similar to: Connection problems ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Connection problems ?"

2009 Jan 06
0
No subject
Don't know what impact is on tinc operation? Laptop extract (3G): .. Connected to MainPC (41.242.172.108 port 655) .. Sending ID to MainPC (41.242.172.108 port 655): 0 Laptop 17 .. Got ID from MainPC (41.242.172.108 port 655): 0 MainPC 17 .. Sending CHALLENGE to MainPC (41.242.172.108 port 655): ... .. Bogus data received from MainPC (41.242.172.108 port 655) .. Closing connection with
2010 Nov 28
4
TCPOnly is required since 1.0.13?
Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes
2006 Dec 04
4
20 kb/s as max with TCPonly
Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks
2006 Dec 04
4
20 kb/s as max with TCPonly
Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks
2015 Sep 25
2
Tinc clients behind a NAT, tunnels get unstable
Hi Guus, Am Freitag, den 25.09.2015, 09:36 +0200 schrieb Guus Sliepen: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:41:06AM +0200, Marcus Schopen wrote: > > > I'm running some tinc clients behind a NAT (masquerading, Cisco Router) > > connecting to a host outside on a public IP in a different network. The > > tunnels get unstable every few minutes and I see packet loss when > >
2015 Sep 25
2
Tinc clients behind a NAT, tunnels get unstable
Hi, I'm running some tinc clients behind a NAT (masquerading, Cisco Router) connecting to a host outside on a public IP in a different network. The tunnels get unstable every few minutes and I see packet loss when pinging the clients on their internal tunnel IPs from the host side. Before putting the tinc clients behind the NAT they were running on public IPs too (clients and host in
2009 Aug 22
7
Address family not supported
Hi everyone, I'm setting up a VPN over IPv6, attempting to build an IPv4-over-IPv6 tunnel, but when I try to connect to the server, I got this: System call `getaddrinfo' failed: Address family not supported. Client runs WindowsXP, and I did almost exactly the same as http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/windows-install . Here is the configuration files: ------- tinc.conf ------- Name =
2018 Apr 10
2
Route certain trafic via a tinc node that is not directly connected.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Hans de Groot wrote: > hosta  <--> hostb  <-->  hostc > > Hosta and hostc are not directly connected via tinc. But both are conncted > via hostb (I called my network tincnet). This works fine I can ssh from > hosta to hostc and vice versa without any problems. > > hostc is in a whitelisted iprange at some service
2010 Jan 26
1
TCP throughput?
Dear I am testing tinc on Windows and found some interesting behavior. I used "TCPOnly" parameter for both end because I wanted to go through NAT. However, by using TCPOnly parameter, the response of PING slowed down significantly. The PING response with UDP is about 4ms, but it bumped up to 2000ms with TCP. I am just curious whether this is caused by using TCP. Regards Masateru
2009 Mar 06
2
Problems with UDP frame size??
Well this has had me stumped for days now. For months I've been using tinc in TCPOnly because I always received the unknown host error when using UDP. On Monday, i set the flag IndirectData = yes in my host files, and removed the TCPOnly line. Initially, everything worked great. My throughput increased from 600KB/sec to 2MB/sec between the sites. However, I also did some testing with
2003 Sep 06
2
What is wrong? "Creating metasocket failed"
Hi there, I'm trying to set tinc and I get the following messages: Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: tincd 1.0.1 (Aug 14 2003 15:09:44) starting, debug level 0 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: Script tinc-up exited with non-zero status 126 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]:
2009 Sep 14
3
Problem making connection can anyone help me?
Well i currently try to set up tinc between two hosts, one with normal dsl connection one behind some kind of unknown firewall (Note since OpenVp is able to connect when the normal one is the Server I guess tinc should be able, too) start.bat-------------------------------tincd -n Empire-Network -D -d4 --bypass-security (Bypass is only currently because tis not working yet)
2009 Dec 16
2
Response time on Tinc VPNs, Bandwith on Tinc-VPN
Hello, response time: how is it possible to increase the response time on Tinc VPNs. When I use tinc over a fast or giga-bit network connection the ping-response time is normally about 1800 to 2000 ms. Sometimes I get ping response times at about 2.500 to 3.000 ms over a normal Ethernet Connection or a television-cable connection within the same providers-network in the same city. The ping-time
2001 May 24
1
tinc from behind a NAT
I'm stuck behind a corporate NAT that I obviously have absolutely no control over. The nice thing is that the firewall rules, AFAIK, are very nice. I've had tinc running before from behind nazi firewalls with no NAT. Been fiddling with tinc for many hours, but have been SOL. The local machine is the client (has ConnectTo in the conf), and remote is the server (has Listen in the conf).
2003 Sep 14
3
Trivial setup question
Hello. I apologize in advance for my question -- it's seemingly trivial, but I've spent countless hours on its solution to no avail. Basically, I have two tinc servers: Home: Ethernet adapter LAN: IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1 Ethernet adapter
2009 Oct 11
1
Routing through vpn
Hi, I've an up and running tinc vpn between my laptop and my office computer (on which I've root access if needs be). From where I'm sitting right now, UDP packets are dropped. TcpOnly has solved the problem for the tinc part and I can still connect to my office. I'd like to access some important <cough>irc</cough> UDP-only services. Do I have a
2010 Dec 16
3
tinc node behind nat router.
I have some tinc nodes behind a nat router. Which ipaddress should i use in de host file for the tinc nodes behind a nat router. The internet ipaddress or the private ipaddress ? Perry
2009 Nov 16
2
tcp-only still needed?
Hi there, we are using tinc in switched mode for over a year now, currently with 18 clients which are connected 24 hours a day and many which aren't connected the whole day, also. If i'm reading the changes from 1.0.9 to 1.0.10 and 1.0.11 correctly, tinc should work now, although "TCPOnly = yes" isn't set in the config files of clients which are behind a NAT firewall, e.g. a
2004 Mar 12
1
Tinc over httptunnel
Hi, I'm having some trouble trying to run tinc over GNU httptunnel. On server A I have: /etc/tinc/netname/tinc-up: #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.3.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 /usr/bin/hts -F localhost:655 8888 /etc/tinc/netname/hosts/A: Address = foo.com Subnet = 10.3.0.0/24 TCPonly = yes /etc/tinc/netname/hosts/B: ConnectTo = A Subnet = 10.4.0.0/24 TCPonly = yes
2006 Apr 22
1
Setup tinc for "Road warrior"?
Hi: I'm having some trouble connecting to the tinc VPN I've setup for my client. Basically I would like to connect to the LAN of my client (as I'm currently thousands of miles away and won't be back for a month and a half) to continue with the development of an in-house ERP. I've setup the router (a Linksys router running the stock firmware) to forward both TCP and UDP