similar to: key managment roadmap

Hi, Here is my goal. Can I do this with tinc? I have a mobile broadband card, and my machine runs a webserver, email server, and a public vcs. But I have four problems: 1. Port 25 is blocked so I have to use an elaborate convulsion to allow me to send mails. 2. It has a dynamic IP address so I have to use dynamic DNS. 3. There's no way for me to set up reverse DNS (that I know of). 4. They

> Currently, i have nodes with PMTUDiscovery =yes and ClampMSS = yes. Hello, these features were introduced in 1.0.13 correct ?? I also understand that the two settings are by default "yes" if not explictly set to "no" in the config file. what may happen if I have a network with mixed versions from 1.0.11 and 1.0.13, where the older daemons do not implement that feature

For tinc users on OpenWRT: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/29137 ciao :) Saverio

Hello, I'm upgrading to 1.0.14 I did some manual tricks in my Gentoo Portage because seems that upstream Gentoo did not update the portage yet, does anybody know how to Contact Gentoo Linux to have the package updated ? Question 1: I notice in my log file I had many entries like this with 1.0.13: 1307284053 tinc.ninux[15152]: Lost 251 packets from GREG1 (151.28.100.141 port 655)

Hello Maxim, did you send the pull request ? Please send an email to the list when you do thank you Saverio 2016-11-05 10:09 GMT+01:00 Saverio Proto <zioproto at gmail.com>: > Hello Maxim, > thanks for stepping in ! > > so, I am not even sure how it works for commit rights, because the > people I was in touch with now forked the project to LEDE. > > Also, I always

Let me start with what I'm trying to accomplish. I use tinc mainly to get to subnets behind the daemons and I don't control those subnets and can't guarantee overlap. I was using routing mode and reconfiguring tinc every time i needed to get to a subnet behind a specific daemon. Then I came across switch mode that allowed me to simply add routes based on the IP address of the tinc

Hi, we are using Tinc in our Freifunk Network in Oldenburg for internode connections over the internet. So Tinc is running on OpenWrt 10.03 on Dlink Dir-300 Routers. We all have enough internet bandwith (1,6 MB/sec and more) but we only get a maximum speed of ~350KB/sec between two tinc nodes because then tinc uses 99% of the cpu. Is it possible to get more Speed with tinc on this machines?

Saverio, it looks I'm using tinc on OpenWRT packaged by you) Thank you for it Is something there in that task, what is harder than https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/devel/packages ? Anyway, I want to try On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:43:42PM +0100, Saverio Proto wrote: > > > I am not using OpenWrt a

Hello, today I was trying to do something easy I did with openvpn before. I have a server, and a few clients will connect to the server and route their internet traffic into the tunnel. The server then makes NAT. To configure clients in OpenVPN there was this directive called: --redirect-gateway that basically (copy and paste from OpenVPN man): 1) Create a static route for the --remote address

Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes

Hello, Anyone on this list had successfully used tinc on planet lab [0] ? I'm trying to do it but I get some problems using the tap device tincd just keeps printing this error: Error while reading from Linux ethertap device /dev/net/tun: File descriptor in bad state I guess the problem is I cannot manage tun/tap devices on the planet lab nodes even if I am root :( Look at this: bash-3.2#

On my Gentoo box I updated openssl to openssl-1.0.0a-r3 I'm not able to compile with openssl-1.0.0a-r3 if I want a static binary ./configure LDFLAGS=-static the configure scripts complains like this: checking for RAND_pseudo_bytes... no configure: error: Missing OpenSSL functionality, make sure you have installed the latest version. this was working with previous version of OpenSSL.

During Brandon Black presentation I heard that was developed a patch to prevent loss of UDP packets when tinc detects a replay attack. Is possible to have a look at that patch ? :) Saverio

There is a way to update the dot file more frequently than once a minute ? thanks :) Saverio

On a Linux Server running tincd I noticed the following log message in /var/log/messages kernel: possible SYN flooding on port 655. Sending cookies. I found this on the web: If SYN cookies are enabled, then the kernel doesn't track half open connections at all. Instead it knows from the sequence number in the following ACK datagram that the ACK very probably follows a SYN and a SYN-ACK.

Hello, to start could you tell us what version of OpenWrt are you using ? Is it a stable release ? and what version of tinc you are trying to install ? if it is just a problem with the tun/tap module, on OpenWrt you have not modprobe, so you should use insmod insmod tun Saverio

I received this PR for the tinc package on OpenWrt. https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/7646/files Not sure if this is something that is better going upstream instead. Moreover, from a security point of view, is it okay to merge this patch ? thank you Saverio

Hi, My CentOS has upgrade the openssl to 1.1.1a, and I thought my tinc(1.0.35) installed by yum will use the new openssl, but it looks not the fact. So is tinc(1.0.35) support openssl 1.1.1a? If so, how can I make it running in this version of openssl?

Hello, I successfully set up a tunnel with tinc using the tun interface. however I need a tap device, because I need to run the OLSR routing protocol on the tunnel and if I use the tun mode OLSR will just skip the interface. (It is a well known thing, I had this issue before also when using OpenVPN in the past). The problem is that I cannot make tinc use a tap device. I created the tap0

The following is maybe a bug report, and a proposed patch. Using latest stable tinc 1.0.12. I have a central server and a few clients connecting to this server. I don't want clients to speak directly, but I want all the communications to pass by the server. My configuration is: Mode = switch TunnelServer = Yes I need layer2 because of some ethernet stuff on the clients. When you have