similar to: Broadcast-Storm

Hi Everyone, I have a routing situation where Tinc looks like it could come in extremely useful, but I have a query I hope someone can cast an eye on, as I'm unsure whether Tinc can help me here. I currently have a Quagga OSPF linux router which connects LAN A to LAN B over the quickest available of two routes (both routes at both ends connect to Quagga boxes to prevent collisions). One of

Hello World, I have met tinc a few days ago and started with a simple connection between 2 machines. I have fallen in love witht tinc, it's very simple to configure, although I haven't used tinc in production yet, because of its simplicity I think it's very robust. I also like how the configuration is organized with hosts/ directory, up/down scripts. Thank you for such a great tool.

Hello to everybody, Sorry if my english isn?t very good. I need pass 802.1q through a VPN between two offices. I have mounted a WRT54GL, with OpenWRT firmware, conected to a switch trunk port in both offices. In the switch of the first office I have created five tagged VLANs and I need pass these VLAN to the second offices where it has created it too. Can I do this with Tinc in HUB/Switch

Goodday, Currently using tinc 1.0.24 on Debian 8.x, OVH datacentre, two servers same VRACK (ie. internal ethernet bridge/switched together). I’m wanting to get a remote server connected to both the two OVH servers for fail-over reasons, but having access via both to the shared vRack segment as a switch mode. Thereby Essentially I’m creating a ethernet loop… ----------------------vRack |

Hi, I am playing with LocalDiscovery again and have noticed that I do not see any LocalDiscovery broadcasts anymore. I am using tinc 1.1-pre9 in switch mode and have set LocalDiscovery = yes in tinc.conf. I do not see any broadcasts on any network and I also do not see anything in the debug output. What to do? -nik -- # apt-assassinate --help Usage: apt-assassinate [upstream|maintainer]

I have a Debian 8 64-bit machine set up as a server and apt-got the tinc package. I configured tinc as a bridge and everything seems normal except that the tunnel does not forward multicast traffic. I used tcpdump to examine the br0, eth0 and tap interfaces. I could see multicast packets on both br0 and eth0, but there is no such packet present on the tap interface. I don't quite know why

hi It was not working when i applied the rules on the vpn card. But I wondered if maybe bridging of vpn and eth0 was messing this up. I thought it was enough to only apply it to the vpn card root at JOTVPN:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled    interfaces bridge 8000.000c29638a7e no           eth0                                                                   vpn so I tried the

Hi all, Reading docs about using bridges in a KVM environment, I have a doubt about activating STP or not in a KVM host. What advantages and disadvantages have?? If I will want to install some kvm guests that use multicast address for certain services, is it recommended to enable STP? Thanks.

On 09/16/2015 10:15 AM, Dmitry E. Mikhailov wrote: > On 09/16/2015 03:02 PM, C.L. Martinez wrote: >> What advantages and disadvantages have?? If I will want to install >> some kvm guests that use multicast address for certain services, is it >> recommended to enable STP? > STP has nothing to do with multicast as it's an Ethernet protocol. > It's developed to

Hi thank you for looking in to this. I haven't tried it before now. I cant get it to work. after running the commands you suggest I get this when I run ip6tables --list-rules root at JOTVPN:~# ip6tables --list-rules -P INPUT ACCEPT -P FORWARD ACCEPT -P OUTPUT ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i vpn -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 133 -j DROP -A FORWARD -o vpn -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 134 -j

Hi everyone,   I am new to using tinc and currently trying to set up a full IPv6 mesh between 4 servers of mine. Setting it up went smoothly and all of the tinc clients do connect properly. Routing through the network works fine as well. There is however a large amount of management traffic which I assume should not be the case.   Here is a quick snapshot using "tinc -n netname top"

net-misc/tinc-1.0.12 works for me on amd64 1. there is an official ebuild for 1.0.11, but not for 1.0.12 yet 2. my -r1 contains changed initscript 'tincd.lo' to be used like net.lo by ln -s tincd.lo tincd.vpn_name and then calling tincd.vpn_name to start/stop 3. it is in my overlay together with latest versions of some other software:

On 12/07/2023 17:48, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:54:15PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: >> When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm >> even if STP is enabled. >> >> # unshare -n >> # ip link add br0 type bridge >> # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 >> # ip link set veth0 master

Hi all, We are facing a problem with STP implementation. We have only 2 switches. Thats the constraint, but we feel STP should work. Background: We have developed a layer 2 switch. This uses Cirrus logic's ep9301 processor, embedded Linux 2.4.21 kernel as the OS and zarlink's switch controller. The observation: 1)we have 2 switches, switch A and switch B 2)port 1 and port 2 of switch

Hello Peter, Your question is similar to my recent question, and I have a similar Ping problem.But yours, with two Tinc networks, is more complex than mine. All I can say, and I hope it helps, is that in my case I have found my Ubuntu Tinc Server nodes do not like being specified as a address on the same network as the local LANsSo I have a specific network for the Tinc Server nodes, and in this

Hi, We just found the tinc, looks like it is really a better VPN solution than traditional VPN, I am wondering, is there some cases we can refer, like is there some big cluster running in the production environment ? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have already working set of tinc nodes and tried to add one more machine, mac mini with osx yosemite onboard. Tincd starts and connects to other nodes as supposed but I can't connect to mini from any of other nodes. When I try to use ssh the following lines appears repeatedly in mini's logs along with the regular logs about making connections and MTU probes: > Got PACKET from

Hi All, >>>Clarification: I'm getting a flood of wine-users emails. Yes, I'm seeing this too. I spent all day today trying to understand why this is happening, and failed, but I think I have just now figured it out. As far as I can tell, the flood of messages are all the messages that were posted to the newsgroup since the last time the newsgroup and wine-users mailman list

>> The setup looks like this: >> web <- tinc "tiosp" -> gateway <- tinc "tiutl" -> backup Which lan ips do all your computers have? network addess will be fine. ALBI...

Hi, I've got a four site site-to-site tinc mesh working nicely. I have the following systems at two of those sites: 10.a.a.2: Linux box running tinc and DHCP/DNS for site A 10.a.a.dhcp: Windows desktop with a GPU 10.b.b.2: Linux box running tinc and DHCP/DNS for site B 10.b.b.dhcp: Linux laptop I'd like to use Steam In-Home Streaming to game in the laptop streaming from the desktop. The