similar to: Tinc for WIndows

Hi ! I want to setup tinc 1.0 pre4 with kernel 2.4.5 I didn't find information about settings of tun/tap device I did in kernel - [*] Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers Network device support <M> Universal TUN/TAP device driver support in /etc/modules.conf - alias char-major-10-200 tun mknod -m 600 /dev/tun c 10 200 chown 0.0 /dev/tun In mailing list archive I

Hello, I have 2 hosts HostA and HostB HostA - 10.38.9.2, kernel 2.4.16, tincd from Debian package HostB - 10.38.9.223, kernel 2.2.17-21mdk, tincd from tarball package. HostA: ------------------------------ /etc/tinc/test4/tinc.conf Name = HostA ConnectTo = HostB TapDevice = /dev/misc/net/tun PrivateKeyFile = /etc/tinc/test4/rsa_key.priv /etc/tinc/test4/hosts/HostA Subnet = 10.0.0.0/8 Port =

Hello everyone, Last week the CVS version of tinc gained the ability to run under Windows, in a Cygwin environment (http://www.cygwin.com), making use of the virtual network driver from the CIPE project (http://cipe-win32.sourceforge.net/). Preparations were also being made to support Windows without Cygwin. Today James Yonan of OpenVPN (http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/) anounced a port of

I have to install a VPN between three places (A, B, C), the A is a Windows 2000 will be the VPN Server and the others are Windows98 and are the clients. B and C doesnt need to comunicate.I have the following questions and i would appreciate some help: 1) I only have to install tinc in the Server, or i have to install it in the clients too? 2) I read in the documentation that tinc is compatible

Hallo, Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) waehring (1.1) | +-------------------+--------------+ | | | vpnhub1 (1.1) igor (1.1) turing (1.0) | | | +-------------------+--------------+ | tokamak Whenever another node outside of the graph connects to vpnhub or igor

Hi all - sorry for the off-topic posting - just that the list of consultants on the samba site is horrendously out of date! I thought that this would be the best place for me to find suitable resources... firstly I would like to say thanks a million to all the samba team for your ongoing efforts and great product. I just wish I had more time to experiment with it! We have the startings of a good

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Agreed. But note that the standards are set long before that... ??? By "standard" what do you mean. ??? Linux's history has been notorious for variance from ANSI, NIST, POSIX and GNU standards. Yes, far less than Microsoft and even some UNIX vendors, but there are still major issues today with this. When developers try

Hello, More than a week ago Peter Gutmann contacted us and showed us a writeup in which he analysed CIPE, VTun and tinc. A few days ago he posted this to a cryptography mailing list, and someone posted this on Slashdot. In response we've added a new section to the website dedicated to the current security issues. Currently, you can find our response to Peter Gutmann's analysis there:

Hello, More than a week ago Peter Gutmann contacted us and showed us a writeup in which he analysed CIPE, VTun and tinc. A few days ago he posted this to a cryptography mailing list, and someone posted this on Slashdot. In response we've added a new section to the website dedicated to the current security issues. Currently, you can find our response to Peter Gutmann's analysis there:

Richard Atterer wrote: >On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:00:58PM +0100, I.R. van Dongen wrote: > > >>You might want to check tinc (http://tinc.nl.linux.org) >> >> > >I strongly recommend *not* to use tinc. ><http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/249142> illustrates that the >authors didn't have enough expertise to build a secure tool 2 years ago.

I've played around with the config some more after finding and reading through the mailing list archives. I think I'm being tripped up by my ipchains ruleset, so I'm going to play with it when I get home tonight and can set up a private network. If I have any further problems, I'll subscribe to, then send a message to the mailing list. Thanks for your patience and a VPN that's

With much pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0. Here is a summary of the changes: * Lots of small bugfixes and code cleanups. * Throughput doubled and latency reduced. * Added support for LZO compression. * No need to set MAC address or disable ARP anymore. * Added support for Windows 2000 and XP, both natively and in a Cygwin environment. This version is compatible with

With much pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0. Here is a summary of the changes: * Lots of small bugfixes and code cleanups. * Throughput doubled and latency reduced. * Added support for LZO compression. * No need to set MAC address or disable ARP anymore. * Added support for Windows 2000 and XP, both natively and in a Cygwin environment. This version is compatible with

Hello all-- I am trying to get a tunnel up between a RedHat 9 (hare) machine and a Suse 9 machine (turtle). tinc-1.0.2 compiled fine on each (although I have tried this with the precompiled binary just in case). No matter what I seem to do, I can't get any output whatsoever. No log output with -d5 -D, no /var/log/messages output, nothing at all. tincd just returns with a 1

Evening, I've got * asterisk up and running with nufone account for inbound and outbound calls from the world... everything works quite nicely except that I noticed last night that when I have a call active from * to nufone, web surfing on the network slows to a crawl... additionally, I have a VPN tunnel to another office (using CIPE) and while inter-office (i.e. - SIP to SIP) calls

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Yes, but... whose choice was it to ship 2.6 with lots of broken > and omitted stuff when 2.4 works better for many things? Again, 2-2-2, 6-6-6 At some point, Red Hat has to start the new series for "early adopters." That means being the first to adopt the new GLibC, GCC, kernel, etc... Looking at just the GLibC 2+ generations

Hello, Sorry if this mail would have to be post in the development ML, but my problem is just at using centOS.. I'm trying to recompile the centOS-3.1 kernel. I done this: # cd /usr/src/linux-2.4 # make menuconfig < i select my CPU type > < Exit and save > # make dep # make modules (...no errors ...) gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include -Wall

Hi list, I have tried google but just cant get this to work or figure it out. My setup ======== vanilla 2.6.13 kernel with CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=y My configuration: A host with two ppp links. Ontop of these two ppp dialup

On Fri, 15 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:26:46PM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the > > easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) > [...] > > Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for haegar_tokamak > > -> igor which does not match existing entry (Local

First of all, My apologies for this maybe slight OT post, but I have so much confidence and read so much good replies on this list, that I am still asking my question. I''m looking for a linux distribution to use on our school''s homemade routers. The routers are small miniITX based systems with 2 network interfaces. I added a 4 port D-Link network card in some cases, when I