Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Trivial setup question"
2010 Nov 28
4
TCPOnly is required since 1.0.13?
Hi,
I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something
strange.
All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes
were not contactable.
I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses
the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6.
===
name = node1
mode = switch
AddressFamily = any
PMTU = 1280
PMTUDiscovery = yes
2006 Dec 04
4
20 kb/s as max with TCPonly
Hi there!
Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another
no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while
connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the
connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong?
thanks
2006 Dec 04
4
20 kb/s as max with TCPonly
Hi there!
Today I've tried a FTP connection (me with TCPOnly send file to another
no TCPOnly), but the upload bandwidth was about 20 kb/s, while
connecting to the other directly (I upload a file to him via FTP) the
connection was about 5 times faster... what's wrong?
thanks
2015 Sep 25
2
Tinc clients behind a NAT, tunnels get unstable
Hi,
I'm running some tinc clients behind a NAT (masquerading, Cisco Router)
connecting to a host outside on a public IP in a different network. The
tunnels get unstable every few minutes and I see packet loss when
pinging the clients on their internal tunnel IPs from the host side.
Before putting the tinc clients behind the NAT they were running on
public IPs too (clients and host in
2009 Aug 22
7
Address family not supported
Hi everyone,
I'm setting up a VPN over IPv6, attempting to build an IPv4-over-IPv6
tunnel, but when I try to connect to the server, I got this: System call
`getaddrinfo' failed: Address family not supported.
Client runs WindowsXP, and I did almost exactly the same as
http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/windows-install . Here is the configuration
files:
------- tinc.conf -------
Name =
2015 Sep 25
2
Tinc clients behind a NAT, tunnels get unstable
Hi Guus,
Am Freitag, den 25.09.2015, 09:36 +0200 schrieb Guus Sliepen:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:41:06AM +0200, Marcus Schopen wrote:
>
> > I'm running some tinc clients behind a NAT (masquerading, Cisco Router)
> > connecting to a host outside on a public IP in a different network. The
> > tunnels get unstable every few minutes and I see packet loss when
> >
2009 Jan 06
4
Connection problems ?
Hi,
Best wishes to all for this new year.
Trying to connect my Laptop (HSDPA) to MainPC (DSL). Both running Windows
XP.
Laptop host file:
Address = 41.208.50.176
Subnet = 10.0.0.2
-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----
...
-----END RSA PUBLIC KEY-----
MainPC host file:
Address = 41.242.172.108
Subnet = 10.0.0.1
-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----
...
-----END RSA PUBLIC KEY-----
Tried alternate Subnet
2018 Apr 10
2
Route certain trafic via a tinc node that is not directly connected.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Hans de Groot wrote:
> hosta <--> hostb <--> hostc
>
> Hosta and hostc are not directly connected via tinc. But both are conncted
> via hostb (I called my network tincnet). This works fine I can ssh from
> hosta to hostc and vice versa without any problems.
>
> hostc is in a whitelisted iprange at some service
2003 Sep 06
2
What is wrong? "Creating metasocket failed"
Hi there,
I'm trying to set tinc and I get the following messages:
Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: tincd 1.0.1 (Aug 14 2003 15:09:44) starting, debug level 0
Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode)
Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: Script tinc-up exited with non-zero status 126
Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]:
2001 May 24
1
tinc from behind a NAT
I'm stuck behind a corporate NAT that I obviously have absolutely no
control over. The nice thing is that the firewall rules, AFAIK, are very
nice.
I've had tinc running before from behind nazi firewalls with no NAT.
Been fiddling with tinc for many hours, but have been SOL.
The local machine is the client (has ConnectTo in the conf), and remote
is the server (has Listen in the conf).
2010 Jan 26
1
TCP throughput?
Dear
I am testing tinc on Windows and found some interesting behavior.
I used "TCPOnly" parameter for both end because I wanted to go through
NAT. However, by using TCPOnly parameter, the response of PING slowed
down significantly.
The PING response with UDP is about 4ms, but it bumped up to 2000ms with
TCP.
I am just curious whether this is caused by using TCP.
Regards
Masateru
2010 Dec 16
3
tinc node behind nat router.
I have some tinc nodes behind a nat router.
Which ipaddress should i use in de host file for the tinc nodes behind a
nat router.
The internet ipaddress or the private ipaddress ?
Perry
2009 Sep 14
3
Problem making connection can anyone help me?
Well i currently try to set up tinc between two hosts, one with normal dsl connection one behind some kind of unknown firewall (Note since OpenVp is able to connect when the normal one is the Server I guess tinc should be able, too)
start.bat-------------------------------tincd -n Empire-Network -D -d4 --bypass-security (Bypass is only currently because tis not working yet)
2009 Mar 06
2
Problems with UDP frame size??
Well this has had me stumped for days now.
For months I've been using tinc in TCPOnly because I always received the
unknown host error when using UDP.
On Monday, i set the flag IndirectData = yes in my host files, and removed
the TCPOnly line.
Initially, everything worked great. My throughput increased from 600KB/sec
to 2MB/sec between the sites.
However, I also did some testing with
2004 Mar 12
1
Tinc over httptunnel
Hi,
I'm having some trouble trying to run tinc over GNU httptunnel. On
server A I have:
/etc/tinc/netname/tinc-up:
#!/bin/sh
ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.3.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0
/usr/bin/hts -F localhost:655 8888
/etc/tinc/netname/hosts/A:
Address = foo.com
Subnet = 10.3.0.0/24
TCPonly = yes
/etc/tinc/netname/hosts/B:
ConnectTo = A
Subnet = 10.4.0.0/24
TCPonly = yes
2006 Apr 22
1
Setup tinc for "Road warrior"?
Hi:
I'm having some trouble connecting to the tinc VPN I've setup for my client.
Basically I would like to connect to the LAN of my client (as I'm currently
thousands of miles away and won't be back for a month and a half) to continue
with the development of an in-house ERP.
I've setup the router (a Linksys router running the stock firmware) to forward
both TCP and UDP
2009 Dec 16
2
Response time on Tinc VPNs, Bandwith on Tinc-VPN
Hello,
response time: how is it possible to increase the response time on Tinc VPNs. When I use tinc over a fast or giga-bit network connection the ping-response time is normally about 1800 to 2000 ms. Sometimes I get ping response times at about 2.500 to 3.000 ms over a normal Ethernet Connection or a television-cable connection within the same providers-network in the same city. The ping-time
2009 Oct 11
1
Routing through vpn
Hi,
I've an up and running tinc vpn between my laptop and my office computer
(on which I've root access if needs be). From where I'm sitting right now, UDP
packets are dropped. TcpOnly has solved the problem for the tinc part and
I can still connect to my office. I'd like to access some important
<cough>irc</cough> UDP-only services. Do I have a
2003 Sep 22
2
Problems when outgoing source port is altered by router
hi folks
well, tinc is a really nice tool and we implemented it on 3 linux servers
and 2 mobile clients (XP notebooks) so far.
one of the 3 tinc servers is making troubles, when a connection is initiated
from
this server over a zyxel 642 adsl router out to the other 2 servers in the
internet. the logfiles of the other 2 servers shows:
> tinc[1398]: Received UDP packet from unknown
2002 Feb 13
1
keyword TCPOnly in release 1.0pre5
Hi,
I've successfully running tinc1.0pre4 between two locations on SuSE
Linux 7.1 in a special masquerading Firewall environment, so that I'm
using the TCPonly keyword in the host files to get a connection.
Otherwise I would get the message 'Received UDP packet on port 655 from
unknown source <ipaddress in hex:port>'.
After upgrading to 1.0pre5 I'm getting this message