similar to: FW: New issue, configuring 2 Vista nodes behind Norton Internet Security 2010 Firewalls

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "FW: New issue, configuring 2 Vista nodes behind Norton Internet Security 2010 Firewalls"

2010 Jul 20
2
New issue, configuring 2 Vista nodes
Hello All, I am trying to configure 2 Vista nodes. For testing, I put them both on the same LAN & subnet, and after figuring out that Vista puts the RSA_Key private File & the Hosts files in a different directory { \USERS\username\APPDATA\LOCAL\VIRTUALSTORE\PROGRAM FILES\TINC\ (+hosts\) }, I managed to bring up the daemons on both nodes. (I suspect that Windows 7 uses another directory
2011 Jun 20
1
Weird behaviour between Windows Vista & Windows 7 VPN - can anyone help?. Still no success
I am at a loss to explain why it still doesn't work. I regenerated the keys and have eliminated the 'Bogus data received message'. In fact, the debug log looks totally normal now. However, when I try to 'ping' from the Home PC to the Office PC, I get a 'request timed out' message & Windows Networking is still not able to see the PC at the other end. I do see a
2011 Jun 12
1
Weird behaviour between Windows Vista & Windows 7 VPN - can anyone help?
I am trying to connect a Windows Vista (Home) machine to a Windows 7 (Office) machine. I set up the tinc config files normally, and I am able to see the Vista (Home) machine from the Window 7 (Office) machine, but I cannot seem to do the reverse. I am beginning to wonder if this might be a known issue that someone has seen before. My configuration is as follows: Office PC
2010 Jul 21
0
Fw: New issue, configuring 2 Vista nodes
Yes, I am aware of this. It does not affect my problem; however, I have isolated the problem to the Norton Internet Security Firewall & I am working with their Engineering group to solve it. Cheers, Alan ------Original Message------ From: Peter Dey Sender: tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org ReplyTo: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: New issue, configuring 2 Vista nodes
2010 Jul 18
2
FW: Windows 7 support? Should I be able to PING over the VPN?
Thanks for the quick reply, Guus. Well the debug helped a little bit. So did re-reading the manual again. I think I got further ahead, but unfortunately I still cannot quite get to complete the connection between the two nodes. It looks like the two nodes are communicating - they seem to be able to exchange RSA keys & MetaKeys, but for some reason, they start trying to exchange data on
2010 Jul 18
1
Windows 7 support? Should I be able to PING over the VPN?
Hello, 2 questions: 1. I see from the archives that Vista support requires downloading an updated TAP driver from OpenVPN.net. I have just downloaded tinc 1.0.13 and was not able to get the TAP driver to work on my Windows 7 computer. Should I assume that 1.0.13 doesn't have the most current TAP driver and I should use the one I downloaded from OpenVPN ? There seems to be
2004 Jan 12
2
Roadwarriors behind unknown firewalls
Hello, is it possible to run tinc behind an unknown firewall(simple NAT) e.g. on windows clients to join an tinc network? These firewalls are not maintained by me and not possible to modify. Thanks for help Kai Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc site: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/
2006 Jan 08
0
Norton IS preventing Samba workgroup from appearing in W2K browse
I know this isn't a samba configuration issue, but I'm hoping someone might have encountered this problem before and knows the solution. I just installed a Buffalo LinkStation (Linux Samba NAS) on my network and was atempting to set up a shared printer. I have three systems. All are W2K. One uses BlackICE, the others use Norton Internet Security 2004. All of the systems, including the
2004 Feb 05
1
Norton personal firewall tells me that bad TCP packets are received
This is some of the messages I get: TCP non-syn/non-ack packet on invalid connection. Packet has been dropped TCP Source Port: http(80) TCP Destination Port: 2595 TCP Message Flags: 0x00000019 The TCP message Flags varies. I''ve seen 0x00000011, 0x00000010, 0x00000018, 0x00000004, 0x00000014 and 0x00000019. Intrusion: Invalid TCP Flags TCP Source Port: 6881 TCP Destination Port: 4307
2010 Nov 30
1
3 tinc nodes (2 behind nat and 1 with a public ip).
Hi, I have 3 tinc nodes. 2 nodes, A and B are behind a nat router. And node C with a public ipaddress. I don't now the private ipadress for node A en B. So i don't use a ipaddress adres in the host file for node A en B. For node C is use the public ipaddress. node A en B connect to node C. But node A en B don't connect to each other. What do i have to change to connect node A
2011 Feb 22
5
Direct connections between nodes are in the same LAN (behind common NAT)
Hi I'm trying to implement a scheme in which the nodes will have a direct UDP tunnel to each other. First, all nodes make connection with one public node, and then make connections with each other. And I came across the following problem: Remotely located nodes can establish a direct UDP connection, but the nodes that are in the same local network can not, and all traffic goes through the
2002 Dec 18
1
Samba pdc, Norton Ghost enterprise edition and joinin g the domain?
Lars, You could try a batch file with NETDOM /Domain:MYDOMAIN /user:adminuser /password:apassword MEMBER MYCOMPUTER /JOINDOMAIN Then NETDOM /Domain:MYDOMAIN MEMBER MYCOMPUTER /JOINDOMAIN search microsoft.com for comand line join domain for more info. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Lars O. Grobe [mailto:grobe@gmx.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:53 AM To:
2010 May 21
1
tinc confused on remote nodes behind NAT?
Something tells me this was covered recently, but i didn't find it again in gmail. The nodes see each other but if i have something misconfigured that is decreasing my speed. All my nodes are behind NATs. i have a remote node that connects to a central node via port forwarding from public port 7777 to hp821 running on port 655. remoteNode ----> public ip 1.2.3.4:7777 ---->
2005 Apr 27
4
Does CentOS has problems with Norton Ghost 2003 images?
Hello all We have two very important workstations dedicated to tasks of development and investigation. At the moment we have installed a dual boot platform with CentOS 4.0 and Windows XP Proffessional SP2. In order to do backups of these machines we need to create an image with Norton Ghost 2003. We have worked with Ghost during several years with different platforms (Red Hat, White Box Linux,
2004 Oct 15
0
Error running various Norton Utilities
When I try to run various Norton Utilities (integrator, sysdoc, etc.) I get a message that says something about not being able to get the OS version, and the program aborts. I can post the exact message (I'm not at my linux box right now). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2002 Dec 18
1
Samba pdc, Norton Ghost enterprise edition and joining the domain?
Hi List. We have a Samba 3.0pre21 PDC set up here on our prim. fileserver. We use Windows 2000 SP2 on our PC clients. We install clients with system images from disk and than install applications from one central machine running Norton Ghost EE. Ghost has the functionality not only to install the software from the "console" on the ghost server, but it is also able to make the
2000 Mar 25
3
RFH -> Request for Help.
Hello all, I've been playing with tinc to setup a wan between two offices of the company that I work for. I'm partially there but having a slight problem. tinc comes up between the 2 machines (both 2.2.14 debian woody machines), and I can ping from the vpn machine at office a, and get a response from office b. However, if I ping any other machine across the wan I can't get a
2001 Mar 08
2
Tinc behind firewall?
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:51:53AM +0100, Marcel Loesberg wrote: > I'm going to build a VPN and I want to use either Tinc or FreeS/WAN. > I've started building the VPN with FreeS/WAN and I find things are getting > rather complicated. > I looks like Tinc is much easier to configure but in the FAQ and in what I've > seen of the documentation so far there is no mention of
2010 Dec 16
3
tinc node behind nat router.
I have some tinc nodes behind a nat router. Which ipaddress should i use in de host file for the tinc nodes behind a nat router. The internet ipaddress or the private ipaddress ? Perry
2014 Oct 28
2
Node behind SonicWall Router
Recently the small business I work at replaced an aging linksys wrt style router with a SonicWall one. Ever since this change I have issues with this node falling back to TCP constantly. TCP for me ends up performing very sub-par, and most of the time unworkable. For some reason too the connection usually ends up being routed through another node. I created a new tinc instance using TAP