similar to: default route from windows through tincd

I am trying to shape a client (somewhat advanced). This is my target: Client is 192.168.2.224. I would like to allow him to download with 500000 bits/sec in general. But, for a specific port(say 22), i would like him to download with 300000 bit/sec only. The problem is that my configuration (maybe wrong) allows him to download with 800000 bit/sec. (500000 generally + 300000 on port 22) I thought

Providing logs will greatly increase your chances of people helping you. Do 'tincd -n VPNname -D -d2' or -d3 or -d4 until you see error messages, do this on both sides. My common mistake is forgetting to copy the public cert to the other side. -Cobin On Jan 26, 2015 5:53 AM, "Henk van der Meer" <hvdmeer at timeservice.nl> wrote: > Hello, > > > > I have 4

On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Olivier Tirat wrote: > I'd like to mark all sockets established by a tincd process with a mark > passed as an argument in the command line. [...] > Do you think its something interesting? > Do you think its a hard work to do? > If not i could probably try to do it and propose a patch for that if you > think it is interesting. I

Hello all I've just installed samba 3.0 alpha from cvs, on a red hat 8.0 linux station, and I have some strange behavior when I start the samba daemons : First there is no success / failure indication [root@linux-integ francois]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start Starting SMB services: Starting NMB services: But the daemons seem to be running : [root@linux-integ francois]# netstat -a ... tcp

Hello, I have 4 VM's running in Microsoft Azure. They all should have similar configurations except from their tinc ip addresses of course. They run tinc 1.0.24. I have a 5th machine, my development machine. I am able to ping all 4 VM's from my computer when I start tinc from the commandline (tincd -n innomeer -D -d 2). 3 of the computers also work ok when running tinc as a service

I'm new to tinc. I have built tincd for Linux FC5. I also have an embedded Linux platform to deal with. I'm unable to build tincd directly on embedded linux, due to compiler missing/incompatible etc. issues. So I wish to build a standalone tincd on Linux FC5, and just ftp this single executable over to embedded linux and use it. How to do that? Right now when I ftp tincd to embedded and

On my Gentoo box I updated openssl to openssl-1.0.0a-r3 I'm not able to compile with openssl-1.0.0a-r3 if I want a static binary ./configure LDFLAGS=-static the configure scripts complains like this: checking for RAND_pseudo_bytes... no configure: error: Missing OpenSSL functionality, make sure you have installed the latest version. this was working with previous version of OpenSSL.

Hello, I'm trying to set up a vpn using tinc, so I installed tinc with the rpm version on my firewall as a listener. Setting up the tap device is no problem. The file /etc/tinc/tinc.conf looks like: TapDevice = /dev/tap0 MyVirtualIP = 192.168.2.1/24 Vpnmask = 255.255.255.0 When I start the script /etc/rc.d/init.d/tinc start it says something about missing /etc/tinc/nets.boot

TincList, I have set up tinc on many windows boxes, and never with this problem before. The machine is running tinc-1.0.2, with all of the proper files set up. We are using the tap-win32 adapter, and it is installed correctly. I even uninstalled and reinstalled the adapter when I saw this problem. No affect. The user running the tincd demon is the administrator, and no personal firewalls are

Tinc list, I am working to install tinc-1.0.2 on an XP Home machine. The program has been installed, and all files and keys are in the proper places. I know this is true because I've installed it on quite a few machines, and they all work properly. (Good work Guus!) The question comes down to this output. When I attempt to run tincd for the first time, I get this error: C:\>cd

Hello, can one specify the priv/pub key filepath without the -c switch. I need some more controll over where the keys get stored. tincd.exe, without the -n switch stores it's keys in a static path. Relativ pathes would help. thx, Axel

hi guys, I've just started being interested in tinc and I built the latest tincd release (1.0.7) on my Intel MacBook (OS X 10.4.8 "Tiger"/Darwin kernel 8.8.1, gcc 4.0.1), using shared libraries. should anyone be interested on testing/using it, is there a place for me to upload the .gz package? plus, how can I more precisely say what kind of environment I compiled on? e.g.

> Currently, i have nodes with PMTUDiscovery =yes and ClampMSS = yes. Hello, these features were introduced in 1.0.13 correct ?? I also understand that the two settings are by default "yes" if not explictly set to "no" in the config file. what may happen if I have a network with mixed versions from 1.0.11 and 1.0.13, where the older daemons do not implement that feature

Hello, ?? I've a OpenVPN linuxbox (a VPS) and I want also to join it into a Tinc network. ?? Can I install tinc even if there is a OpenVPN server running ? There is any to know before doing this ? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20130323/3e82d70f/attachment.html>

On a recently formatted debiann 7 server, I'm running tinc1.1pre9 and running in to this type of error every 3-4 days. Mar 31 19:35:26 MediaBox kernel: [256033.433285] tincd[3301] general protection ip:406961 sp:7fff9e763b20 error:0 in tincd[400000+28000] I initially had compiled tinc1.1pre9 creating a static binary using musl libc. Thinking it must have been an issue with musl I

Hi guys, I'm new to tinc and I'm following this tutorial <https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-tinc-and-set-up-a-basic-vpn-on-ubuntu-14-04> to set up tinc on Ubuntu. Because I wanted to test out the 1.1 branch, I compiled tinc from source. However, when I start tincd, it searches for config files in /usr/local/etc, rather than in /etc as shown in the

+1 I was noticing the same thing and currently solved it using dnsmasq. On Feb 1, 2015 1:48 AM, "crocket" <crockabiscuit at gmail.com> wrote: > If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration > variable after name resolution becomes possible. > > I think tincd should succeed in

On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration > variable after name resolution becomes possible. > > I think tincd should succeed in resolving domain names after name > resolution becomes available. The problem is when

Agreed. On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > > > >> If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > >> for ever to resolve domain names in

Am 02.02.2015 um 19:32 schrieb Nicol?s Reynolds: > William Kennington <william-5Om/gJxqp8Dx9BLsLxWUfA at public.gmane.org> writes: > >> Agreed. >> On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne-ypMCQUleWbRvynnTyRI/EA at public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >>> Considering how cheap that operation seems to be, would it make sense >>> to