similar to: IPv6 setup for tinc

1. The UDT library is a BSD-licensed accelerated UDP-based transport. Would tinc be able to use this for UDP-based connections and would the licensing be acceptable? http://udt.sourceforge.net/index.html 2. I would like to see a 3rd compression protocol added to tinc: one based on the Mahoney compression schemes would be worth investigating (need something fast and uses small RAM on

Ah, very good then. There does seem to be some changes in zip compression behavior with the new lib & a build of OptiPNG I use, so I'm curious how it'd affect tinc traffic on compressed links. Then again I use LZO on my links, so I don't expect to see any changes for myself. -----Original Message----- From: tinc-devel-request at tinc-vpn.org To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org

I was looking up zlib files for another project, and noticed zlib was updated significantly this Spring, particularly in March & April of 2010. Any plans to recompile tinc to use it? http://www.zlib.net/ The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not

Sorry for the delayed response: been a busy weekend. SCTP looks very promising, and would make a hopefully stable mesh: I agree with your assessment in that regard vs optimized UDP setups. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCTP As for my request for improved compression, the "zpipe" implementation looks promising, as it is a high-level streaming compressor. I know most of the developers

1. Compress should be in your hosts file, not your config file. 2. Since its a low-end CPU on the router, try using Compression=10 or 11 (fast/best lzo); I use 9 (max zlib) on my ASUS OpenWRT routers & ClearOS boxes. 3. If you're using Backfire OpenWRT, you should be able to use the version of tinc compiled in trunk http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ On 9/20/2010 5:22 PM,

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:38:24AM -0400, Michael Adams wrote: > I've tried joining the tinc mailing lists to no avail. I wanted to make the > following posting... You need to subscribe to the mailing list before you can post to it. If you have a problem subscribing, please let me know what went wrong. > Greetings to all from Florida. My name's Mike Adams, and I've been

Hi Michael, when I was looking for information on tinc in combination with IPv6, I also found your new tutorial at that time (earlier this month). Somehow a couple of things are less clear to me in the newer tutorial (maybe the nice network topology image is missing). OK, you added the unique local addresses to the setup. But I dont't get it how the routing is done in your setup. You

For tinc users on OpenWRT: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/29137 ciao :) Saverio

Hiya everyone. I am currently evaluating tinc for use by my company's vpn needs and I would like some help/information about configuration of tinc and if it will do what I would like it to do. Hopefully some kind soul will help me with what I am trying to achieve. I am sorry if this is an inappropriate forum for this question but I am looking for people with some ideas on networking generally

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:41:12PM +0000, Håvard Rabbe wrote: > Im using tinc to bridge networks together. And im using ebtables to block dhcp traffic for ipv4 on each node in tinc. One of my nodes have recently began using ipv6. The isp is using auto configuration to give out ipv6 addresses. The problem is that every computer in my bridged network is getting ipv6 addresses from that node.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using tinc to connect a couple of ipv6 capable machines using a mix of upd6, udp4, tcp6 and tcp4. Now I wanted to add an linux embedded device, which has no ipv6 support at all. Tinc did compile and configuration is fine (tested on other machine), but after connecting the embedded device to other hosts tinc instances, it suddenly crashes.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:51:49PM +0000, Håvard Rabbe wrote: > thank you for looking in to this. I haven't tried it before now. I cant get it to work. > > after running the commands you suggest I get this when I run ip6tables --list-rules > > root at JOTVPN:~# ip6tables --list-rules > -P INPUT ACCEPT > -P FORWARD ACCEPT > -P OUTPUT ACCEPT > -A FORWARD -i vpn -p

Hi everybody. I added two Address values to a host file, one for a ipv6 address en one for a ipv4 address. ci1143800182:Address = 2001:xxx:xxxx:xxx:99b5:d0aa:27b3:d158 ci1143800182:Address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx The documentation says : *Address = <**IP address**|**hostname**> [<port>] [recommended]* *This variable is only required if you want to connect to this host. It must

Hi Im using tinc to bridge networks together. And im using ebtables to block dhcp traffic for ipv4 on each node in tinc. One of my nodes have recently began using ipv6. The isp is using auto configuration to give out ipv6 addresses. The problem is that every computer in my bridged network is getting ipv6 addresses from that node. The other computers behind the other nodes have no use for ipv6

hi It was not working when i applied the rules on the vpn card. But I wondered if maybe bridging of vpn and eth0 was messing this up. I thought it was enough to only apply it to the vpn card root at JOTVPN:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled    interfaces bridge 8000.000c29638a7e no           eth0                                                                   vpn so I tried the

Hi, At my provider (xs4all) I've got an ipv6 tunnel working. Now I would like to distribute ipv6 via the tinc tunnel. My tinc.conf: ------------ Name=server AddressFamily=ipv4 Device=/dev/net/tun PrivateKeyFile=/etc/tinc/fvhglobalnet/rsa_key.priv GraphDumpFile=|/usr/bin/dot -Tpng -o /var/www/htdocs.keetweej.vanheusden.com/stats/tinc-fvh-network-graph.png Mode=switch KeyExpire=299

Hi thank you for looking in to this. I haven't tried it before now. I cant get it to work. after running the commands you suggest I get this when I run ip6tables --list-rules root at JOTVPN:~# ip6tables --list-rules -P INPUT ACCEPT -P FORWARD ACCEPT -P OUTPUT ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i vpn -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 133 -j DROP -A FORWARD -o vpn -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 134 -j

Hello folks, we're planning an IPv6-Deployment using tinc. A routed tinc-network should connect a couple of wireless access points. In order to avoiding scaling issues, the network should not be run in switched mode. Our site uses 2001:470:780f::/56 - Each ap gets a single /64 network, to be distributed to its wireless clients. Example: ap 1: 2001:470:780f:1::/64 ap 2:

Hello! I rent a virtual private server and use Shorewall on it. Now I have the option of enabling IPv6 for it and am investigating application compatibility. I''ve noticed the following FAQ entry: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq80a As far as I can tell, the host system is RHEL-5 (5.5, I presume) using kernel 2.6.18-028stab070.14. The hoster does not know about any issues with

Thanks for the reply Guss, So in my case the Amazon VPS server is behind a FULL CONE NAT(static NAT), so is that enough to hole punch other nodes. what all ports will should be opened up on the NAT device? Most of the other nodes are behind cg-nat, so I wont have any control over its nat. Thank you, Regards, Bobby Thomas. On Oct 19, 2015 1:45 AM, "Guus Sliepen" <guus at