similar to: Multiple VPN connections and routing problem

Hi, I have an existing fedora14 system with two interfaces and several virtual interfaces (as in eth0:0, etc). They are currently configured to not be controlled by NetworkManager, but just standard network services. I've recently started working with libvirtd, so I also have a virbr0 interface as well that has its own network and is masquerading the networking for the single KVM instance I

Hi, I have a fc14 box with two interfaces that I'm having some difficulty setting up a bridge properly. I have a few kvm guests set up and running, but I've switched from using NetworkManager to using standard networking with a bridge. I've modified the ifcfg-eth0 and created ifcfg-br0 as per the standard documentation, but I think I'm having routing problems. This is what the

Has anyone ran into this issue before? 2 physical nics: eth0 hooked up to 10.175.8.0/21 eth1 hooked up to 10.150.8.0/24 Ifconfig -a looks like this: [root@mgixen1 ~]# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:B9:F2:1B:C3 inet addr:10.175.8.158 Bcast:10.175.15.255 Mask:255.255.248.0 inet6 addr: fe80::219:b9ff:fef2:1bc3/64 Scope:Link UP

Hello! I'm trying to make a wireless mesh network with b.a.t.m.a.n. protocol, and I would like to secure the wireless links with tinc. My test network is 2 wireless routers with OpenWRT Kamikaze firmware, and the network topology is the following: |CLIENT|eth0: 192.168.180| <--> |eth0: 192.168.1.1|MESH-NODE|ath0: 192.168.5.54| <~~> |ath0: 192.168.5.51|GW|eth1: 192.168.1.51|

Dear list, >From an earlier post I got the impression that one could promote warnings from a glm to errors (presumably by putting options(warn=1)?), then try() would flag them as errors. I?ve spent half the day trying to do this, but no luck. Do you have an explicit solution? My problems is that I am trying to figure out during what conditions one may find 5 significant parameters in a

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. P1, P2 and P3 are three linux machines, and each has two network cards. P2 and P3 are connected in two ways: (1) directed connection between P2.eth0 and P3.eth0; (2) connection via P1. P1 acts as the gateway. TEQL is installed on P2 and P3 to load-balance packet transmission by round-robin sending packets

Hi Devik/Patrik, In setting up IMQ/HTB with a GRE Tunnel I''m constantly getting kernel errors: [root@linux /root]# dmesg ... ... ... NET: XXX messages suppressed. Dead loop on virtual device gre1, fix it urgently! ... ... ... This I get only if I''m going to start cross device b/w control. If I remove iptables rule iptables -t mangle -D POSTROUTING -j IMQ then no such warning

Hello. I need your help, DomU xen network diconnects randomly, how do you monitoring this? When I connect to vnc server in the hosts, DomU is running, then I open the DomU, after that guest network responds. DomU Debian 6.03 over Centos 5.7 and Xen 3.03. My network configuration: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 68:B5:99:78:AA:6D inet addr:192.168.5.230 Bcast:192.168.5.255

Hello all I am using open source xen v 3.0.4. When network-nat and vif-nat is activated in the config file, modified guests boot ok but hvm guests does not have network connection. Here is the config files: xend-config.sxp ------------------------------------- #(network-script network-bridge) #(vif-script vif-bridge) (network-script network-nat) (vif-script vif-nat)

Hi all, my dom0 is centos5.2 and domU paravirtualized is centos5.1 I can play sound on dom0 but not in domU (name: gasphar), moreover I use wifi as my inet connection and on installing domU cento5.1, I used virt-manager. I know that libvirtd made virbr0 and when changing to xenbr0, I cannot connect to internet but ssh to dom0 is fine! so how do I enable sound device on domU and changing to

Hey :) I have recently set up VPN links between 3 subnets. I can ping back and forth between all of the computers just fine, and samba works on all but one subnet. The problem is that I am unable to use the VPN to browse computers on the office network. I can browse them locally from the office, and I can browse other subnets from them (ie. at home, etc), but when I get on another subnet and try

Hi all, I some vlan routing problem, I''m using a linux box with an 8021q kernel. I have connect eth2 ethernet controller from linux box to a switch port that carry for vlan tagged as 2 3 4 5, I''m able to connect to the internet from vlan but not to route traffic between vlan, this is the output of ifconfig -a: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:50:E5:B2

I am having problem in ping or connect AP from Mobile Node(essid & channel is the same,maybe routing did not set properly but i fail to configure with route add default gw 192.168.3.4,its alway said network is unreachable ),My Mobile Node is using acx100 as driver while AP(redhat 9.0) is using HOSTAP 0.1.3.Any one can help? I heard How-To said we not need to set address on eth0 & wlan0

Hello, I am facing the problem that samba does not recognize my network interfaces: Jun 29 12:21:59 ebox nmbd[22377]: [2007/06/29 12:21:59, 0] lib/interface.c:load_interfaces(225) Jun 29 12:21:59 ebox nmbd[22377]: WARNING: no network interfaces found Jun 29 12:21:59 ebox nmbd[22377]: [2007/06/29 12:21:59, 0] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:create_subnets(190) Jun 29 12:21:59 ebox nmbd[22377]:

Gents, first of all thanks for tinc, and thanks in advance for your advice. At the risk of revealing my stupidity and opening myself to ridicule.... I am trying to connect a new remote lan into an existing tinc vpn with the central tinc vpn server located at 10.57.132.1 on the 10.57.132.0/24 subnet. I set up this central tinc vpn server myself along with several other remote lans linked to

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. My problem is: When I ping to P3.teql0 from P2 ("[P2]# ping 16.119.144.66"), the traffic can never go from P2.eth1, and all traffic only goes to P1.eth0. What P2.eth1 (16.119.144.33) did is broadcasting an ARP asking for the MAC address of 16.119.144.66, although I have specified the route to

Hello Tinc list! I'm trying to set up a Tinc VPN between two KVM host machines so that a VM on one host can communicate with a VM on the other host. While I do have a good bit of experience with virtualization, I'm not a particularly savvy network guy, so this is proving to be a pretty big challenge. Requirements: * ALL VM network traffic must be secure. * VMs on one host must be

Hello, I have been reading through the documentation and trying to set up a very small VPN as a test for a larger rollout that I would like to complete in the future but cannot get this working. The configuration seems like it should be relatively simple, so I'm most likely missing something basic but I just cannot see what I'm doing wrong. At the moment I am trying to get this working

what am I doing wrong? SERVER: cat tinc.conf Device=/dev/net/tun Mode=switch Name=server PrivateKeyFile=/etc/tinc/vpn/rsa_key.priv cat tinc-up #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.170.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 route add -host 192.170.1.2 dev $INTERFACE route add -net 192.170.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 dev $INTERFACE cat hosts/server Compression=9 Subnet=192.170.1.1/32 Address=192.169.1.1

Hi, I have being try to connect a virtual machine to the outside through a bridge on the host. The following shows that I have a bridge. And I'm able to start a guest. pengy@rigel:~$ brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.c81f66e29049 no em4 br1 8000.c81f66e29045 no bond0 virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes