similar to: can't ping to an internal IP through tinc's virtual interfaces (fwd)

Hi all, There's long time I'm having problems with a vpn... I'd be glad if somebody could check my current setup. Our problem is we're having tinc-vpn shortcuts while we have no bandwidth problem nither 'ssh' trouble. I attached some log lines from both the "server" and the "client". Some ASCII art... ___ ___ ___

Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that CentOS 5 Beta (or likely final) supports the 3ware 9650se card. Since 3ware hasn't released a driver disk yet, I put one together. It supports CentOS 5 Beta, and may/should support Final. If anyone is interested, I've posted it here: http://www.truedesign.org/3ware-centos5/ Jason

Hi. As I wrote some days ago (It worked! [Was: my two hosts don't see each other]) I succeeded at setting up a tinc VPN between two hosts (isivirtual and pamvirtual) I tried to ping from pamvirtual, the external machine, to an internal IP of 'isivirtual' but it doesn't work. Neither 'traceroute'. What's going on? At 'isivirtual' routing (ip forwarding) is

TincList, I have set up tinc on many windows boxes, and never with this problem before. The machine is running tinc-1.0.2, with all of the proper files set up. We are using the tap-win32 adapter, and it is installed correctly. I even uninstalled and reinstalled the adapter when I saw this problem. No affect. The user running the tincd demon is the administrator, and no personal firewalls are

Hi: First of all, thanks for this great piece of software! I found very clear the presentation sheets used at Linux Expo, Amsterdam. :-) About my problem, I setup everything to connect our two boxes. If I type 'ifconfig' I can see them up. Also the routes. ISIvirtual - Our firewall (iptables) which connects to the Internet through ADSL with a public dynamic IP. (the SSL client)

Hi, I implemented a little client server scenario with tinc to give a notebook (connected to the "Server" via WLAN) access to the local lan (both Linux OS). I'll try to explain the problem I got: The configuration seems to be ok: The tinc-connection is set up correctly and after it is set up, the server can ping the client. The problem is, that after the connection is startet the

Still experimenting with the automesh function. In the midst of that, I encountered a new problem. Of the 6 linux boxes in my tinc VPN, 3 were RedHat 9, 1 was Suse 9 Pro, 1 was Fedora Core 1, and one was RedHat 8.0. All was well. They were running a mix of the static binary and locally compiled-from-source binaries. I updated two of the RedHat 9 boxes to Fedora Core 1, about 3 days

Dear developers, I am interested in understanding in more details how tinc's metaprotocol works. I apologize in advance if this was already described somewhere, I could not find it in the mailing list archive. So let's say machine A has a Address= ip.b.example and manages to contact server B via the meta connection. 1) Then B's tinc daemon will send to A edge and subnet

Hello all, For your information, below are some "bugs" (possible optimizations?), all related, for tinc's initialization in systemd. Since both RedHat and Debian recent distros have switched to systemd,**please** make sure that a solid initialization mechanism is included in precompiled .rpm and .deb packages (CentOS, Debian, Fedora, etc.)

Hi there! I'm totally new to the concept 'self-made VPNs' :P I've discovered tinc and I think it's not as easy as hamachi, but not so hard as OpenVPN :D Now: I've got 4 questions: question n.1: I'm behind a router. This router is configurable, but I'm also behind a provider's NAT (private IPs with a common public IP). Will tinc work, or it will do as

Hi all, hi Guus, in july 2004 i received an e-mail from you concerning the way a packet takes across a (tinc)vpn: > They are forwarded from eth0 to tap0, but the kernel doesn't know that > tinc is forwarding them from tap0 to ippp0. So, the UDP and TCP > packets that tinc sends will be seen by the OUTPUT chain instead of > the FORWARD chain. At the other end, the received UDP

Hello all, this is what happens when I attempt to ping both search engines: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/168484871 One has 100% packet loss, the other none. Here is my route -n: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/219711338 Also, this is my iptables -L output: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/2102713387 This is a 64-bit virtual machine running on Azure, OpenLogic CentOS 6.3. If more info is needed,

Hi, I hope someone could help me out. Pls find the details below. dom0: ifconfig before "xend start" eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:76:53:44:FB inet addr:10.0.0.3 <http://10.0.0.3> Bcast:10.0.0.255 <http://10.0.0.255>Mask: 255.255.255.0 <http://255.255.255.0> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX

I''ve setup Xen 3.0.2-2 (binary install) on Ubuntu 6.06, got my domUs up and running, got them connected to the Internet but I can''t even ping to any of these VMs. Now I''m not linux/xen genious but could the problem be that xen-br0 doesn''t have an IPv4 address? (it''s got an IPv6 address) Since I don''t use IPv6 on my network this seems a

Hi Centos Users # ping 10.104.89.146 connect: Invalid argument The Server has normal network connectivity. I ssh into it over this interface. Strace output on Pastebin [0]. SELinux is disabled. Centos 4.3 cheers Simon [0] http://pastebin.com/m720052a8 -- XMPP: sjolle at swissjabber.org

Has anyone else noticed with CentOS 5, that ping now starts at icmp_seq 1 instead of 0. It's clearly not a problem, just curious if anyone knows why it changed. Graham

> > Hi, > > I'm running a 2.4.18-14 kernel with a heavy IO profile using > ext3 over RAID 0+1 volumes. > > From time to time I get a black screen stuck machine while > trying to umount a volume during an IO workload (as part of a > failback solution - but after killing all IO processes ), > with ping still responding, but everything else mostly dead. >

> > Hi, > > The problem reproduces on a 2.4.18-19 kernel as well. Took > some more time but finally it roared its ugly head. > > This is the stack trace from the new kernel: > > > c01190b8 f3791eb4 set_running_and_schedule > > c010a8b0 f3791ed0 enable_irq > > c014200c f3791f0c IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector > > c0155595 f3791f0c clear_inode >

sorry for the garbage, my mails to the list are rejected, just gtesting. -- Cordialement, Ghislain _______________________________________________ Puppet-users mailing list Puppet-users@madstop.com https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users

Hi all, I''m seeing strange behavior with net-ping on Windows, which uses win32-open3 (Open3.popen3) behind the scenes. Download (or checkout) net-ping and run this: ruby -Ilib test\tc_pingexternal.rb It looks like the test suite is running twice. What''s happening? Thanks, Dan This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or privileged