gradually moving more tinc servers over to ipv6 addresses on the tinc 1.1 branch. Tinc is inserting a default route for ipv6 for some reason... default via 2600:3c01:e030:f2::1 dev tinc6 proto static metric 950 pref medium In my case the default route supplied by ra is still the correct thing, but I don't see where in the code tinc is inserting this route from.... which, as

Hi Im using tinc to bridge networks together. And im using ebtables to block dhcp traffic for ipv4 on each node in tinc. One of my nodes have recently began using ipv6. The isp is using auto configuration to give out ipv6 addresses. The problem is that every computer in my bridged network is getting ipv6 addresses from that node. The other computers behind the other nodes have no use for ipv6

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:43:44PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > - On Linux, add "echo 0 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/$INTERFACE/accept_ra" > to tinc-up before any ifconfig or ip commands. Ah, if it's only the default route you don't want, then it's: echo 0 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/$INTERFACE/accept_ra_defrtr -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,

Hi, At my provider (xs4all) I've got an ipv6 tunnel working. Now I would like to distribute ipv6 via the tinc tunnel. My tinc.conf: ------------ Name=server AddressFamily=ipv4 Device=/dev/net/tun PrivateKeyFile=/etc/tinc/fvhglobalnet/rsa_key.priv GraphDumpFile=|/usr/bin/dot -Tpng -o /var/www/htdocs.keetweej.vanheusden.com/stats/tinc-fvh-network-graph.png Mode=switch KeyExpire=299