similar to: vpn over http tunnel

Hi, I'm having some trouble trying to run tinc over GNU httptunnel. On server A I have: /etc/tinc/netname/tinc-up: #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.3.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 /usr/bin/hts -F localhost:655 8888 /etc/tinc/netname/hosts/A: Address = foo.com Subnet = 10.3.0.0/24 TCPonly = yes /etc/tinc/netname/hosts/B: ConnectTo = A Subnet = 10.4.0.0/24 TCPonly = yes

Hi, I had some performance problems with TINC running on Windows XP. I had a VPN tunnel running over a wireless network to a Linux VPN server. Web browsing through the tunnel was a pain. Big web pages with lots of pictures loaded very slow compared to a plain network connection. When the VPN client was running on a Linux computer, and a Windows computer was browsing the web through the VPN

Hi there, I'm trying to set tinc and I get the following messages: Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: tincd 1.0.1 (Aug 14 2003 15:09:44) starting, debug level 0 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: Script tinc-up exited with non-zero status 126 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]:

Hey, Tinc developers! I'm not sure if anyone else has brought this up, but we've got a rather good reason for using TCP, even though UDP will actually form a working connection. Anyone on Comcast's "small business" service is forced to use an SMC cable modem/router. Its NAT implementation is capable of letting tinc's UDP tunnels work fine, but they limit a single UDP

Hi, I have application, where I am reciving the RTP packets, which has OPUS payload. >From the RTP packets I got following information: (12 byes Header) tells about the version, payload time, time stamp, srsc, etc. The rest of the packet is OPUS payload (raw format), The TOC byte from OPUS payload tells its 20ms frame, even the time stamp different of 960 means 20 msec frame. Questions: 1)

Hi, I am new to Opus, I want to decode a RTP packet which has opus payload. Following can describe my intention: I have RTP-packet----------> rtp_header+ opus_payload(20ms/960/48000/1channel) I have now opus_palyload after removing the rtp_header, what I want, a simple code using the opus_decoder which can give me the 20 msec opus paylaod consists of 960 samples. Can anybody put a simple

Hi: I'm having some trouble connecting to the tinc VPN I've setup for my client. Basically I would like to connect to the LAN of my client (as I'm currently thousands of miles away and won't be back for a month and a half) to continue with the development of an in-house ERP. I've setup the router (a Linksys router running the stock firmware) to forward both TCP and UDP

Hi Guus, Am Freitag, den 25.09.2015, 09:36 +0200 schrieb Guus Sliepen: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:41:06AM +0200, Marcus Schopen wrote: > > > I'm running some tinc clients behind a NAT (masquerading, Cisco Router) > > connecting to a host outside on a public IP in a different network. The > > tunnels get unstable every few minutes and I see packet loss when > >

Hi, I'm running some tinc clients behind a NAT (masquerading, Cisco Router) connecting to a host outside on a public IP in a different network. The tunnels get unstable every few minutes and I see packet loss when pinging the clients on their internal tunnel IPs from the host side. Before putting the tinc clients behind the NAT they were running on public IPs too (clients and host in

Hi, I have successfully setup a tinc vpn between two machines, which is great, and now need do the same to a machine behind a firewall (I do not control the firewall, alas). The firewall will allow port 80 out (via an http proxy), so I wish to use GNU http-tunnel (or similar) to tunnel through the firewall. I have also successfully used http-tunnel to tunnel a simple ppp over ssh connection.

Hello, I would like to use push in qmail+dovecot environments. Can someone tell me which components should I use to enable this feature for mobile devices? Thanks. -Ibrahim.

Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks

Hi there! Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong? thanks

Hello, I am experiencing some weird problems in a setup with tinc where communication between the 'server' and the 'clients' occur over 3g connections. Let me describe briefly the setup: - The server, on a public IP, runs tinc 1.0.8, in router mode, and the whole setup uses one VPN network. All client's VPN addresses are on the same subnet, and each client has a seperate

Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes

So finally I got the net vampire to work. I had to roll back to commit 62e0a74 bypassing all the updates done by mdw at samba.org for now. Now the replication PDC1 is the first domain controller created by provision PDC2 is the second is the second domain controller created by net vampire on PDC1 I added user using "net newuser testuser1" in few seconds it appeared on PDC2 using the

Hi, I've successfully running tinc1.0pre4 between two locations on SuSE Linux 7.1 in a special masquerading Firewall environment, so that I'm using the TCPonly keyword in the host files to get a connection. Otherwise I would get the message 'Received UDP packet on port 655 from unknown source <ipaddress in hex:port>'. After upgrading to 1.0pre5 I'm getting this message

> homeClient<br> > Network Bridge: (local Area Network and TAP-Win32) 192.168.6.107 mask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.6.1<br> change -> mask 255.255.0.0 > Tinc.conf<br> > Name = homeClient<br> > ConnectTo = vpnoffice<br> > Mode=switch<br> Change -> Mode=router Why everybody wants switch??? Add -> TCPonly=yes > vpnoffice: Network

Hi, I implemented a little client server scenario with tinc to give a notebook (connected to the "Server" via WLAN) access to the local lan (both Linux OS). I'll try to explain the problem I got: The configuration seems to be ok: The tinc-connection is set up correctly and after it is set up, the server can ping the client. The problem is, that after the connection is startet the

Hi, posted a message to the tinc list few days ago, but seems that there is not that much going on on that list, so I try here. The homepage of tinc says it compresses all traffic, but the manpage says that it only compresses UDP packets. Which one is true? Another thing, how much active development is going on with tinc at the moment? I see that "version 2" is mentioned. Or is there