similar to: Problem running Tinc

hi there, I''m not sure if it is better to use the ml or the forum so I ended to post on both ... I''m trying to login into a page that is using javascript to set a cookie: <script language="JavaScript"> {text "\n" " \n" " \n" " document.cookie = ''vhp_js=v995105608h85339294p;path=/;domain=.venere.com;expire=0'';

Hi everyone, since its upgrade yesterday, my laptop and desktop computers only see a small portion of the files (about 500 of 2000) in one of the samba shares on my samba server. They both miss the same files. There's no apparent system in what's missing, not date or alphabetic order or size anyway. The technical details: Laptop runs Ubuntu Breezy, smbclient 3.0.14a-ubuntu,

Here https://www.tinc-vpn.org/documentation/Example-configuration.html#Example-configuration you have: For Branch A BranchA would be configured like this: In /etc/tinc/company/tinc-up: # Real interface of internal network: # ifconfig eth0 10.1.54.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.1.54.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 Is netmask 255.255.0.0 or 255.0.0.0 ? Thank you!

dobey.pwns at gmail.com Hi Rodney, (his mailadress exist no more why i have now sent it to the Mailinglist freedesktop at lists.freedesktop.org <mailto:freedesktop at lists.freedesktop.org> Hi Peoples, could you check out my Iconthemes, specially in /devices/ and in /places/ i have make extra icons for drives, drives-network and folder-network and so on, you see it if you analysing it,

I apologize for the TLDR-style email, but I wanted to demonstrate that I have done a lot of work (11 hours and at least 8 tutorials including the tinc docs) before asking for help. My basic problem is this: tinc appears to properly connect and authenticate the client to the server, but I cannot ping or access resources. (yes. I know there is no 'server' in tinc, but 'server'

Hello, I am having an issue with getting tinc to route the packets between 2 Windows tinc installations. Here is what I have so far: homeClient: Physical Interface: 192.168.6.50 gateway 192.168.6.102 homeClient: Tap-Win32 192.168.10.23 no gateway homeClient file: Address:192.168.6.50 Subnet=192.168.10.0/24 vpnoffice: Physical Interface 192.168.6.102 gateway 192.168.6.1 vpnoffice: Tap-Win32

Hi all, I've a little problem using ntlm_auth with squid. Scenario: Redhat 9, Samba 3 compiled, squid-2.5 compiled. smb.conf: [global] encrypt passwords = Yes winbind separator = \ winbind cache time = 10 template homedir = /home/%D/%U template shell = /bin/bash idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 winbind enum users = yes

Hi folks, First of all, i'm sorry for sending another question about windows 95 and samba. But i can't find any information about my questions, and i though that you guys can at least poit me to the right direction. If someone can help me, this is my problem: I have a network with 50 win95 clients, one AIX 4.1 acting as a samba server, and one Solaris 2.5.1 with NIS, authenticating user

I read tinc documentation part: " For Branch A BranchA would be configured like this: In /etc/tinc/company/tinc-up: # Real interface of internal network: # ifconfig eth0 10.1.54.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.1.54.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 ... Note that the IP addresses of eth0 and tap0 are the same. This is quite possible, if you make sure that the netmasks of the

Hi, I want to implement a small network using Win 2k and Samba... I only want to create a Windows 'workgroup' and to use user level security with plaintext passwords... Just trying to keep things very simple.... I have implemented Samba 2.2.4 on Slackware Linux 7.1 .... Using a minimal smb.conf: [global] workgroup = bentley netbios name = blackie server string = This is Linux/Samba

I get the following: wine start Olympus/setup.exe fixme:exec:SHELL_execute flags ignored: 0x00000100 jwl at blackie:~$ err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x7bc9fc44 "loader.c: loader_section" wait timed out in thread 001f, blocked by 001e, retrying (60 sec) err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code c0000194 flags 0 addr 0x7bc3549f When it starts up I see a small window

Tim Evans wrote: > I have an original-label Infrant (now NetGear) ReadyNAS storage > appliance that's been running for 8+ years. Except for replacing its > power supply, it has not skipped a beat in all this time. > > I use it primarily as a backup device (via NFS) for a couple of Linux > machines, (via SMB) for a couple of Windows PC's, and (via ftp) for web > sites

On 11/18/2015 11:50 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > What size storage are you looking at, and what's your budget? Are we > talking a 4TB drive, or 33TB, or...? Sorry, should've mentioned this is for home/home office. The ReadyNAS is a four-bay unit, with 500GB disks. Will want a four-bay, probably with 1- or 2-TB disks. -- Tim Evans | 5 Chestnut Court UNIX System Admin

On 11/18/2015 07:31 AM, Tim Evans wrote: > Would like to hear recommendations here. https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/

We're using Synology boxes with good results so far. They're built on Linux with ssh access and good support for things like rsync. They have options to backup to remote servers including Amazon too. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, Tim Evans wrote: > I have an original-label Infrant (now NetGear) ReadyNAS storage > appliance that's been running for 8+ years. Except for replacing its

Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: > - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made in Silicon Valley). We bought an iXsystems TrueNAS (commercial version of FreeNAS +

On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: > It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid? no, RAID is purely availability when faced with single or double drive failure, nothing else. classic raid is most certainly NOT about data integrity, as

Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:01 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: >>> It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to >>> buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. >>> Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid?

--On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 10:31:36 AM -0500 Tim Evans <tkevans at tkevans.com> wrote: > Would like to hear recommendations here. Besides the ReadyNAS, I have > worked with a Thecus NAS (don't recall model). What are the features I > should look at? For reasons that others have already touched on, I like FreeNAS, as long as you're using the base system. I have

On 11/18/2015 04:42 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > the /really/ hard one when rolling your own highly redundant systems > with high data integrity needed for things like transactional database > servers, is implementing redundant storage controllers with shared > writeback cache... you pretty much have to get into EMC class > hardware for this level of reliability with data