similar to: IPv4-only networks via IPv6-only network

Hello! I have set up tunnel between a FreeBSD machine and Windows Vista. Tunnel is established, but when I try to ping either end ping fails. I have temporarily switched off firewalls on both machines, no luck. Here is client tinc.conf on Vista: Name = lenovo_client ConnectTo = lenovo_server Interface = tinctap Subnet = 10.20.40.0/24 Sevrer tinc.conf on FreeBSD: Device=/dev/tap0

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

Hello! I use tincd to interconnect 3 LANs: A, B and C. So long, it works fine: everybody reaches everybody. But I want a different behavior: A and B should be allowed to talk, as should B and C. I tried to simply delete the host-files on the nodes that should not be allowed to talk to eachother: A has a hostfile from B B has a hostfile from A and C C has a hostfile from B But this is no

Hi ! I want to setup tinc 1.0 pre4 with kernel 2.4.5 I didn't find information about settings of tun/tap device I did in kernel - [*] Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers Network device support <M> Universal TUN/TAP device driver support in /etc/modules.conf - alias char-major-10-200 tun mknod -m 600 /dev/tun c 10 200 chown 0.0 /dev/tun In mailing list archive I

Hello Peter, Your question is similar to my recent question, and I have a similar Ping problem.But yours, with two Tinc networks, is more complex than mine. All I can say, and I hope it helps, is that in my case I have found my Ubuntu Tinc Server nodes do not like being specified as a address on the same network as the local LANsSo I have a specific network for the Tinc Server nodes, and in this

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >> following guide, unsuccessfully: >> https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/

I have a 4 Node Tinc VPN setup with 2 nodes on my LAN and the other 2 outside the LAN in the cloud. Everything has been working great for about 5 years now, until today when I decided to move one of the nodes to another box. I basically, copied over the /etc/tinc folder to the new server and also moved the /etc/network/interfaces file, so that the new server was an exact mirror (more or less).

* sorry for the other schema, it came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On 10/5/2014 1:56 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: >> On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >>> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>>> >>

Hello Because I did not send , and then retransmitted. I am using the CentOS5.7. In a state where the link down, I did a ping to the IPv4 and IPv6. IPv4 succeeds in ping. but, IPv6 is ping fails. Once confirmed by ifconfig, it did not have a Link-Local Address. At link down, Is the Link-Local Address not set? Leave the link down, Is there a way to avoid this? # ethtool eth1 Settings for eth1: ?

Hello, I''ve got this problem. There is an linux server with 2.4.24 kernel and pinging from him to internet (or from lan) ping randomly jumps up: 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=387 ttl=59 time=30.0 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=388 ttl=59 time=32.6 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=389 ttl=59 time=34.9 ms

> Try > > ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 Thanks for the response. I tried. However, It did not resolve.... # ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 PING 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8(2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8) from fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a eth1: 56 data bytes On 2015/11/13 2:22, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, ???? wrote: > >> Hello >>

Hi Laine What you have suggested sounds eminently reasonable. Thanks for your advice. I'm going to give it a shot and report back. Richard On 11/27/19 1:38 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 11/26/19 11:07 PM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: >> Hello >> >> I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. >> >> Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts

I'm completely confused here and I'm hoping someone here has a setup they're willing to share, or help me configure things on my end. My connectivity is through Comcast, who unfortunately, does not offer ipv6 in my area. My connection goes like this: Comcast -> Motorola Surfboard Cable Router -> CentOS 6.5 server The CentOS server is multi-homed and manages the internal

This has probably been discussed before, but since I'm new on the list I hope You have patience with me. I have a four brick distributed/replicated setup. The computers are multi-core 16GB memory and 2*2.0TB in raid1 SATA-disks locally. The nodes are connected by 1 GB ethernet. All nodes have glusterfs 3.3beta2 installed and they are running debian 6 64bit. The underlying filesystems are

Hi Ashish, On 09/02/15 17:50, Ashish Yadav wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Graeme Russ <gruss at tss-engineering.com > <mailto:gruss at tss-engineering.com>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've configured a Fedora 20 server with samba to share a few user > directories and a printer. > > From a Windows 8 laptop, I am able

i am hoping this attachment gets through. It deals with bug in ping that made it very difficult to set up a system with two gateways. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091009/ddfc8176/attachment-0004.html> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am trying to use t.test on the following data: date type INTERVAL nCASES MTF SDF MTO SDO nFST MF nOBS MO MB BIASCV BIASEV ME MAE RMSE CRCF 2001-06-15 avn GE1.00 4385 0.246 0.300 1.502 0.556 1367 1.373 4385 1.502 1.471 0.285 0.164 -1.256 1.266 1.399 0.056 2001-06-15 avn

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >