similar to: Response time on Tinc VPNs, Bandwith on Tinc-VPN

I have clients, which connectin to Internet through vpn. I want to dynamically share bandwith between vpn connections, so if there few connections, then they get all bandwith, if more then they get their minimal guaranteed bandwith. my idea is: ip-up.local: tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2${1/ppp/} htb rate $[$RATEUP/$VPNS]kbit ceil ${RATEUP}kbps tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip

Hello, I am experiencing some weird problems in a setup with tinc where communication between the 'server' and the 'clients' occur over 3g connections. Let me describe briefly the setup: - The server, on a public IP, runs tinc 1.0.8, in router mode, and the whole setup uses one VPN network. All client's VPN addresses are on the same subnet, and each client has a seperate

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Hans de Groot wrote: > hosta  <--> hostb  <-->  hostc > > Hosta and hostc are not directly connected via tinc. But both are conncted > via hostb (I called my network tincnet). This works fine I can ssh from > hosta to hostc and vice versa without any problems. > > hostc is in a whitelisted iprange at some service

Guus, or anyone that will help ... Okay.. I've been running tinc for a few months now, and Its been working pretty well with my machine. Attempts to install it on others WinXP Pro, WinXP Home, and WinNT boxes have been spotty at best, with some installations working perfectly, and some not working at all. My latest issue is this. My windows 2000 machine can connect perfectly to our external

Hi there, I am using tinc since some monthes. I think the basic idea of extending vpn to a mesh of systems via tun/tap is great. And I think it is one of the useable developments compared to the much more complex vpn solutions I had used in the past. Great work. Setting up tinc I have fought with the configuration (and with the concepts) for a while as I have found no example that covers my

Hi I've compiled Tinc 1.0.2 from source but I'm having trouble. Not only am I having disconnections all the time (could be a network issue however) but even worse, Tinc is ignoring my MaxTimeout = 60 and is waiting longer and longer and longer (logfile shows it at 120 seconds). Is this a bug or have i misconfigured anything? best regards Marco Amrein Dec 5 11:25:12 frank

Hi, I'm having some trouble trying to run tinc over GNU httptunnel. On server A I have: /etc/tinc/netname/tinc-up: #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.3.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 /usr/bin/hts -F localhost:655 8888 /etc/tinc/netname/hosts/A: Address = foo.com Subnet = 10.3.0.0/24 TCPonly = yes /etc/tinc/netname/hosts/B: ConnectTo = A Subnet = 10.4.0.0/24 TCPonly = yes

If the concern is more about the reliability instead of throughput, should I add TCPonly = yes in the host configuration to make the VPN runs on TCP?

I agree with the in-effective of TCP transmission, but I wonder if the the UDP packet is dropped, the tinc VPN itself wouldn’t retransmit, and if the upper level application doesn’t handle the packet loss well, will this be the problem? Or the upper level application have very limited tolerance to packet loss(like RDP application, I guess if the packet loss go to certain threshold, the connection

Hi all, There's long time I'm having problems with a vpn... I'd be glad if somebody could check my current setup. Our problem is we're having tinc-vpn shortcuts while we have no bandwidth problem nither 'ssh' trouble. I attached some log lines from both the "server" and the "client". Some ASCII art... ___ ___ ___

Hi! Me and two friends are trying to get a VPN working, but we cant get routing between two tunnels. This is how it looks, all servers (192.168.*.1) are running IP Masquerade to enable the other computers behind them to access the internet. Both elayne and glenn are connecting to melc, and the tunnel between melc and glenn are running TCPOnly because that glenn doesnt have a public IP (it's

I am trying to run Mongrel 1.1.5 with mongrel_service 0.3.4 on Ruby 1.8.6 with a "normal" user account, i.e. a user which belongs only to the Windows group "Users". The rationale behind this is that running a web server with full administrative rights (e.g. Local System) is not something that I would like to do. Unfortunately, starting the service from the services control

using 1.0pre5 A: tinc.conf ------------ Name = A PrivateKeyFile = /usr/local/etc/tinc/vpn/rsa_key.priv Device = /dev/tap0 ConnectTo = B A: tinc-up --------- #!/bin/sh modprobe ethertap ifconfig tap0 hw ether fe:fd:00:00:00:00 ifconfig tap0 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.0.0 ifconfig tap0 -arp B: tinc.conf ------------ Name = B PrivateKeyFile = /usr/local/etc/tinc/vpn/rsa_key.priv Device =

Hi guys!! I've followed the windows 2000/xp tutorial and not only, but it seems not to work! I've for sure committed some errors... PC (under NAT) files: tinc/vpn/tinc.conf tinc/vpn/rsa_key.priv tinc/vpn/hosts/elegos tinc/vpn/hosts/shadowkrad tinc.conf: Name = elegos ConnectTo = shadowkrad TCPOnly = yes Interface = VPN (TCPOnly as under a NAT) rsa_key.priv: -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE

"PrivateKeyFile" as this is default, otherwise configuration is quite minimal. ======= Configuration ========= Server Side =========== # cat tinc.conf Name = fsvpns3f30 Mode = switch Device = /dev/net/tun AddressFamily = ipv4 PingInterval = 30 PrivateKeyFile = /etc/tinc/fsvpn/rsa_key.priv # cat tinc-up #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.10.100.30 netmask 255.255.0.0 # cat

Hi, I use shorewall on 2 computers and I''m really happy with it. But now I came over a special case where my wisdom ends. I have 2 VPNs running via FreeS/WAN on the firewall host, and now I want to replace my hand made setup with shorewall. I use the same FreeS/WAN setup as it is working already. I read through the documentation but there are only examples of 1 static net2net VPN and 3

I use 3 Ubuntu server 14.04 as KVM guest. Now I run 5 tinc vpns in switch mode. I use the same key for every vpn. Every kvm has connect to the two other servers. I need 5 vpns to have 5 networks connected but seperated. 1 vpn was running fine, but now that I run 5 vpns, my kvm crashes sometimes. Especially when I stop tinc. I used tinc 1.0.26 from repo. Now I tried tinc 1.1 pre, same problem but

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:03:48AM +0100, albi at life.de wrote: > 1 vpn was running fine, but now that I run 5 vpns, my kvm crashes sometimes. Especially when I stop tinc. > I used tinc 1.0.26 from repo. > Now I tried tinc 1.1 pre, same problem but less often. > > Any help or idea why system crashes? So the KVM instance itself crashes? Or Linux inside the VM? Any error messages

Hi, I configured 2 vpn's between 2 servers. When starting the tinc on each server. De 2 vpns's look like 1 vpn. Can tinc be configure for multiple vpn's between 2 hosts or more. Lets say there are 3 servers A, B and C. I want a tinc vpn between host A en host B. And a second vpn between host B en C without is becoming one vpn. And for example a third vpn between host A en host

Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks