similar to: RESTART ---Help with routing between Windows

Hello, I am having an issue with getting tinc to route the packets between 2 Windows tinc installations. Here is what I have so far: homeClient: Physical Interface: 192.168.6.50 gateway 192.168.6.102 homeClient: Tap-Win32 192.168.10.23 no gateway homeClient file: Address:192.168.6.50 Subnet=192.168.10.0/24 vpnoffice: Physical Interface 192.168.6.102 gateway 192.168.6.1 vpnoffice: Tap-Win32

Well this has had me stumped for days now. For months I've been using tinc in TCPOnly because I always received the unknown host error when using UDP. On Monday, i set the flag IndirectData = yes in my host files, and removed the TCPOnly line. Initially, everything worked great. My throughput increased from 600KB/sec to 2MB/sec between the sites. However, I also did some testing with

Hello, I just tried tinc for win the first time. I use tinc on linux computer for some time already. Now I get the following error: Dec 18 14:57:39 narnia tinc.life[10884]: Connection from 217.187.51.119 port 35059 Dec 18 14:57:39 narnia tinc.life[10884]: Connection with mwflapar1 (217.187.51.119 port 35059) activated Dec 18 14:57:44 narnia tinc.life[10884]: Received UDP packet from unknown

Well i currently try to set up tinc between two hosts, one with normal dsl connection one behind some kind of unknown firewall (Note since OpenVp is able to connect when the normal one is the Server I guess tinc should be able, too) start.bat-------------------------------tincd -n Empire-Network -D -d4 --bypass-security (Bypass is only currently because tis not working yet)

Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks

Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks

Hi, I've successfully running tinc1.0pre4 between two locations on SuSE Linux 7.1 in a special masquerading Firewall environment, so that I'm using the TCPonly keyword in the host files to get a connection. Otherwise I would get the message 'Received UDP packet on port 655 from unknown source <ipaddress in hex:port>'. After upgrading to 1.0pre5 I'm getting this message

Hi Guus, Am Freitag, den 25.09.2015, 09:36 +0200 schrieb Guus Sliepen: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:41:06AM +0200, Marcus Schopen wrote: > > > I'm running some tinc clients behind a NAT (masquerading, Cisco Router) > > connecting to a host outside on a public IP in a different network. The > > tunnels get unstable every few minutes and I see packet loss when > >

Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes

Dear I am testing tinc on Windows and found some interesting behavior. I used "TCPOnly" parameter for both end because I wanted to go through NAT. However, by using TCPOnly parameter, the response of PING slowed down significantly. The PING response with UDP is about 4ms, but it bumped up to 2000ms with TCP. I am just curious whether this is caused by using TCP. Regards Masateru

Hi: I'm having some trouble connecting to the tinc VPN I've setup for my client. Basically I would like to connect to the LAN of my client (as I'm currently thousands of miles away and won't be back for a month and a half) to continue with the development of an in-house ERP. I've setup the router (a Linksys router running the stock firmware) to forward both TCP and UDP

Hi guys!! I've followed the windows 2000/xp tutorial and not only, but it seems not to work! I've for sure committed some errors... PC (under NAT) files: tinc/vpn/tinc.conf tinc/vpn/rsa_key.priv tinc/vpn/hosts/elegos tinc/vpn/hosts/shadowkrad tinc.conf: Name = elegos ConnectTo = shadowkrad TCPOnly = yes Interface = VPN (TCPOnly as under a NAT) rsa_key.priv: -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE

Hello, response time: how is it possible to increase the response time on Tinc VPNs. When I use tinc over a fast or giga-bit network connection the ping-response time is normally about 1800 to 2000 ms. Sometimes I get ping response times at about 2.500 to 3.000 ms over a normal Ethernet Connection or a television-cable connection within the same providers-network in the same city. The ping-time

If the concern is more about the reliability instead of throughput, should I add TCPonly = yes in the host configuration to make the VPN runs on TCP?

Hi, I'm having some trouble trying to run tinc over GNU httptunnel. On server A I have: /etc/tinc/netname/tinc-up: #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.3.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 /usr/bin/hts -F localhost:655 8888 /etc/tinc/netname/hosts/A: Address = foo.com Subnet = 10.3.0.0/24 TCPonly = yes /etc/tinc/netname/hosts/B: ConnectTo = A Subnet = 10.4.0.0/24 TCPonly = yes

Hi, I'm running some tinc clients behind a NAT (masquerading, Cisco Router) connecting to a host outside on a public IP in a different network. The tunnels get unstable every few minutes and I see packet loss when pinging the clients on their internal tunnel IPs from the host side. Before putting the tinc clients behind the NAT they were running on public IPs too (clients and host in

Guus, or anyone that will help ... Okay.. I've been running tinc for a few months now, and Its been working pretty well with my machine. Attempts to install it on others WinXP Pro, WinXP Home, and WinNT boxes have been spotty at best, with some installations working perfectly, and some not working at all. My latest issue is this. My windows 2000 machine can connect perfectly to our external

I'm stuck behind a corporate NAT that I obviously have absolutely no control over. The nice thing is that the firewall rules, AFAIK, are very nice. I've had tinc running before from behind nazi firewalls with no NAT. Been fiddling with tinc for many hours, but have been SOL. The local machine is the client (has ConnectTo in the conf), and remote is the server (has Listen in the conf).

Hi, I've an up and running tinc vpn between my laptop and my office computer (on which I've root access if needs be). From where I'm sitting right now, UDP packets are dropped. TcpOnly has solved the problem for the tinc part and I can still connect to my office. I'd like to access some important <cough>irc</cough> UDP-only services. Do I have a

Hi there, we are using tinc in switched mode for over a year now, currently with 18 clients which are connected 24 hours a day and many which aren't connected the whole day, also. If i'm reading the changes from 1.0.9 to 1.0.10 and 1.0.11 correctly, tinc should work now, although "TCPOnly = yes" isn't set in the config files of clients which are behind a NAT firewall, e.g. a