similar to: tinc optimal packet route selection

Hi guys and gals, I just wanted to compile tinc with vde interface, but found src/vde is missing in tar balls of tinc-1.0.16 and tinc-1.0.14. I remember once I have compiled vde on tinc-1.0.14. Is it removed intentionally? I couldn't find an update in ChangeLog. Besides, the newest code in git fails to compile, because of a redefined extern static variable in src/vde/device.c. I need to

hey, is there a way to run tinc on a (linux) box, with a public ip, but on which i don't have root privileges ? the server just connects nodes (behind natted firewall) & relays their traffic, so no need for tap/tun interface on the box itself. ptr_ -- http://www.L45.be/voidpointer 0493 52 5009

Hello, Please tell me if it's possible to use tinc together with OSPF (instead of static routes in LAN). By OSPF I mean Quagga's GNU/Linux daemon. Namely, I have a group of LANs (private 192.168.x.0/24 each). Each LAN has a GNU/Linux default gateway, 192.168.x.1, that also connects to the Internet via a public IP address (does NAT and firewall for the LAN "behind" it). tinc

Hi, The network topo looks like this: the original network: router1 router2 | | |----------------OSPF------------| the target network: (we need to insert a transparent firewall between these 2 routers, so a proxy arp is set up on firewall to bridge router1 and router2) router1 firewall router2 |

Hi iproute2, I have a network to reach which is 192.168.2.0/24. It is a branch of the company. I have currently added a route to that network via one gateway ( 192.168.0.254) in following way. ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.0.254 Now, We got another gateway which is 192.168.0.250. Now I want to add a route to the same network which is 192.168.2.0/24 via this gateway ( 192.168.0.250)

Hi, all! Can I enable multicasting via shorewall? I have router with Gentoo Linux (one interface to ISP, one with alises - to local network). Shorewall work perfect! But now I need setup Quagga (zebra) for dynamic routing between one more router via another provider. All routers daemons (zebra, ripd, ospf) used multicasting. In my configuration already enabled allowBcast and etc.

I am setting up 2 Vyatta routers that will serve as redundant failover core routers out to the backbone of our ISP. They will be serving for routing between other branches and the ISP and bandwidth management. I am trying to differentiate between the plethora of information about having redundant, automatic failover routers and pretty much decided on VRRP for the IP address failover mechanism. I

Hi Everyone, I have a routing situation where Tinc looks like it could come in extremely useful, but I have a query I hope someone can cast an eye on, as I'm unsure whether Tinc can help me here. I currently have a Quagga OSPF linux router which connects LAN A to LAN B over the quickest available of two routes (both routes at both ends connect to Quagga boxes to prevent collisions). One of

Hi all, I am behind a firewall which only let UDP 80 go through. In order to connect to an outside public node by UDP, I can set ... Port = 80 ... However, an httpd is running on the public node, occupying TCP 80. How can I configure tinc to bind on TCP 8080 but listen to UDP 80? Redirecting UDP 80 to UDP 8080 on the public node is one method. Is there a more elegant way to

Hello All, Ive been doing more and more research on trying to setup a cluster/load balancer for Asterisk. All the Asterisk boxes would be using a config that is the same between them all (via a DB), but we want one location to point the phones to, and from there that machine/device will send it to a Asterisk server so the call can be processed. I know you cant balance the whole call, ie: once the

Commit-ID: 8c6e2cecf64aed820dd63a1c4dcb3b141f0414ec Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=8c6e2cecf64aed820dd63a1c4dcb3b141f0414ec Author: kabe at sra-tohoku.co.jp <kabe at sra-tohoku.co.jp> AuthorDate: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:50:23 +0900 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] builtin:

Commit-ID: 9b271c8b259fff6930f58d2ea3346b0bdd5e66c2 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=9b271c8b259fff6930f58d2ea3346b0bdd5e66c2 Author: kabe at sra-tohoku.co.jp <kabe at sra-tohoku.co.jp> AuthorDate: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:50:23 +0900 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash:

Dear all, I'm new user of R package. I'm trying to interpolate climate variables from ERA data. Original data contains 6 column with 29,040 lines, and x, y dimension are 240x121. I would like to get new data from column name: "lon", "lat" and "temp" by x, y dimension are 3,586x1,800 So I used the code as below, but I got error message as "z[cbind(lx1

What shorewall rules would be required to allow the OSPF routing protocol to pass fw<->loc? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Ben

After installing Zebra for ripd to get win2k routes I am getting this May 20 23:24:20 ns1 kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=64.42.53.202 DST=64.42.53.207 LEN=92 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=520 DPT=520 LEN=72 May 20 23:25:25 ns1 last message repeated 3 times I am new to zebra, so I am assuming that this is broadcasting to windoz for routes weird !!!

Well, this is a major pain in the ass. I got realtime static working for sip.conf. 'Great!' I thought. That was until I realised I couldn't use it. Our Asterisk systems are using OSPF and listen on interface lo:1. Asterisk doesn't like to use an interface name for it's bindaddr setting, so you have to put the IP address of lo:1 in there. If you put in 0.0.0.0, it seems to

Before I start, I don''t want to do ECMP or simple bonding ... I have multiple Internet connections available to multiple boxes on one of my networks. Box A connects to ISPs 1, 2 and 3 Box B connects to ISPs 1 and 4 Boxes A and B are both connected to each other and the rest of the network. 1) I would like to set up some dynamic routing in such a way that any given outgoing packet from

I''ve got a linux router pushing 600-1000 pppoe connections through it. I''m getting a screen error "Neighbor Table Overflow" after this box has been up for between 1 week and 1 month. When this is happening, routing slows to a crawl if at all. Then dies. I''ve added: # Added to stop "neighbor table overflow" messages in the kernel

I have a fairly simply laid out network that could easily use static routing. However, I plan to expand quickly and don''t wish to spend the better part of my life maintaining static routes. INTERNET | --------- Gateway | - LAN 172.16.1.x | - LINK 192.168.1.1 --------- |<----wifi --------- router 2 | -LAN 172.16.2.x | -Link 192.168.1.2 ---------

Hi List, FYI. We have been using CentOS 6.4 and have 2 vpn/gre tunnels to separate cisco rtrs using ospf. with kernel 2.6.32-358.23.2 We have upgraded to 6.5 bit using kernel 2.6.32-431.5.1 and the exact same configuration scripts for our vpn/gre tunnels. What I see is the first gre tunnel works great and I get an ospf neighbor. The second tunnel comes up and I can ping across it and I see