similar to: SIGBUS on SPARCv9

Pulled from Bugtraq. Dan ____________________________________________________________________________ Dan Yocum | Phone: (630) 840-8525 Computing Division OSS/FSS | Fax: (630) 840-6345 .~. L Fermi National Accelerator Lab | email: yocum@fnal.gov /V\ I P.O. Box 500 | WWW: www-oss.fnal.gov/~yocum/ // \\ N Batavia, IL

Dear All I am trying a very simple set up: (a bit long message follows) #Flush previous definitions $TC qdisc del dev $VVNET root >&/dev/null $TC qdisc del dev $INTERNET root >&/dev/null $IPT -t mangle -D PREROUTING -i $INTERNET -d 200.231.56.0/24 -j IMQ --todev 0 # Mothers off all disciplines $TC qdisc add dev $VVNET root handle 1: htb default FFFF r2q 1 $TC qdisc add dev

Hello everyone! I''m simply trying to put a PRIO inside an HTB (used to throttle). I''ve got interactive traffic on the network that I want to give priority (VoIP + Citrix + Video). I''ve used the filters in a CBQ script fine, but am having trouble adjusting them to this setup such that they properly assign the traffic. tc qdisc del root dev $e tc qdisc add dev $e

Hello. I found that anonymous structures does not work on gcc-2.95. If you guys want to support a bit older platforms I suggest fixing it. You can check out patch I created to fix this issue. I just added 2 extra structures to remove anonymous structs inside connection_status_t and node_status_t. Patch is here: ftp://borg.uu3.net/pub/unix/tinc/tinc.patch Attaching it as well. Regards, Borg

hello folks, this is my first post to that list. so I hope I am not completely OT here :-) reading the (excellent!) lartc and then writing my own qos-script I have still some open questions which I will try to formulate now: - "Now we can optionally attach queuing disciplines to the leaf classes. If none is specified the default is pfifo." - I can''t find info about Pfifo.

--Qz2CZ664xQdCRdPu Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87" Content-Disposition: inline --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Unfortunately there is a very unpopular announcement to be made on this list: A netfilter security advisory. Phillipe Biondi has been

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11492 riccardo at datahost.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|eric at anholt.net |swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org Status|NEEDINFO |NEW AssignedTo|eric at anholt.net

Does FreeBSD have fallocate(2) or equivalent? On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote: > On 23 October 2017 at 18:49, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> BTW, posix_fallocate() might provide better portability and decrease the > >> likelihood of falling back on ftruncate(). > >

One of my servers has recently started giving an error every time I run "aide --check". I ran it manually twice today with the same results. The second time, I added the -V flag, but that didn't give me anything useful. The system is currently running CentOS 5.3. Nothing on the system has changed recently (that I am aware of). The Aide database hasn't been updated in a few

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: smbstatus getting a SIGBUS error Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:52:13 +0700 From: Arnold Troeger <stssart@bkk.unocal.com> To: samba-bugs@samba.org CC: arnold.troeger@bkk.unocal.com I'm running Samba 2.0.7 and have been having a few problems with it. Just to keep things focused, I'll stick with smbstatus as this one has been the longest lasting

But that would disable mmap IO on systems that don't support fallocate. I'm not sure if OpenBSD people are for example happy about that. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > If your system does not support fallocate(2), we use

Somemore information regarding the smbstatus error. The sigbus error is occuring where I noted below. I now have data values to go along with the location. The SIGBUS generating bit is "entry_scanner_p->e.pid" which looks to be in an unaccessable area of memory. Looking back through the code, I find a couple of bizarities. For example file_scanner_p->num_share_mode_entries

Hi Folks, I'm trying to run samba on Solaris 9. It works OK when I don't compile in kerberos and ldap, but when with those two compiled in, smbd seems to freeze (nmbd and winbindd are OK). After a bit of investigation I notice something strange in truss: ... /1@1: -> libldap-2.3:ldap_free_urldesc(0x30dfe8, 0x32e048, 0x32dfb8, 0x3 /1@1: ->

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> If your system does not support fallocate(2), we use ftruncate(2) to >> create an output file. fallocate(2) succeeds even if your disk have less >> space than the

Hi, I need to implement the compare and swap instruction in the Sparc backend. It has the form: casa [reg]imm, reg, reg I believe I have specified it correctly in SparcV9Instr.def: I(CASAi, "casa", 4, -1, B12, true, 0, 1, SPARC_SINGLE, M_LOAD_FLAG|M_STORE_FLAG) Is this correct? And how do I specify the above syntax in SparcV9InstrInfo.td? Brent

>From: Misha Brukman <brukman at uiuc.edu> >On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:33:34PM -0600, Brent Monroe wrote: >> I need to implement the compare and swap instruction in the >> Sparc backend. It has the form: >> >> casa [reg]imm, reg, reg >If you look in the instruction manual, each instruction has a >"format" which is F1, F2, F3 or F4, so your

Hi, I need to generate a branch instruction from within CodeGenIntrinsic in SparcV9BurgISel.cpp. I generate a few instructions and add them to the mvec vector, and then I need to generate a branch whose target is the first instruction in the vector. I've seen how other portions of the code do this, but they have access to more information than CodeGenIntrinsic. Thanks, Brent

Hi! I can't build LLVM using GCC 4.1 (GCC CVS mainline) after http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050328/025003.html Build terminated with error: /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/ModuloScheduling/DependenceAnalyzer.cpp:25: error: explicit qualification in declaration of `llvm::FunctionPass* llvm::createDependenceAnalyzer()' at line:

Hi: When I tried to use llc -march=sparcv9 to compile some llvm .bc to SparcV9, I got such error: llc: /llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/SparcV9RegInfo.h:62: virtual void llvm::TargetRegClassInfo::markColorsUsed(unsigned int, int, int, std::vector<bool, std::allocator<bool> >&) const: Assertion `UserRegType == RegTypeWanted && "Default method is probably incorrect for

Hi: In the file of SparcV9BurgISel.cpp, you said you didn't implement the "Switch" instruction and I also can't find how the "Select" instruction is implemented. So do you do some work to handle these two kind of instructions in other parts? Where can I find it? Thank you! -- Shuhan