similar to: Don't deprecate TCPOnly please!

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433 Bug ID: 13433 Summary: out_of_memory in receive_sums on large files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

Hi, I've successfully running tinc1.0pre4 between two locations on SuSE Linux 7.1 in a special masquerading Firewall environment, so that I'm using the TCPonly keyword in the host files to get a connection. Otherwise I would get the message 'Received UDP packet on port 655 from unknown source <ipaddress in hex:port>'. After upgrading to 1.0pre5 I'm getting this message

Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks

Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks

If the concern is more about the reliability instead of throughput, should I add TCPonly = yes in the host configuration to make the VPN runs on TCP?

The only time I can think off, that you’ll *want* to use TCP, is when UDP doesn’t work through the firewalls/NATting. > On 18 Jun 2017, at 14:53 , Bright Zhao <startryst at gmail.com> wrote: > > If the concern is more about the reliability instead of throughput, should I add TCPonly = yes in the host configuration to make the VPN runs on TCP? The problem with TCP, is that TCP,

> On 18 Jun 2017, at 15:44 , Bright Zhao <startryst at gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree with the in-effective of TCP transmission, but I wonder if the the UDP packet is dropped, the tinc VPN itself wouldn’t retransmit, and if the upper level application doesn’t handle the packet loss well, will this be the problem? > > Or the upper level application have very limited tolerance

Guus, [tinc version 1.0.24] Consider the case where you have the following setup client - fw - server The client and server successfully setup a tunnel and UDP communication starts to happen. Then the client shuts up and the server only needs to send data to the client if the remote tool accesses the client?s UI. If the firewall times out the NAT UDP hole, the server has a problem: The UDP

I agree with the in-effective of TCP transmission, but I wonder if the the UDP packet is dropped, the tinc VPN itself wouldn’t retransmit, and if the upper level application doesn’t handle the packet loss well, will this be the problem? Or the upper level application have very limited tolerance to packet loss(like RDP application, I guess if the packet loss go to certain threshold, the connection

Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes

Hello all, There is still a use for netbeui (non-routed protocol) in the network. If you are using a VPN client that does not allow split tunneling, you can still access printers on another local system with netbeui. I would like to remove the windows system and have my print shares on my Linux system with Samba. Is all consideration of netbeui within the Linux/Samba environment gone?

Hello, first of all - thanks for creating tinc! It has become an invaluable tool for me to securely join a multitude of servers and clients through a VPN. Today, I was trying to compile Tinc 1.0.12 on my newly purchased x86 Linux-based QNAP TS-239 Pro NAS device (Kernel 2.6.30.6). The configure-script finishes without error (see attached config.log). However, configure.status fails with

Hello list, we have been running tinc to connect multiple nodes without problems for quite some time now. Thanks for this great piece of software! Our configuration is as follows: Two "supernodes" A and B running the tinc daemon are publicly reachable from the internet. Node A is running Linux and has a static public IP address. Node B is running Windows with port forwarding

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Summary: Mac OS X/Darwin incorrectly shows read sockets ready when they aren't Product: rsync Version: 2.6.5 Platform: PPC OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hi there, I'm trying to set tinc and I get the following messages: Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: tincd 1.0.1 (Aug 14 2003 15:09:44) starting, debug level 0 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: Script tinc-up exited with non-zero status 126 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]:

Hi all, I'm afraid I'm back to my old issue of GPO permissions. I have two ADDCs providing an AD Domain (internal.stmaryscollege.co.uk (short-name 'SMC')). Servers are called 'ad-01' and 'tainan'. ad-01 is 'Version 4.0.10' and tainan is 'Version 4.1.0rc4' (the latest version in the package repos of the respective OSs (arch and gentoo)) I have

Hi all, I have a samba server as member of an AD DC. In said AD DC there is the 'administrator' user which has the default UID of 0 (the same as root) from the ADDC: # id administrator uid=0(root) gid=513(SMC\Domain Users) groups=0(root),513(SMC\Domain Users),3000005(SMC\Group Policy Creator Owners),3000009(SMC\Enterprise Admins),512(SMC\Domain Admins),3000007(SMC\Schema Admins) from

Sometimes even the easy stuff is difficult (for me)... I want to get input from different places to paste together an excel filename (so you know I'm using windows) that I can open with RODBC. I know about using double "\" since its an escape character, but I get either 2 or none, I can't get just one "\" where I need it. See example code below. I am using R 2.1.0,

Dear Developer, I'm having problem running ssh_keygen on my solaris 7 box. Can you please tell me as to why I'm getting this error as described below? I don't have that problem with solaris 8 that runs SMCossh 3.0.2p1 Thanks in advance. Louie # /usr/local/bin/ssh-keygen ld.so.1: /usr/local/bin/ssh-keygen: fatal: libcrypto.so.0.9.6: open failed: No such file or directory Killed #

Hello, I am experiencing some weird problems in a setup with tinc where communication between the 'server' and the 'clients' occur over 3g connections. Let me describe briefly the setup: - The server, on a public IP, runs tinc 1.0.8, in router mode, and the whole setup uses one VPN network. All client's VPN addresses are on the same subnet, and each client has a seperate