similar to: tinc and wireless mesh

I'm really trying to do a client to server connection more than an ethernet bridge, but I couldn't figure out from the docs where that comes in. Client is Kubuntu Breezy, and server is Debian Sarge. Tinc was installed with apt-get on both systems. Version on server is 1.0.3, on client is 1.0.4. I've spent the entire day toiling over getting this set up. I had ipchains rules, etc,

Hello! I've a problem with tinc-up on Debian Woody (tinc 1.0pre7): router:/etc/tinc/vpn# /etc/init.d/tinc start Starting tinc daemons: vpn. router:/etc/tinc/vpn# tail /var/log/syslog Aug 23 03:25:26 router tinc.vpn[503]: /dev/tap0 is a Linux ethertap device Aug 23 03:25:26 router modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module tap0 Aug 23 03:25:27 router last message repeated 4 times Aug 23

Hi all, my dom0 is centos5.2 and domU paravirtualized is centos5.1 I can play sound on dom0 but not in domU (name: gasphar), moreover I use wifi as my inet connection and on installing domU cento5.1, I used virt-manager. I know that libvirtd made virbr0 and when changing to xenbr0, I cannot connect to internet but ssh to dom0 is fine! so how do I enable sound device on domU and changing to

Hi Sam, do you know if there is anything done about cbb(4)? I have many wireless adapters with ath(4), but only the one based on PCMCIA is making problems on FreeBSD. I cannot boot my notebook with the device inserted into the port, or it will render the system unusable (100% load on cbb(4)). And all I can see is the following: Jul 12 14:58:39 link kernel: ath0: ath_chan_set: unable to reset

I''m trying to follow Chapter 10 of the howto and apply it to two ubuntu machines each with two 802.11b/g interfaces. However, I cannot get a connection. I would like the 4 interfaces to create 2 ad hoc links on separate channels. I have set this up successfully with the following: /etc/dbus-1/event.d/25NetworkManager stop wlanconfig ath0 destroy wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0

Hi. I have problem in following scenario: 3 routers A, B, C: router A: eth0--> DSL ( public IP ) eth1 --> 192.168.0.1 ( local network ) routing table A: 83.x.x.x/29 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 83.x.x.x 192.168.5.0/24 via 192.168.0.8 dev eth1 192.168.4.0/24 via 192.168.0.8 dev eth1 192.168.3.0/24 via 192.168.0.8 dev eth1 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.0.8 dev eth1 192.168.1.0/24

Hi, after some time without FreeBSD I installed 7.1 on an IBM Thinkpad T30 (with ZFS root on encrypted geli, works great). Config is: FreeBSD hasking.alashan.nongo 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #3: Thu Feb 5 21:10:45 CET 2009 root@hasking.alashan.nongo:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HASKING i386 I tried using my ath based D-Link DWL G650, which still seems to have some issues in regard to interrupt

I am doing some testing of openwrt'd wireless access points, using madwifi-ng'd atheros radios. In the test configuration, I have three devices in a triangle, each has wds links to the other two devices. The ath0 interface is in ap mode, ath1 is a wds link to one device, and ath2 is a wds link to the other device. All three interfaces (and an ethernet interface) are in a bridge (br-lan)

Hi, I am using netem to add loss and then adding another qdisc within netem according to the wiki. Then i want to change the netem drop probability without having to delete the qdisc and recreate it. I try it but I get invalid argument: thorium-ini hedpe # tc qdisc add dev ath0 root handle 1:0 netem drop 1% thorium-ini hedpe # tc qdisc add dev ath0 parent 1:1 handle 10: xcp capacity 54Mbit

Hello Sam, I've got a Fujitsu Siemens Amilo Pro V3515 laptop, with a builtin autheros-wifi card, but I can't get it working. I am running FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE, I don't know whether it works in -CURRENT. Over here I have the dmesg: http://junk.quis.cx/VNViVksv/blackbox.dmesg.txt I haven't compiled it in, it didn't boot that way (kernel panic iirc). When I kldload if_ath I get

this is what happens when I try to run tincd root at OpenWrt:/etc/tinc/vpn# tincd -n vpn -D -d5 tincd 1.0.21 (Mar 9 2014 18:26:59) starting, debug level 5 Could not open /dev/net/tun: No such file or directory Terminating root at OpenWrt:/etc/tinc/vpn# cat tinc.conf Name = vpn_gw1 Interface = tun0 ConnectTo = vpn_gw2 Cipher = aes-256-cbc Digest = SHA512 Regards Yazeed Fataar

Forget about tinc. I won't work until you solve issue with your kernel. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com> wrote: > this is what happens when I try to run tincd > > root at OpenWrt:/etc/tinc/vpn# tincd -n vpn -D -d5 > > tincd 1.0.21 (Mar 9 2014 18:26:59) starting, debug level 5 > > Could not open /dev/net/tun: No such file

Hi everyone. I'm wondering whether a setup like the one described below would be possible with Tinc: nodeA1 nodeB3 | | (Network A) --- [GWA] --- (Internet) --- [GWB] --- (Network B) | | nodeA2

Hello, I tried to plot some 3d-plots with the 'mesh' function, but I allways get the message 'Fehler: konnte Funktion "mash" nicht finden' in english this means 'error: can't find the function "mesh"'. Do I need another package? I didn't found anything in the web this afternoon, only descriptions how to use the function. I looked up a lot of

NetworkManager used to work fine for me but during the last few installations its a big hurdle in the wireless connectivity. I'm using Madwifi and its interface is correctly listed and working but I cannot connect to any wifi AP without NetworkManager. I've two interfaces: eth0 and wifi0. Starting NetworkManager doesn't show any notification icon in the top right in gnome and I believe

I apologize for the TLDR-style email, but I wanted to demonstrate that I have done a lot of work (11 hours and at least 8 tutorials including the tinc docs) before asking for help. My basic problem is this: tinc appears to properly connect and authenticate the client to the server, but I cannot ping or access resources. (yes. I know there is no 'server' in tinc, but 'server'

Hello everyone, We are working on HTB with TC and would like some clarifications from your part. Our example is as follows. We have one HTB root class and two HTB classes attached to it, as in this figure : 1: HTB | | |

tinc uses direct UDP communication for performance, not reliability. If you want to establish more metaconnections for increased reliability, you can use AutoConnect (though it probably won't work across NATs). A better solution is to use two central nodes (instead of one) for redundancy. On 11 June 2015 at 18:59, Daniel J. Grinkevich <danielgrinkevich at gmail.com> wrote: > If we

I am using the madwifi driver with the patch to allow changing of the MAC address and I have two other ethernet interfaces plus a pppoe interface. My outbound connection is ppp0. I have ath0, eth1, eth2 for internal interfaces. I have added these three interfaces to br0. Once the traffic leaves the linux router, it gets NAT'd and goes out through ppp0. All traffic on all segments works

Hi. I read that one feature of tink vpn solution is the Automatic Full Mesh Routing support that is defined as: "regardless of how you set up the tinc daemons to connect to each other, VPN traffic is always (if possible) sent directly to the destination, without going through intermediate" hops. What this means? I don't understand how this work. Can you please give me some