similar to: Can I pass 802.1q (VLAN tagged) through a VPN Tinc in HUB/Switch mode?.

Hey guys, I have a question regarding shorewall and vrf functionality. I have shorewall 3.4.8 and kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r8 I have tried to use iproute2 (ip route and ip rule) to establish multiple routing tables. The biggest problem seems to be, that I cannot add interfaces such as vlan interfaces to the routing table. My target is that linux takes attention of on which vlan interface

Hello all, I need a virtual firewall/router solution. I''m thinking of a netscreen 1000 but I want to know if it can be done in Linux. Here is my idea: 1 Linux box 2 GigE interfaces 1 interface setup with a public IP address ($PUBIP) 1 interface setup with 802.1q VLAN trunking with 100 vlans assigned ($VLAN1-$VLAN100) a /25 subnet routed to $PUBIP from my core routers All $VLAN

Hi All, I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration for your reference. Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1, 10.0.0.1) ?----------------? INTERNET ?-------------? COMPANY (Windows 7 PC,192.168.2.1, 10.0.0.2) ?------------? COMPANY (SERVER ZONE) ?----? SERVER A

Hello everybody. I could not find an answer to my problem in the archive. (But that may just be me :-) ) I have a problem with proxy arp and connection from loc (localnet) and from the firewall. Works fine from internet to dmz / proxy arp and vise versa. I have a feeling the solution is simple, but I''m no guru in Linux routing etc. The problem seems to be the routing setup. loc -

While using the linux bridge module in 2.6.10, the kernel seems to munge the source IP address of broadcast UDP packets if they come from "0.0.0.1", and sticks on an address of the linux host. I humbly submit that re-writing the source address of packets is not proper behavior for a bridge, even if those source addresses are not traditionally valid. Sure, 0.0.0.1 isn't a valid

Hi, I'm using linux 2.6.21.5 and our kernel is freeze. The problem is, if I create a Software bridge using $brctl command. and add two interfaces say, eth0.0 and eth0.1 using $brctl addbr br-lan $brctl addif br-lan eth0.0 $brctl addif br-lan eth0.1 and when i send traffic from a host connected to one port to host connected at other end, soon all the memory is dried up and and kernel

----- Original Message ---- > From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> > To: Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za> > Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Robert Backhaus <robbak@robbak.com> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:12:03 AM > Subject: Re: Packet corruption in re0 > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >

Hello, I am running Shorewall 2.0.2f, on SuSE 9.2 distro, kernel 2.6.8-24.11-default My ip addr show output is as follows: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0:

Hello, I have a problem with simple traffic shapping in shorewall, my current configuration is: zones vlan10 ipv4 # interfaces vlan10 vlan10 detect tcpflags,routeback shorewall.conf TC_ENABLED=Simple tcinterfaces vlan10 Internal 1mbit:50kb shorewall show tc Device vlan10: qdisc prio 5: root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Hi! I have 2 DC, now add one more DC, but all dcs dont view between they. New DC is "DC2" DC1 - vlan10 -> OK to DC3(Connectad by openvpn) DC1 -> vlan10 -> OK to DC2(vlan50) DC2-> vlan50 -> OK to DC1(vlan10) DC2-> Openvpn -> Dont "see" DC3 DC3 -> Openvpn -> OK to DC1(vlan10) DC3 -> Openvpn -> Dont "view" DC2(vlan50) All version

On Thursday, 7 April 2016, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 19:21, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 5:34:26 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Note that this is pretty much the last use case you cannot use > > >

Can you just compile the latest from the git repo on to raspian os? On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 11:21 AM Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> wrote: > El 29 de marzo de 2018 23:41:24 CEST, Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> > escribió: > >Hi everyone, > > > >I have installed Tinc-VPN v1.0.19-3, that is the last version that > >there is in Raspbian 7,

Hi all, I''m developing Q-in-Q VLAN feature for a router software. Does any open source tools have capacity of capturing and displaying Q-in-Q VLAN packet? Thanks & Regards, Hung ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Hi everyone, I have installed Tinc-VPN v1.0.19-3 that is the last, versión that there is in Raspbian 7, installed with the apt-get command. I will like know what will be the best way to migrate this version to Tinc-VPN v1.1 Regards, Ramses

Hi! Thanks for answer. But, i allowed all ports in my firewall... I tested, shutdown  my DC1 DC2 dont comunication with DC3 I create user in DC2, dont replication with DC3... I waited more in 20 minutes Why ?? Regards; On 17-05-2018 12:01, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 10:30 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have 2 DC, now add one more DC, but all dcs

Hello I use XEN 3.0 in debian sarge. I have a domU1 for routing and firewall. This domU1 use 2 network interfaces which is on a bridge ''gate'' and the other on bridge ''lan''. dumU2 use one interface (eth0) on bridge ''lan''. Then I make a ping out of domU2 to www.debian.de so I get no answer. The name isn''t resolved. A ping to IP of

Hi! I am looking to choose a condom based on its pleasure score. I received some summarised data from 10 individuals: structure(list(Ramses = c(4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 3, 4, 4, 3, 4), Sheiks = c(5, 5, 6, 4, 7, 6, 4, 5, 6, 3), Trojans = c(7, 8, 7, 9, 6, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3), Unnamed = c(2, 1, 1, 3, 3, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3)), .Names = c("Ramses", "Sheiks", "Trojans", "Unnamed"),

Hi! In Option "Inter-Site Transports", i have only  one the name "DEFAULTIPSITELINK" , in properties Sites in this link: Matriz Filial Matriz -> site with DC1 and DC2 Filail ->  site With DC3 Regards; On 17-05-2018 13:12, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:07 PM, Carlos wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for answer. >> >> But, i allowed

Hello Ramses, Am Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:21:52 +0200 schrieb Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com>: > Can tell me someone if there is any repository to Raspbian that has Tinc v1.1 > to update a installed Tinc v1.0 from command apt-get? thankfully the Debian package maintainer for tinc (Guus) prepared a package and uploaded it to the "experimental" suite:

Hi everybody and sorry by the insistence. Nobody has working Tinc Server over a Raspberry in an environment in production? Best regards and sorry again, Ramses De: Ramses II [mailto:ramses.sevilla at gmail.com] Enviado el: martes, 08 de octubre de 2013 17:59 Para: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Asunto: Tinc Server and Raspberry PI (Rev. B). Dear gentlemen, I need configure a VPN