similar to: Weird behaviour between Windows Vista & Windows 7 VPN - can anyone help?

Hello All, I am trying to configure 2 Vista nodes. For testing, I put them both on the same LAN & subnet, and after figuring out that Vista puts the RSA_Key private File & the Hosts files in a different directory { \USERS\username\APPDATA\LOCAL\VIRTUALSTORE\PROGRAM FILES\TINC\ (+hosts\) }, I managed to bring up the daemons on both nodes. (I suspect that Windows 7 uses another directory

Thanks for the quick reply, Guus. Well the debug helped a little bit. So did re-reading the manual again. I think I got further ahead, but unfortunately I still cannot quite get to complete the connection between the two nodes. It looks like the two nodes are communicating - they seem to be able to exchange RSA keys & MetaKeys, but for some reason, they start trying to exchange data on

I am at a loss to explain why it still doesn't work. I regenerated the keys and have eliminated the 'Bogus data received message'. In fact, the debug log looks totally normal now. However, when I try to 'ping' from the Home PC to the Office PC, I get a 'request timed out' message & Windows Networking is still not able to see the PC at the other end. I do see a

Finally resolved the problem, I'm actually impressed with the throughput over the tinc VPN! I encountered & resolved two problems during this installation. First, the config files need to go in different places, depending on whether you run tinc as a service or in the foreground from a Command Prompt running as Administrator (C:\Program Files\tinc\...) or if you are running tinc in the

Yes, I am aware of this. It does not affect my problem; however, I have isolated the problem to the Norton Internet Security Firewall & I am working with their Engineering group to solve it. Cheers, Alan ------Original Message------ From: Peter Dey Sender: tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org ReplyTo: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: New issue, configuring 2 Vista nodes

Hello, 2 questions: 1. I see from the archives that Vista support requires downloading an updated TAP driver from OpenVPN.net. I have just downloaded tinc 1.0.13 and was not able to get the TAP driver to work on my Windows 7 computer. Should I assume that 1.0.13 doesn't have the most current TAP driver and I should use the one I downloaded from OpenVPN ? There seems to be

Hello, sorry for the delay, kinit goes fine, here is the output of klist : Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal: administrator at RONA.LOC Valid starting Expires Service principal 15.08.2017 13:36:07 15.08.2017 23:36:07 krbtgt/RONA.LOC at RONA.LOC renew until 16.08.2017 13:36:03 ------ here's the output of smbclient -k -L //sambadc.rona.loc -d9

Hello, I've a problem joining windows 7 samba4 ad I'm doing a completely clean install on debian 9.1 When trying to join AD Win 7 gives me "internal error" I also get error on "Verifying the File Server" step of the https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_ Active_Directory_Domain_Controller here's the output: smbclient -L localhost -U% session

hi, can you post a ipconfig /all from the windows pc also. a quick look at the server config looks ok to me. and does smbclient -L $(hostname -f) -U% -m smb2 work. greetz, Louis > Op 9 aug. 2017 om 17:23 heeft Vladimir Frelikh via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > Sorry forgot to mention samba version and build options: > > samba -b >

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:14:33 +0700 Vladimir Frelikh via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=7f6f030913&view= > > att&th=15dc2ba7d7a63129&attid=0.1&disp=safe&realattid=f_j63tfts50&zw> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best

Hello, I''m trying to put 3 nodes in a vpn in tunnel mode. When I run setkey on the following file, I end up with The result of line 33: File exists. That error isn''t overly helpful, so I was hoping that someone could explain the issue. Here''s the file, with line 33 highlighted. Help appreciated. Mike # Flush the SAD and SPD flush; spdflush; # Add SA for

Hi, I've changed /etc/resolv.conf, rebooted, here is the output: cat /etc/resolv.conf domain rona.loc search rona.loc nameserver 192.168.19.2 ------ smbclient -L $(hostname -f) -UAdministrator%<password> -d5 INFO: Current debug levels: all: 5 tdb: 5 printdrivers: 5 lanman: 5 smb: 5 rpc_parse: 5 rpc_srv: 5 rpc_cli: 5 passdb: 5 sam: 5 auth: 5 winbind: 5 vfs: 5

===================================================================== "The only place success comes before work is in the dictionary." Vince Lombardi ===================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.2. Changes since 4.2.2: -------------------- o Michael

===================================================================== "The only place success comes before work is in the dictionary." Vince Lombardi ===================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.2. Changes since 4.2.2: -------------------- o Michael

Hi, I have a routing problem. When i start tinc it creates the following route in the main routing table. 192.168.2.0/24 dev nb003004 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.8 The problem is that i want to use extra routing tables for each tinc vpn. When i set the netmask for the tinc device to 255.255.255.255. The route is not created, how can i add it to a another route table. Setting a

hi, here is the output from win 7 machine, cutted non-us local symbols are substituted by [cut]: Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : testing Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No Ethernet adapter [cut]: Connection-specific DNS Suffix

Xen-system AMD x64 2GB Memory installed with Domain 0 Linux Fedora 7 + Xen 3.1 + 2.6.18-xen i386 Domain 0 Linux Fedora 7 + Xen 3.1 + 2.6.18-xen x64 HVM - Vista 32 Ultimate + xenbus Vista 64 Ultimate + xenbus The DTM studio/controller was based on microsoft WLK 1.0c + update fileter patch (MS logo kit filter update every day) for more detail please

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:40:15 +0700 Vladimir Frelikh via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, sorry for the delay, > kinit goes fine, here is the output of > klist : > > Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 > Default principal: administrator at RONA.LOC > > Valid starting Expires Service principal > 15.08.2017 13:36:07 15.08.2017

Hi, I have installed mongrel on Vista and my app runs *really* slowly. Checking Net stats in firebug shows each html request for the assets taking ~1s. Running same app on XP is fine and running as webrick on vista is fine too. There is also a strange pattern : each of the http requests to mongrel take marginally more than 1s, e.g. 1.04, 1.05 on webrick each request takes ~ 4-40ms. Very odd

Hi Everyone, I was hoping some one could help me out with an issue I''m having with mongrel on Vista. I have a ruby on rails application that runs fine with mongrel when I double click on it. Command window opens, server starts and works just fine. For the same application, after I install the service using mongrel_service, and I try to start it, it fails. Vista says that the