similar to: confused.. windows setup with firewalls..

hi there ! the current version of tinc crashes with a segfault. it seems, as if has to to with fact, that i don`t have configured any subnets.... if the client tries to start up subnet_update() ist called for myself. the for iteration does not get an entry (because the subnet avl-tree is empty). the later call of net2str causes a segfault, because it gets an empty subnet and tries to access

hi there ! ive build a new tinc package for openwrt (mipsel). its based of the todays svn-checkout, which is the v1.0.4 final. you can get the package from my openwrt repository: http://openwrt.alios.org/ cu markus -- Markus Barenhoff - Spannskamp 26 - D-22527 Hamburg - Germany Phone: +49-40-39991368 Cell: +49-173-7215776 eMail: barenh_m@informatik.haw-hamburg.de pgp key:

i've build a new package with current svn checkout for the OpenWRT distribution (linux, mipsel). path to the repsoitory: http://openwrt.alios.org/ greetz Markus -- Markus Barenhoff - Spannskamp 26 - D-22527 Hamburg - Germany Phone: +49-40-39991368 Cell: +49-173-7215776 eMail: barenh_m@informatik.haw-hamburg.de pgp key: (keyID:0xAE7C7759) FingerPrint: 79 64 AA D9 B7 16 F5 06 6A 88 5F A9

hi there ! i want to announce a tinc 1.0.3 package in the ipkg format for the openwrt distiribution (http://www.openwrt.org). here the path to the package http://openwrt.alios.org/ greetz markus

Hello I've succeeded running older version ov TextAloud on my machine (to some extend). It means that now I can type my registration code in the application and continue with running TextAloud. Later at some moment it ties to use TTS engines and then it shows the message that TTS engine isn't installed. I've installed AT&T Natural voices in TextAloud directory and have instructed

Hello all, Ok, so all this talk has prompted my group to consider installing a firewall. It looks like the most economical approach would be to drop in a machine running linux between our router and our switch to perform this function. We have a 100Mbit full duplex connection here (to other routers on campus), so we would like to be able to pump data through the firewall at this rate. Is

Since it seems that named is theme of the month. I though I would present an example of using firewall to protect your bind service. One of reasons for presenting is that in all examples shown so far it seemed that everyone suggested to leave named full-open. However, it does not always have to be case. Say, if you are running an private network then you want just to allow named get data

Hi- I''d been using shorewall to firewall 2 dsl lines on one box and it was working flawlessly. I had both dsl lines coming into it and then one line going out to the machines. Recently we decided to firewall each line seperatly so we wouldn''t have a single point of failure. This has worked great except that we are unable to get from hosts on line 1 to servers to ip

Hello, is it possible to run tinc behind an unknown firewall(simple NAT) e.g. on windows clients to join an tinc network? These firewalls are not maintained by me and not possible to modify. Thanks for help Kai Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc site: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/

Hello, I'm a bit new to SIP, and I've set up a SIP line with Asterisk and my wholesale provider. That worked, fine. I ahd to open up the ports on my router, forward them to the correct box, again fine. Now, if I get one of my customers to connect his SIP phone to my Asterisk box, and HE'S behind a NAT firewall, does he have to go through the same process, or is it just the Asterisk

I have a SIP trunk to Broadvoice. My Asterisk box (1.4.13) is on public addresses behind a firewall. Originally it was behind a Linksys WRT54G running sveasoft. Sveasoft really can't NOT do NAT even when you turn it off. My Asterisk box is defined as the DMZ box to Sveasoft and it seemed like it was leaving all packets alone. Now I switch to a Centos-based firewall configured with

I am running 1.4 svn-r95946 and have an error -- Got SIP response 489 "Bad event" back from 1.2.3.4 The problem is that this error is being generated by Asterisk trying to send a NOTIFY to a phone behind a NAT firewall that does not exist anymore. The phone was physically decommissioned 3 weeks ago and 4 restarts ago (couple versions up on Asterisk during that time), but is still

Hello In case Asterisk is used in a private LAN behind a firewall while allowing remote SIP clients to connect from the Net, we must open UDP5060 for SIP and a range of UDP ports (as set in rtp.conf) so let incoming voice packets. Provided the user doesn't have access to the firewall (eg. corporate or hotel), and the firewall doesn't allow dynamic port opening through UPnP or NAT-PMP...

I just want to make a SIP call from 192.168.1.3 to 192.168.1.4; or not even a call. Ring? Beep? Ping? Some sort of "hello world" connection. 192.168.1.1 netgear router 192.168.1.2 asterisk (vicidial) 192.168.1.3 ubuntu client 192.168.1.4 mac OSX client (not shown) Do I have a firewall problem which would impact a soft phone from establishing a connection?

We are running tinc (v. 1.0.26) in switch mode with bmx6 (another mesh protocol) running on top of the tap0 interface on about 25 devices. The asymmetric routing of UDP packets is causing my firewall and I presume others to drop some of the packets, since there are no outbound SYN packets originating from the device running tinc. Is there any way to mitigate this issue besides enabling tcponly

I'm sure you all already know this, but it's generally better to have the firewall be a separate physical machine from any server or client machines. Among other reasons, if an attacker can exploit an application running on the firewall machine, the efficacy of the firewall is compromised. You should dedicate a hardened, minimally configured machine for firewall use. If you have lots of

Hello. We are running individual software firewalls (as provided by the respective OSs) on: MAC OSX Panther MSWindows XP Pro SuSE 8.2 LINUX Machines. In addition, the MSWindows XP Pro machine is running Norton's Software Firewall (in conjunction with Antivirus version 10.0.1.13) I am trying to configure SAMBA 2.2.8a from the SuSE LINUX system and am unable to see either the MAC OSX

Hi, A little slightly off topic request for help. I just want to authenticate logins against AD and nothing else, no SMB or anything else. What firewall ports do I need open and is it TCP or UDP. Thanks, Richard Sent from my iPad

I have built R-2.0.1 on AIX64 V 6.5 on a machine that is intentionally isolated from remotely connecting to the internet -- and we'd like to keep it isolated! I have not seen anything in the FAQ's or Install Manual about shutting off or 'configuring out' the internet connectivity. ditto for './configure --help' For some reason > capabilities() jpeg png

Hi all, I plan to install Asterisk at home and would like to ask some question re firewalls(perhaps it sounds stupid for experts, sorry….) I plan to connect Asterisk box to a ADSL line. What Router/Firewall system to buy? I think I need a "VoIP capable" device for this. Any advice? But, really should Asterisk be placed behind the Firewall? What ports to open? Need port forwarding? Or